Kenneth L. Scott, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southwest Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 23, 2011
0120102994 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 23, 2011)

0120102994

11-23-2011

Kenneth L. Scott, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southwest Area), Agency.




Kenneth L. Scott,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Southwest Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120102994

Agency No. 1G-758-0004-10

DECISION

Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission concerning his complaint

of unlawful employment discrimination. For the reasons set forth, we

AFFIRM the Agency’s decision, dismissing the complaint.

BACKGROUND

The record reveals that, during the relevant time, Complainant was

employed as a Mail Handler at the Agency’s East Texas Processing and

Distribution Center in Tyler, Texas. EEO Counselor’s Report at 1.

Complainant sought EEO counseling and subsequently filed a formal

complaint. Complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination

on the basis of reprisal for prior EEO activity when, on March 2, 2010,

he was issued a 7-Day Suspension for Unacceptable Conduct and Failure

to Follow Instructions. On June 17, 2010, the Agency issued a decision

dismissing the complaint as moot.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(5) provides for

the dismissal of a complaint when the issues raised therein are moot.

To determine whether the issues raised in complainant’s complaint

are moot, the factfinder must ascertain whether (1) it can be said

with assurance that there is no reasonable expectation that the alleged

violation will recur; and (2) interim relief or events have completely

and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged discrimination.

See County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631 (1979); Kuo

v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05970343 (July 10, 1998).

When such circumstances exist, no relief is available and no need for

a determination of the rights of the parties is presented.

Upon review, the Commission finds that Complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed as moot. Specifically, the record reveals that

the issue was resolved prior to the filing of Complainant’s formal

complaint when the suspension was reduced to a discussion during the

grievance procedure. Thus, there is no reasonable expectation that the

alleged action will recur, and the interim relief has completely and

irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged violation. We note

that Complainant has not requested compensatory damages.

CONCLUSION

The Agency’s final decision dismissing Complainant’s complaint

is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 23, 2011

__________________

Date

2

0120102994

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120102994