Joseph K. Fitzpatrick, Appellant,v.F. Whitten Peters, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 10, 1999
01985870 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 10, 1999)

01985870

09-10-1999

Joseph K. Fitzpatrick, Appellant, v. F. Whitten Peters, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.


Joseph K. Fitzpatrick v. Department of the Air Force

01985870

September 10, 1999

Joseph K. Fitzpatrick, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01985870

) Agency No. LAOJ98057

F. Whitten Peters, )

Acting Secretary, )

Department of the Air Force, )

Agency. )

______________________________)

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that appellant's complaint was properly

dismissed pursuant to EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(b), for untimely

EEO contact. Appellant contacted an EEO Counselor on May 6, 1997,

regarding incidents of alleged discrimination commencing in May 1985, up

to and including his separation from agency employment in November 1985;

and various purported post-employment agency actions including matters

relating to an injury claim and a Freedom of Information Act request,

from 1986 through November 1994.

On appeal, appellant argues that his delay in contacting an EEO

Counselor was attributable to agency negligence "coupled with [his]

mental infirmity." We have consistently held, in cases involving

physical or mental health difficulties, that an extension is warranted

only where an individual is so incapacitated by his condition that

he is unable to meet the regulatory time limits. See Crear v. United

States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05920700 (October 29, 1992);

Weinberger v. Department of the Army, EEOC Request No. 05920040 (February

21, 1992); Hickman v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05910707

(September 30, 1991); Johnson v. Department of Health and Human Services,

EEOC Request No. 05900873 (October 5, 1990); and Zelmer v. United States

Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05890164 (March 8, 1989). The Commission

finds, however, that the record in this case is insufficient to establish

that appellant was so incapacitated as to be unable to timely contact an

EEO Counselor. Furthermore, appellant failed to present any evidence to

support his contention of agency negligence. Accordingly, the agency's

final decision dismissing appellant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT

IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a

civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your

complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

Sept. 10, 1999

__________________________________

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations