Karen D. Burns, Complainant,v.Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 20, 2002
01A14499_r (E.E.O.C. Mar. 20, 2002)

01A14499_r

03-20-2002

Karen D. Burns, Complainant, v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Karen D. Burns v. Department of Veterans Affairs

01A14499

March 20, 2002

.

Karen D. Burns,

Complainant,

v.

Anthony J. Principi,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A14499

Agency No. 200H-1989

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's June 28, 2001 decision

dismissing complainant's complaint was proper. In her complaint dated

April 5, 2001, complainant claims that she was discriminated against on

the bases of race (Black) and in retaliation for prior EEO activity when:

On June 28, 2000, the Director of Nursing and Nurse Manager told lies

to cover up their actions regarding complainant's time and attendance,

claiming that a written warning was not issued, claiming that complainant

was not placed on medical certification, and claiming that complainant

had volunteered to bring in a physician's note on June 6, 2000;

On June 6, 2000, the Acting Nurse Manager enforced the medical

certification that complainant had been put on, although it had been

rescinded;

On May 9, 2000, Nursing Management placed complainant on medical

certification based on a falsified attendance record;

On April 5, 2000, Nursing Management falsified complainant's time and

attendance records from October 1, 1999 through March 31, 2000; and

On April 5, 2000, Nursing Management issued complainant a written

warning regarding attendance.

In its decision, the agency dismissed claim 1 for failure to state a

claim, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1), and dismissed claims 2

through 5 for untimely EEO Counselor contact, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(2). The Commission finds that claim 1 was properly dismissed

for failure to state a claim and claims 2 - 5 were properly dismissed

for untimely EEO Counselor contact. Complainant was not aggrieved by

the incident in claim 1. The Commission finds that claims 2 - 5 were

not raised with an EEO Counselor until August 10, 2000, which is beyond

the 45 day limitation period set forth in 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1).

The agency's final decision to dismiss complainant's complaint is

AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 20, 2002

__________________

Date