John P. Rowland, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 2, 1999
01983344 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 2, 1999)

01983344

06-02-1999

John P. Rowland, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


John P. Rowland v. United States Postal Service

01983344

June 2, 1999

John P. Rowland, )

Appellant, )

)

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01983344

) Agency No. 4H-335-0025-98

)

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

______________________________)

DECISION

Based on a review of the record, we find that the agency properly

dismissed appellant's complaint, pursuant to EEOC Regulation 29

U.S.C. �1614.107(b), for failure to file a formal complaint in a timely

manner. Appellant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on

the bases of race (White), sex (male), and physical disability (plantar

fasciitis, cacaneal fasciitis) when on September 8, 1997, he was sent

to work at another work location and forced to work outside the work

facility.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(b) provides that the agency shall

dismiss a complaint or a portion of a complaint that fails to comply

with the applicable time limits contained in �1614.106, which, in turn,

requires the filing of a written complaint with an appropriate agency

official within fifteen (15) calendar days after the date of receipt of

the notice of the right to file a complaint.

The record in this case indicates that appellant received a notice of

the right to file a formal discrimination complaint on November 7, 1997.

The notice informed appellant that he had fifteen days from the date of

receipt of the notice in which to file a formal complaint. The record

further reflects that appellant did not file a formal complaint within

fifteen days of his receipt of this notice but, instead filed the formal

complaint on December 2, 1997. On appeal, appellant asserts that his

representative told him that he had made arrangements for an extension

of the limitation period. However, a complainant is responsible

for proceeding with the complaint at all times, whether or not the

complainant has designated a representative. 29 C.F.R. �1614.605(e). If a

complainant or the complainant's representative does not file an appeal

within the designated time limit, the appeal is untimely and will be

dismissed by the Commission unless the principles of waiver, estoppel

or equitable tolling apply. 29 C.F.R. ��1614.403(c), 1614.604(c); see

also Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89, 95-96 (1990);

Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 455 U.S. 385, 398 (1982). In the

instant case, we find appellant's justification for his untimeliness

insufficient to extend the applicable time limit. Accordingly, we

find that the agency's final decision dismissing appellant's complaint

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(b) was proper, and it is AFFIRMED for

the reasons set forth herein.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT

IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

June 2, 1999

____________________________

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations