Juventino Martin, Appellant,v.Janet Reno, Attorney General, Department of Justice, (Immigration and Naturalization Service), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 27, 1999
01981842 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 27, 1999)

01981842

01-27-1999

Juventino Martin, Appellant, v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Department of Justice, (Immigration and Naturalization Service), Agency.


Juventino Martin v. Department of Justice

01981842

January 27, 1999

Juventino Martin, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01981842

) Agency No. I-97-0059

)

Janet Reno, )

Attorney General, )

Department of Justice, )

(Immigration and Naturalization )

Service), )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

The Commission finds that the agency erred in its December 16, 1997

decision which dismissed appellant's complaint of discrimination, on

the grounds of failure to state a claim, pursuant to the provisions of

29 C.F.R.�1614.107(a).

The record shows that appellant alleged that he had been discriminated

against on the bases of sex (male) and national origin (Hispanic) when he

was selected under the Bilingual-Bicultural Authority for the position

of District Adjudications Officer, GS-1801-5, while similarly situated

white females were selected at the GS-7 level. The agency dismissed the

complaint on the basis of failure to state a claim after finding that

the person selected at the GS-7 level was an Immigration Inspector "which

bears a different job title and series than the position at issue".

A review of complainant's claim persuades the Commission that it was

improperly dismissed. The agency should have investigated this complaint

and not dismissed it for failure to state a claim: the only questions for

the agency to consider are whether appellant claims that he is aggrieved

and whether the complaint alleges employment discrimination on a basis

covered by EEO statutes. If the answer is yes, then the agency must

accept the complaint for processing, regardless of what it thought of

the merits. Odoski v. Department of Energy, EEOC Appeal No. 01901496

(April 16, 1990). Appellant claims that he, a male Hispanic employee

was selected at the GS-5 level while white females were selected at

the GS-7 level. This is sufficient under Odoski to state a claim under

EEOC Regulations. Accordingly, the complaint was improperly dismissed

by the agency and the final agency decision is REVERSED. The complaint

is REMANDED for further processing in accordance with this decision and

applicable regulations.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to process the complaint pursuant to the provisions

of 29 C.F.R.�1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant that

it has received the complaint within thirty (30) calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to appellant

a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant of the

appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved

prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision without

a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60)

days of receipt of appellant's request. A copy of the agency's letter of

acknowledgment to appellant and a copy of the notice that transmits the

investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance

officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to

File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil

action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is

subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16� (Supp. V 1993).

If the appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �l6l4.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

January 27, 1999

DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations