Julio L. Carlo, Jr.v.United States Postal Service 01A30301 March 13, 2003 . Julio L. Carlo, Jr., Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 13, 2003
01a30301_r (E.E.O.C. Mar. 13, 2003)

01a30301_r

03-13-2003

Julio L. Carlo, Jr. v. United States Postal Service 01A30301 March 13, 2003 . Julio L. Carlo, Jr., Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Julio L. Carlo, Jr. v. United States Postal Service

01A30301

March 13, 2003

.

Julio L. Carlo, Jr.,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A30301

Agency No. 4-G-780-0208-00

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's decision not to

reinstate complainant's complaint of unlawful employment discrimination

that the parties had settled is proper. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504.

On June 22, 2000, the parties entered into a settlement agreement

resolving the complaint. The settlement agreement provided that:

It is hereby agreed that [an identified management official] will provide

[complainant] 204-B training within the CFS union beginning August

26, 2000. This training will last for a 90-day period.

On August 14, 2002, complainant alleged that the agency breached the

settlement agreement when he was denied 204-B training from June 2001 to

July 2002. Complainant also indicated that a supervisor made derogatory

statements about complainant's 204-B training and his qualification for

that training after the settlement agreement. After a review of the

record, undisputed by complainant, the Commission finds that complainant

received 204-B training from August 28, 2000 through November 29, 2000, in

accordance with the settlement agreement. Since the settlement agreement

does not address alleged derogatory remarks and does not provide for

complainant's 204-B training from June 2001 to July 2002, the Commission

finds that these matters are beyond the scope of the settlement agreement.

If complainant wishes to pursue this claim of denied training and

derogatory remarks as a separate complaint of discrimination, then he

should initiate contact with an EEO Counselor within 15 days after he

receives this decision. The Commission does not address whether such a

complaint would state a claim or whether such claims are timely raised

with an EEO Counselor.

Accordingly, the agency's decision is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 13, 2003

__________________

Date