Joseph G. Pone, Complainant,v.Hershel W. Gober, Acting Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 21, 2000
01a02103 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 21, 2000)

01a02103

11-21-2000

Joseph G. Pone, Complainant, v. Hershel W. Gober, Acting Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Joseph G. Pone v. Department of Veterans Affairs

01A02103

11-21-00

.

Joseph G. Pone,

Complainant,

v.

Hershel W. Gober,

Acting Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A02103

Agency Nos. 96-1206

97-0449

Hearing Nos. 140-96-8189X

140-97-8201X

DISMISSAL

On January 14, 2000, complainant filed an appeal with this Commission

from a final agency decision (FAD), dated October 21, 1999, finding no

discrimination.<1> By regulation, appeals to the Commission must be

filed within thirty (30) calendar days after a complainant receives the

final agency decision. Appeals are deemed filed on the date received by

the Commission, unless postmarked earlier. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(b).

29 C.F.R. � 1614.605(d) provides, in pertinent part, that when a

complainant designates an attorney as representative, service of documents

and decisions on the complainant shall be made on the attorney and not

on the complainant, and time frames for receipt of materials by the

complainant shall be computed from the time of receipt by the attorney.

In this case, the record indicates that complainant's attorney

received the final agency decision on November 2, 1999.<2> Therefore,

complainant's appeal, on January 14, 2000, was beyond the thirty (30)

day time limit set by the Regulations. A review of the agency's final

decision indicates that complainant's attorney was informed about the

thirty (30) day time limitation period. On appeal, neither complainant,

nor his attorney offered an explanation regarding the untimely filing

of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as untimely.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__11-21-00____________________________

Date

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply

to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.

2The record contains a copy of a certified mail return receipt that

indicates complainant's attorney received the final agency decision

at her office on November 2, 1999. Complainant received a copy of the

final decision on December 15, 1999.