01a01264
08-17-2000
Johnny Scroggins, Complainant, v. F. Whitten Peters, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.
Johnny Scroggins v. Department of the Air Force
01A01264
August 17, 2000
.
Johnny Scroggins,
Complainant,
v.
F. Whitten Peters,
Acting Secretary,
Department of the Air Force,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A01264
Agency No. 9V1M99503
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from an agency
decision dated November 5, 1999, dismissing his complaint of unlawful
employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and Section
501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,
29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.<1> In his complaint, complainant alleged that
he was subjected to discrimination on the bases of physical disability
(former chemical dependence, treated as chemically dependent), national
origin (Native American), and in reprisal for prior EEO activity when:
Effective August 2, 1999, complainant was suspended from employment, and
The EEO Counselor has harassed and retaliated against complainant by
failing to accept and process complainant's case asserting that he was
not advised of the basis of the complaint.
The agency dismissed complainant's complaint pursuant to the regulation
set forth at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999) (to be codified and
hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2)), for untimely EEO
Counselor contact. The agency stated that complainant contacted the EEO
office on August 27, 1999, and provided a designation of representation
form. The agency claimed, however, that complainant did not provide
relevant information to the EEO Counselor, namely a description of the
issues and basis for the contact with the counselor. The agency stated
that complainant first identified the basis and issues of his complaint
on October 12, 1999, the date he filed his formal complaint. Thus,
the agency argued that complainant's initial counselor contact was on
October 12, 1999, sixty-one days after the alleged discriminatory action.
On appeal, complainant states that he contacted the EEO office on August
27, 1999, and advised the office that he wished to file an EEO complaint
concerning his suspension for fourteen days effective August 2, 1999.
Complainant states that at this time he advised the counselor that he
sought to process a complaint of discrimination based on his disability.
In addition, complainant states that he met with the EEO Counselor for a
second time on September 13, 1999, and again advised the counselor that
he was alleging disability discrimination.
The record reveals that complainant contacted the EEO office on August
27, 1999. According to the counselor's report, complainant showed the
counselor a copy of the letter of suspension and gave the counselor a
designation of representation form. On August 31, 1999, the counselor
sent complainant's representative a letter scheduling a meeting between
complainant, complainant's representative, and the counselor to advise
complainant about his rights and responsibilities regarding the EEO
complaint process and to obtain �specific information regarding the
concrete actions that occurred within forty-five calendar days from
contact with this EEO office.� The record reveals that on September
13, 1999, complainant again met with the EEO Counselor and at this time
signed the rights and responsibilities forms. On September 27, 1999,
complainant received the Notice of Final Interview and Notice of Right
to File a formal complaint. Complainant filed his formal complaint on
October 12, 1999.
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of
discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment
Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the
matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel
action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.
The Commission has adopted a "reasonable suspicion" standard (as opposed
to a "supportive facts" standard) to determine when the forty-five (45)
day limitation period is triggered. See Howard v. Department of the Navy,
EEOC Request No. 05970852 (February 11, 1999). Thus, the time limitation
is not triggered until a complainant reasonably suspects discrimination,
but before all the facts that support a charge of discrimination have
become apparent.
EEOC Regulations provide that the agency or the Commission shall extend
the time limits when the individual shows that he was not notified of the
time limits and was not otherwise aware of them, that he did not know
and reasonably should not have known that the discriminatory matter or
personnel action occurred, that despite due diligence he was prevented
by circumstances beyond his control from contacting the Counselor within
the time limits, or for other reasons considered sufficient by the agency
or the Commission.
In the present case, we find that the agency improperly dismissed
complainant's complaint for untimely EEO Counselor contact. It is clear
that complainant contacted the EEO office on August 27, 1999, presented
a letter of suspension effective August 2, 1999, to the counselor, and
submitted his designation of representative form. Although the agency
argues that complainant did not clearly identify the basis and issues
of his complaint, we find that complainant contacted the EEO office and
exhibited an intent to begin the EEO process. Allen v. United States
Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05950933 (July 9, 1996). In addition,
we note that complainant was advised in writing of his rights and
responsibilities pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999) (to
be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(b)) and
signed the rights and responsibilities forms at a second meeting with
the EEO Counselor on September 13, 1999.
Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss complainant's complaint
was improper and is REVERSED and the complaint is REMANDED for further
processing in accordance with the Order below.
ORDER (E0400)
The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded claims in accordance with
64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656-7 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108). The agency shall acknowledge to
the complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty
(30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency
shall issue to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall
notify complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty
(150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the
matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant
requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue
a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's
request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a
copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of
rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The
report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the
complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order,
the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order.
29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a
civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior
to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408), and 29 C.F.R. �
1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a
civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph
below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407
and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the
underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �
2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the complainant files a civil action, the
administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for
enforcement, will be terminated. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999)
(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409).
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0300)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED
WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF
RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred
to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management
Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).
All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must
also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0400)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date
that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date
you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN
THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT
HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
August 17, 2000
__________________
Date
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision
was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify
that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative
(if applicable), and the agency on:
__________________
Date
______________________________
1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all
federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative
process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations
found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the
present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.