Kevin E. Bailey, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 26, 2002
01A23153_r (E.E.O.C. Aug. 26, 2002)

01A23153_r

08-26-2002

Kevin E. Bailey, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Kevin E. Bailey v. United States Postal Service

01A23153

August 26, 2002

.

Kevin E. Bailey,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A23153

Agency No. 1F-946-0005-99

Hearing No. 370-A1-X2468

DECISION

Complainant appeals from the agency's May 6, 2002 decision finding no

discrimination. Complainant alleges discrimination on the bases of race,

sex, and reprisal when the agency failed to reinstate him to the casual

position: (1) in September 1998; (2) in September or October 1999;

and (3) on May 30, 2000. On March 25, 2002, an Administrative Judge

(AJ), after a hearing, issued a decision finding no discrimination.

Specifically, regarding claim 1, the AJ found that complainant failed to

establish a prima facie case of discrimination. Regarding claims 2 and 3,

the AJ found that the agency presented a legitimate, nondiscriminatory

reason for its actions, which complainant failed to rebut. On May 6,

2002, the agency issued a decision adopting the AJ's finding, which

complainant now appeals.

Regarding claim 1, complainant admits that he failed to apply for

a casual appointment, despite his knowledge that an application was

necessary to be considered. Therefore, we agree with the AJ's finding

that complainant failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination

because he failed to establish that he applied for the position.

Regarding claims 2 and 3, we concur with the AJ's findings that the

agency articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for its

failure to reinstate complainant, which complainant failed to rebut.

With regard to claim 2, the selecting official reasoned that, because

complainant indicated in his application that he had been terminated

from a casual appointment for failure to follow instructions in 1996,

other candidates were more suitable than complainant. With regard

to claim 3, the selecting official indicates that he did not select

complainant because complainant failed to reveal, in his application,

that he had ever been employed by the agency or terminated for cause.

Moreover, the selecting official reviewed complainant's past evaluation

which indicated that complainant had trouble following instructions.

Complainant did not rebut the agency's reasons for not reinstating him.

Therefore, we find that complainant has failed to show, by a preponderance

of the evidence, that the agency did not reinstate him because of his

race, sex, or in reprisal for prior EEO activity.

The agency's decision finding no discrimination is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 26, 2002

__________________

Date