Kenneth M.,1 Complainant,v.Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security (Customs and Border Protection), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 9, 2016
0120162779 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 9, 2016)

0120162779

11-09-2016

Kenneth M.,1 Complainant, v. Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security (Customs and Border Protection), Agency.


U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

Kenneth M.,1

Complainant,

v.

Jeh Johnson,

Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security

(Customs and Border Protection),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120162779

Agency No. HS-CBP-25916-2016

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated August 2, 2016, dismissing his complaint alleging unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a CBP Officer at the Agency's Port of Detroit facility in Detroit, Michigan.

On April 9, 2016, Complainant filed a formal EEO complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discriminatory harassment on the basis of national origin (Albanian) when he was subjected to an Office of Inspector General investigation between July 2009 and July 12, 2012, (3 allegations); he was not selected for six different positions between July 28, 2014 and October 6, 2015 (6 allegations); in 2015, he was subjected to an Agency investigation; and on January 12, 2016, he was placed on administrative duties, relieved of his government service weapon, and issued a letter proposing his removal. In a second claim, Complainant alleged that, on May 31, 2016, he learned that the deciding official on the proposed removal decided to suspend him for five days.

The Agency dismissed the harassment claim (claim 1), pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO counselor contact. The Agency dismissed claim 2 because the matter was settled on June 13, 2016, pursuant to an "Abeyance Agreement."

The instant appeal followed. In his appeal, Complainant admits his EEO counselor contact was untimely, but states he was not aware of the EEO process. Complainant states that he agrees with the dismissal of claim 2. Therefore, we will not address the dismissal of claim 2 any further in this decision.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.

Here, the record discloses that the latest alleged discriminatory event occurred on January 12, 2016, but Complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until March 11, 2016, which is beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation period.

EEOC regulations provide that the agency or the Commission shall extend the time limits when the individual shows that he was not notified of the time limits and was not otherwise aware of them, that he did not know and reasonably should not have known that the discriminatory matter or personnel action occurred, that despite due diligence he was prevented by circumstances beyond his control from contacting the Counselor within the time limits, or for other reasons considered sufficient by the agency or the Commission.

Complainant, on appeal, admits his EEO counselor contact was late, but contends he was unaware of the 45-day limitation period. However, information in the record indicates that Complainant received No Fear training in 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2015, that included information on EEO counseling, and its relevant time deadlines. As such, we find that he was on notice regarding the EEO process. Complainant also states that after getting the proposal letter in January 2016, his focus was to work with the union to save his job. However, the Commission has consistently held that the utilization of agency procedures, union grievances, and other remedial processes does not toll the time limit for contacting an EEO Counselor. See Ellis v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01992093 (November 29, 2000).

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0416)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 � VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The requests may be submitted via regular mail to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013, or by certified mail to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)

If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 9, 2016

__________________

Date

1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120162779

2

0120162779