Kathleen J. Forbes, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Great Lakes/Midwest Areas), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 18, 2000
01a01293 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 18, 2000)

01a01293

04-18-2000

Kathleen J. Forbes, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Great Lakes/Midwest Areas), Agency.


Kathleen J. Forbes, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01A01293

) Agency No. 1-I-554-0040-98

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

(Great Lakes/Midwest Areas), )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999) (to

be codified and hereinafter referred to as EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(1)).<1> Complainant alleged that she was discriminated

against on the bases of sex (female), age (unspecified), and reprisal

(prior EEO activity) when, beginning in March 1998, and ongoing:

(1) dolls were used in a display during Women's History Month;

(2) minutes of the Diversity Committee meetings were not posted and

there was no open call for membership to the committee;

(3) a supervisor changed the "Blood Leave Policy."

Complainant alleged that these incidents constituted both disparate

treatment and, in the alternative, harassment based on a hostile work

environment. On appeal, no persuasive arguments or evidence have been

presented regarding whether complainant has stated a claim, i.e., to

show

that complainant was injured by the incident raised.<2> Accordingly, the

agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

April 18, 2000

________________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

1On November 9, 1999, revised

regulations governing the EEOC's federal sector complaint process

went into effect. These regulations apply to all federal sector

EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative process.

Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations found

at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.

2We note that with respect to complainant's retaliation claim, the

Commission interprets the statutory retaliation clauses "to prohibit

any adverse treatment that is based on a retaliatory motive and is

reasonably likely to deter the charging party or others from engaging

in protected activity." EEOC Compliance Manual, Section 8 (Retaliation)

at 8-13 - 8-14 (May 20, 1998).