Jose L. Sanchez-Garcia, Complainant,v.Thomas J. Ridge, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 23, 2004
07A30063 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 23, 2004)

07A30063

03-23-2004

Jose L. Sanchez-Garcia, Complainant, v. Thomas J. Ridge, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.


Jose L. Sanchez-Garcia v. Department of Homeland Security

07A30063

March 23, 2004

.

Jose L. Sanchez-Garcia,

Complainant,

v.

Thomas J. Ridge,

Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security,

Agency.

Appeal No. 07A30063

Agency Nos. I-01-H015, I-01-H022<1>

Hearing Nos. 110-A2-8309X, 110-A2-8046X

DECISION

Following its January 6, 2003 final order, the agency filed a timely

appeal which the Commission accepts pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.

On appeal, the agency requests that the Commission affirm its rejection

of an EEOC Administrative Judge's (AJ) award of $4,875.00 in attorney's

fees following a finding by the AJ that the agency discriminated against

complainant on the basis of reprisal when he was removed from a detail.

The agency accepted the AJ's decision in all other respects but reduced

the attorney's fees award to $696.43. We therefore shall address only

the issue of attorney's fees in this decision. For the following reasons,

the Commission AFFIRMS the agency's final order.

Complainant submitted a "billing worksheet" from his attorney listing

a total of $4,875.00, based on 19.5 hours of work at $250.00 per hour.

We note initially that the agency does not argue that the hourly rate

is unreasonable. Instead, the agency argues that the billing worksheet

does not clearly identify the nature of the work performed and that

complainant's attorney did not participate in the hearing "and therefore

had little, if any, impact on the outcome of this case." See Memorandum

Explaining the Final Order, p. 6. Furthermore, the agency argues,

complainant filed two EEO complaints with a total of seven issues, but

he prevailed on only one issue, with the AJ dismissing the remaining

six. Id. Therefore, the agency argues, complainant is only entitled

to one-seventh of the $4,875.00, for a total of $696.43.

Complainant on appeal has not disputed the agency's calculations or its

reasoning in reaching the above figure. A review of the billing worksheet

confirms that it does not identify the nature or the work performed.

For example most of the entries merely state "call client," "draft

motion," and "conference [with] client," without explaining the subject

matter of the various telephone conversations, motions, or conferences.

Given the fact that complainant only prevailed on one issue, and the lack

of specificity in the billing worksheet, we find the award of $696.43

in attorney's fees was appropriate.

Therefore, after a careful review of the record, including arguments

and evidence not specifically discussed in this decision, the Commission

affirms the agency's final order.

ORDER

(1) The agency, if it has not already done so, shall offer to place

complainant in the next available detail assignment similar to the one

he was denied. Complainant shall be given a minimum of fifteen (15)

days from receipt of the offer of placement within which to accept or

decline the offer. Failure to accept the offer within the time period

set by the agency will be considered a rejection of the offer, unless

complainant can show that circumstances beyond his control prevented a

response within the time limit.

(2) Within sixty (60) days of this decision becoming final, the agency,

if it has not

already done so, shall pay complainant $3000.00 in non-pecuniary

compensatory damages.

(3) Within sixty (60) days of this decision becoming final, the agency,

if it has not already done so, shall pay complainant $696.43 in attorney's

fees.

(4) Within (60) days of this decision becoming final, the agency, if

it has not already done so, shall train the second line supervisor who

rescinded complainant's detail in the area of retaliation and reprisal

under Title VII.

(5) If it has not already done so, the agency shall consider taking

disciplinary action against the second line supervisor. The agency shall

report its decision. If the agency decides to take disciplinary action,

it shall identify the action taken. If the agency decides not to take

disciplinary action, it shall set forth the reason(s) for its decision

not to impose discipline.

(6) The agency is further directed to submit a report of compliance, as

provided in the statement entitled �Implementation of the Commission's

Decision.� The report shall include supporting documentation verifying

that the correction action has been implemented.

POSTING ORDER (G0900)

The agency is ordered to post at its Border Patrol Academy at the Federal

Law Enforcement Training Center in Glynco, Georgia, copies of the attached

notice. Copies of the notice, after being signed by the agency's duly

authorized representative, shall be posted by the agency within thirty

(30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, and shall

remain posted for sixty (60) consecutive days, in conspicuous places,

including all places where notices to employees are customarily posted.

The agency shall take reasonable steps to ensure that said notices are not

altered, defaced, or covered by any other material. The original signed

notice is to be submitted to the Compliance Officer at the address cited

in the paragraph entitled "Implementation of the Commission's Decision,"

within ten (10) calendar days of the expiration of the posting period.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 23, 2004

__________________

Date

POSTED BY ORDER OF THE

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

An Agency of the United States Government

This Notice is posted pursuant to an Order by the United States Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission dated which found that a

violation of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. (Title VII), has occurred at this facility.

Federal law requires that there be no discrimination against any employee

or applicant for employment because of the person's RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,

SEX, NATIONAL ORIGIN, AGE, or DISABILITY with respect to hiring, firing,

promotion, compensation, or other terms, conditions or privileges of

employment. The Border Patrol Academy at the Federal Law Enforcement

Training Center, Glynco, Georgia, confirms its commitment to comply with

these statutory provisions.

The Border Patrol Academy at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center,

Glynco, Georgia, supports and will comply with such Federal law and will

not take action against individuals because they have exercised their

rights under law.

The Border Patrol Academy at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center,

Glynco, Georgia, has been found to have retaliated against an employee

when the agency recalled him from a detail assignment. The Border Patrol

Academy at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, Glynco, Georgia,

has been ordered to provide compensatory damages to the affected employee

and provide training regarding reprisal under Title VII to appropriate

managers. The Border Patrol Academy at the Federal Law Enforcement

Training Center, Glynco, Georgia, will ensure that officials responsible

for personnel decisions and terms and conditions of employment will abide

by the requirements of all Federal equal employment opportunity laws.

The Border Patrol Academy at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center,

Glynco, Georgia, will not in any manner restrain, interfere, coerce,

or retaliate against any individual who exercises his or her right to

oppose practices made unlawful by, or who participates in proceedings

pursuant to, Federal equal employment opportunity law.

_______________________________

Date Posted: ____________________

Posting Expires: ________________

29 C.F.R. Part 1614

1We note that complainant initially filed this complaint with the

Immigration and Naturalization Service which has since been subsumed by

the agency.