Judy A. Vetter, Complainant,v.Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 15, 2000
01990924 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 15, 2000)

01990924

02-15-2000

Judy A. Vetter, Complainant, v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Judy A. Vetter v. Department of Veterans Affairs

01990924

February 15, 2000

Judy A. Vetter, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01990924

)

Togo D. West, Jr., )

Secretary, )

Department of Veterans Affairs, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

On October 6, 1998, complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission

from a final agency decision (FAD) received by her on October 10, 1998,

pertaining to her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in

violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42

U.S.C. �2000e et seq.<1> In her complaint, complainant alleged that she

was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race and reprisal when:

on June 16, 1998, she received a harassing email message with a

"racial implication;" and

the September 19, 1991 settlement agreement between the parties became

public knowledge and contributed to this incident of harassment.

The agency dismissed complainant's complaint pursuant to Volume

64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)) for failure to state

a claim. Specifically, the agency determined that complainant had

not been aggrieved by the incident described in allegation (1) of

her complaint. The agency found that complainant suffered no personal

loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of her employment.

The agency determined that in allegation (2) complainant alleged, in

essence, that the agency had breached the September 19, 1991 settlement

agreement between the parties which contributed to the incident complained

of in allegation (1). The agency determined that complainant's breach

allegation should properly have been brought to the attention of the

EEO Director in accordance with EEOC regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.504.

Upon review, we find that the agency properly dismissed complainant's

complaint for failure to state a claim. It is the decision of this

Commission that complainant was not aggrieved within the meaning of EEOC

regulations, by the incident described in allegation (1). The Commission

has repeatedly found that remarks or comments unaccompanied by a concrete

agency action are not a direct and personal deprivation sufficient to

render an individual aggrieved for the purposes of Title VII. See Backo

v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05960227 (June 10,

1996); Henry v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05940695

(February 9, 1995).

The record indicates that complainant was not harmed with respect to a

term, condition, or privilege of her employment.

The regulation set forth at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,660 (1999) (to

be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.504(a))

provides that where the complainant believes that the agency has failed

to comply with the terms of a settlement agreement, she shall notify

the EEO Director, in writing, of the alleged noncompliance within 30

days of when the complainant knew or should have known of the alleged

noncompliance. The regulation further provides that the complainant

may request that the terms of the agreement be specifically implemented,

or the complaint reinstated.

In the instant matter, allegation (2) of complainant's complaint

alleges that the incident described in allegation (1) would not have

occurred but for the breach of the September 1991 agreement between

the parties. In that regard, we agree with the decision of the agency

that complainant's allegation of non-compliance should have been brought

to the attention of the agency's EEO Director, and addressed within

the context of the prior complaint. For the reasons set forth herein,

we AFFIRM the agency's decision dismissing complainant's complaint for

failure to state a claim.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1199)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS

OF RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See

64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405). All requests and arguments must be

submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the

absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed

timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration

of the applicable filing period. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604).

The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the

other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S1199)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole

discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not

extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and

the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the

paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

February 15, 2000

_________________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_______________ _____________________________

Date Equal Employment Assistant

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.