Karen Y. Spears, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southeast Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 20, 2011
0120111144 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 20, 2011)

0120111144

12-20-2011

Karen Y. Spears, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southeast Area), Agency.




Karen Y. Spears,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Southeast Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120111144

Agency No. 1H301006610

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal1 with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated October 19, 2010, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., Section

501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a Mail Handler at the Agency’s P&DC facility in Atlanta, Georgia.

On September 16, 2010, filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency

subjected her to discrimination on the bases of race (“of color”),

disability (bursitis), and age (over 40). The Agency identified the

claims as: (1) from April 24, 2009 to January 9, 2010, she was complained

about and threatened about her work speed; (2) on August 5 and 11, 2009,

in meetings and discussions held prior to her shift, it was reported of

management’s intentions of getting rid of employees over 40; and (3)

on January 10, 2010, she was injured on the job and was not provided

a CA-1 form and not afforded medical attention. The Commission notes

that in her formal complaint, Complainant also raised the matter of

being issued a removal letter in June 2010, which the Agency failed to

recognize as part of the complaint.

The Agency dismissed the complaint, as it characterized it (without the

removal claim), pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to

state a claim. The instant complaint followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee

or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been

discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,

sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. §§

1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has

long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC

Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). When the complainant does not

allege he or she is aggrieved within the meaning of the regulations,

the agency shall dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1).

With regard to claims (1) and (2), the Agency correctly determined that

Complainant has not alleged that she was personally aggrieved by these

matters. With regard to claim (3), to the extent that Complainant is

raising matters related to Office of Worker’s Compensation Programs

claims and the failure to provide her with forms, such matters must be

raised with the Department of Labor. The Commission has held that an

employee cannot use the EEO complaint process to lodge a collateral

attack on another proceeding. See Wills v. Dep’t of Def., EEOC

Request No. 05970596 (July 30, 1998); Kleinman v. U.S. Postal Serv.,

EEOC Request No. 05940585 (Sept. 22, 1994); Lingad v. U.S. Postal Serv.,

EEOC Request No. 05930106 (June 25, 1993). Accordingly, we affirm the

Agency’s dismissal of these three claims.

However, the Agency failed to recognize that Complainant also

timely raised the matter of her removal in her formal complaint. The

Commission finds that a claim regarding a removal states a claim under

the EEOC regulations. See Diaz v. Dep’t of the Air Force, EEOC Request

No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's

complaint is affirmed in part, and the matter of Complainant’s removal

is REMANDED for further processing as set forth in the Order below.

ORDER (E0610)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claim concerning

Complainant’s removal in accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.108 et seq.

The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received

the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this

decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy

of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the

appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved

prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without

a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60)

days of receipt of Complainant’s request.

A copy of the Agency’s letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission’s corrective action is mandatory.

The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC

20013. The Agency’s report must contain supporting documentation, and

the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the

Agency does not comply with the Commission’s order, the Complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. §�

�1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission’s order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled “Right to File a Civil

Action.” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0610)

This decision affirms the Agency’s final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the Agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion of

your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion of the

complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative processing.

In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and

eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the

Agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until such time as the Agency

issues its final decision on your complaint. If you file a civil action,

you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the

official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his

or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department”

means the national organization, and not the local office, facility

or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider

and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the

administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 20, 2011

__________________

Date

1 The Commission notes that the appeal form and the “Privacy Act

Statement” used by Complainant carry an outdated address of the

Commission. The Agency is cautioned as to using documents with the

Commission’s outdated address.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120111144

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120111144