Ken S. Glasgow, Complainant,v.Gale A. Norton, Secretary, Department of the Interior, Agency Appeal No. 01A03654 Agency Nos. FNP 95-100; FNP 96-041 Hearing Nos. 160-97-8140X; 160-97-8413X

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 8, 2002
01A03654 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 8, 2002)

01A03654

08-08-2002

Ken S. Glasgow, Complainant, v. Gale A. Norton, Secretary, Department of the Interior, Agency Appeal No. 01A03654 Agency Nos. FNP 95-100; FNP 96-041 Hearing Nos. 160-97-8140X; 160-97-8413X


Ken S. Glasgow v. Department of the Interior

01A03654

August 8, 2002

.

Ken S. Glasgow,

Complainant,

v.

Gale A. Norton,

Secretary,

Department of the Interior,

Agency

Appeal No. 01A03654

Agency Nos. FNP 95-100; FNP 96-041

Hearing Nos. 160-97-8140X; 160-97-8413X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts the complainant's

appeal from the agency's final order in the above-entitled matter.

The record reveals that complainant filed a formal EEO complaint

alleging that the agency had discriminated against him on the bases of

race (African), color (Black), national origin (Caribbean/British),

and in reprisal for prior protected activity when his verbal request

for an upgrade was denied in April 1995 and when the agency requested

he surrender his parking pass in December 1995. At the conclusion of

the investigation, complainant was provided a copy of the investigative

report and requested a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge.

The Administrative Judge issued a decision without a hearing, finding

no discrimination, which was adopted by the agency in its final order.

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration of

all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Commission

to affirm the agency's final order, because the Administrative

Judge's issuance of a decision without a hearing was appropriate

and a preponderance of the record evidence does not establish that

discrimination occurred.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 8, 2002

__________________

Date