Kelsey-Hayes Wheel Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJul 23, 194774 N.L.R.B. 603 (N.L.R.B. 1947) Copy Citation In the Matter of KELSEY-HAYES WHEEL COMPANY, EMPLOYER and PATTERN MAKERS ASSOCIATION OF DETROIT AND VICINITY, AFFILIATED WITH PATTERN MAKERS LEAGUE OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL, PETI- TIONER Case No. 7-R,9582.-Decided July 23, 1947 Messrs. Martin L. Butzel and Howard Bovee , of Detroit , Mich., for the Employer. Mr. George Q. Lynch,, of Washington , D. C., and Mr. Earnest J. Ross, of Detroit, Mich ., for the Petitioner. Mr. Harry South well, of Detroit, Mich., for the Intervenor. Mr. Jerome A . Reiner, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed, hearing in this case was held at Detroit, Michigan, on March 10, 1947, before Jerome H. Brooks, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from preju- dicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER Kelsey-Hayes Wheel Company, a Delaware corporation licensed to do business in the State of Michigan, maintains two plants in Detroit, Michigan,' and one plant in Jackson, Michigan, where it is engaged in the manufacture of automotive parts and products. During the year 1946, the Employer purchased raw materials, supplies, and equipment valued in excess of $1,000, of which approximately 50 percent was shipped to points outside the State of Michigan. In the same year the Employer sold finished products in excess of $1,000,000, of which ' These are known as the Military Plant and the McGraw Plant ; we are concerned here only with the McGraw plant. 74 N. L. R. B., No. 117. 603 604 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD approximately 50 percent was shipped to points outside the State of Michigan. - The Employer admits and we find that it is engaged in 'commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. H. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED The Petitioner is a labor organization affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, claiming to represent employees of the Employer. Local 174, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, herein called the In- tervenor, is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Indus- trial Organizations, claiming to represent employees of the Employer. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Employer refuses to recognize the Petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of employees of the Employer until the Petitioner has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Employer, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Petitioner seeks a unit of all pattern makers and apprentices employed by the Employer in its McGraw plant . The Intervenor contends that a more comprehensive industrial unit already established by a Board certification 2 and by a history of collective bargaining between the Employer and the Intervenor is the appropriate unit, and that a separate unit of pattern makers is inappropriate because the pattern makers' work is an integral part of production and main- tenance. Although the Employer takes a position of strict neutrality, it asserts that it would be more difficult administratively to bargain respecting the pattern makers if a separate unit of pattern makers is carved out of the present industrial unit. There are 11 pattern makers involved herein, 6 of whom are metal pattern makers and 5 of whom are wood pattern makers. These em- ployees work in departments separate from the other production workers and under separate supervision . Their work is highly tech- nical and requires exceptional skill . Although the pattern makers have on occasion been called upon to perform tasks outside the scope 2 16 N L R. B. 580. KELSEY-HAYES WHEEL COMPANY 605 of their usual duties, this is not a regular or frequent occurrence and it represents only a small fraction of their work. In December 1936 the Employer recognized the Intervenor as the bargaining representative of all the production and maintenance workers of its McGraw plant, the pattern makers being included in the unit. On December 26, 1939, following a Board election 3 in which the pattern makers participated, the Intervenor was certified as the exclusive bargaining representative of the employees of the Em- ployer in the afore-mentioned industrial unit.' Since 1936, when the Employer first recognized the Intervenor as exclusive bargaining reps resentative of its employees, there has never been a written contract between the Employer and the Intervenor. Instead, weekly written minutes were made of meetings between management and the Inter- venor at which the parties discussed grievances and other matters. There are 1,800 pattern makers in the Detroit area, 1,000 of whom work in jobbing shops and 800 of whom work in manufacturing shops. All of the jobbing shop pattern makers are hired through and belong to the Petitioner. Of the 800 pattern makers in the manufacturing shops, 200 belong to the Petitioner. The Employer's shop is a manu- facturing shop. The record indicates that the unit proposed by the Petitioner repre- sents a true craft such as the Board has often recognized; 5 and that a bargaining practice predicated upon craft units of pattern makers exists in the automotive industry in the Detroit area. In addition, the organization which seeks herein to represent the pattern makers is one which is established exclusively for pattern makers and which supplies the majority of pattern makers for the automotive industry in the Detroit area.° The pattern makers in the present case have never had an opportunity to express their sentiments as to representa- tion in a separate craft unit, and although they did vote in the 1939 Board election, nevertheless the Petitioner did not appear on that ballot and the issue of separate craft representation was not then be- fore the Board.7 Moreover, we do not feel that the history of collec- tive bargaining as conducted between the Intervenor and the Em- ployer, on an oral basis and without resort to a written contract em- bodying the terms agreed upon, is sufficiently compelling to preclude the establishment of pattern makers in a separate craft unit .8 3 See ni a 2, supra. 18 N. L R. B 698. See Matter of Kaiser -Frazer Corporation , 73 N. L It . B. 109 , and cases cited therein. ° Cf',Matter of L. L Shunk Latex Products, Inc, 67 N. L It. B 552. a Matter of National Aniline Division, Allied Chemical and Dye Corporation , 71 N L. R B 1217. 8 Matter of National Silver Company , 71 N L It . B 594 ; Matter of International Hari,ester Conipqny, 68 N L R B 383, 386, Matter of Hamilton-Scheu and Walsh Shoe Company, 66 N.'L It . B. 146, 148. 606 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD The pattern makers could therefore be properly represented in a separate craft unit of their own such as the Petitioner seeks, or could be bargained for in the more comprehensive industrial unit of pro- duction and maintenance employees now existing at the McGraw plant of the Employer. Under these circumstances, and inasmuch as they have never had an opportunity in a Board election to indicate whether they desire to be represented in a craft unit or in an industrial unit, we are of the opinion that they should now be given that oppor= tunity.° We shall, therefore, make no determination of the appro- priate unit at the present time but shall permit the scope of the unit or units to be determined in part by the results of an election in the voting group hereinafter set forth. If the pattern makers select the Peti- tioner; they will be taken to have indicated their desire to be established in a separate unit; if they select the Intervenor they will be taken to have indicated their desire to remain a part of the existing industrial unit. Accordingly, we shall direct that an election be held among all wood and metal pattern makers and their apprentices employed at the McGraw plant of the Employer, excluding the supervisors of the wood and metal pattern shops,10 and all other supervisory employees. DIRECTION OF ELECTION 17 As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Kelsey-Hayes Wheel Company, Detroit, Michigan, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Seventh Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Sections 203.55 and 203.56, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regula- tions-Series 4, among the employees in the voting group found ap- propriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay- roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, includ- ing employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they (were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States, who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding those employees who. 0 Matter of B F. Goodrich Company, 59 N. L. R. B . 1477; Matter of Kaiser-Frazer Cor- poration, 73 N. L. R. B. 109. 10 Earl Balsey and Jack Herdegen They are both salaried employees, assign work to. the pattern makers and inspect it ; they have disciplinary authority ; and they work only occasionally with tools . They are supervisory employees and, accordingly , we shall exclude them from the unit. t1 Any participant in the election herein may , upon its prompt request to and approval thereof by the Regional Director, have its name removed from the ballot. KELSEY-HAYES WHEEL COMPANY 607 have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to determine whether they desire to be represented by Pattern Makers Association of De- troit and Vicinity, affiliated with the Pattern Makers League of North America, AFL, or by Local 174, International Union, United Auto- mobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW-CIO, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. 755420-48-vol 74-40 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation