01981088
01-27-1999
John W. Garapich, Appellant, v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.
John W. Garapich, )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01981088
) Agency No. DON97-00244-014
Richard J. Danzig, )
Secretary, )
Department of the Navy, )
Agency. )
)
DISMISSAL OF APPEAL
Appellant filed an appeal with this Commission from a final decision of
the agency concerning his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination
in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of
1967, as amended (ADEA) 29 U.S.C. �621 et seq. The final decision was
issued on October 21, 1997. The appeal was faxed to the Commission
on November 25, 1997.
On August 25, 1997, appellant filed a formal complaint, alleging that
he was the victim of unlawful employment discrimination on the bases of
age and reprisal.
On October 21, 1997, the agency issued a final decision. Therein, the
agency found that appellant's formal complaint was comprised of four
allegations, that were identified in the following fashion:
1. On April 7, 14, and 21, 1997, [appellant] was subjected to a hostile
work environment when his immediate Supervisor, the Site Director, told
several off-color and offensive jokes at meetings at which [appellant]
was present.
2. On unspecified dates, [appellant] feels he has been the victim of a
conspiracy between his immediate Supervisor and the chain-of-command,
up to and including, the Commanding Officer. The record contains an
EEO Counselor Report which indicates that this allegation relates to a
purported conspiracy by upper management to set appellant up for failure
by passing down negative feedback; moving his office; and changing his
duties as directed by agency officials.
3. On an unspecified date in June 1997, [appellant] received performance
standards that suggested he needed to "get rid of the old guys that
needed to retire."
4. On July 15, 1997, [appellant] received a Fully Satisfactory (Level
3) performance rating from his immediate Supervisor, while all other
employees of his component received an Outstanding (Level 5) rating.
The agency accepted allegations 1 and 4 for investigation. The agency
dismissed allegations 3 and 4 for failure to state a claim.
By letter dated January 7, 1999, the agency notified the Commission
that appellant filed a civil action in U.S. District Court regarding
the matters raised in his formal complaint. With its letter, the agency
enclosed a copy of a civil complaint filed by appellant on November 4,
1998 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
(civil case number 98CV 2024JM LAB). Therein, appellant raised the same
matters that were contained in his EEO complaint, discussed above.
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.410 provides that the filing of a
civil action �shall terminate Commission processing of the appeal.�
Commission regulations mandate dismissal of the EEO complaint under these
circumstances so as to prevent a complainant from simultaneously pursuing
both administrative and judicial remedies on the same matters, wasting
resources, and creating the potential for inconsistent or conflicting
decisions, and in order to grant due deference to the authority of federal
district court. See Stromgren v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC
Request No. 05891079 (May 7, 1990); Sandy v. Department of Justice, EEOC
Appeal No. 01893513 (October 19, 1989); Kotwitz v. USPS, EEOC Request
No. 05880114 (October 25, 1988). Accordingly, appellant's appeal is
hereby DISMISSED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for
reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)
It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file
a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN
NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.
You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have
interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that
a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the
date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action
is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)
CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult
an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction
in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,
YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE
OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS
OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in
the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the
national organization, and not the local office, facility or department
in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a
civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative
processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file
a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be
filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right
to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
Jan. 27, 1999
DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director
Office of Federal Operations