John J. Williams, Jr., Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 28, 2000
01992248 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 28, 2000)

01992248

02-28-2000

John J. Williams, Jr., Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


John J. Williams, Jr., )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01992248

) Agency No. 4-G-700-0233-98

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

______________________________)

DECISION

We find that the agency's January 8, 1999 decision dismissing

Complainant's complaint on the grounds of failure to state a claim and

untimely EEO counselor contact is proper pursuant to the provisions

of 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) and (2). <1>

The record shows that Complainant sought EEO counseling, alleging that he

had been discriminated against on the bases of race, age, and reprisal

when:

(1) on or about February 5, 1998, he became aware that a certified letter

and a registered letter had not been delivered;

(2) on May 5, 1998, he became aware that someone may have impersonated

a federal judge at a conference he attended and a return receipt was

held for about two months;

(3) on June 1, 1995, he was forced to retire; and

(4) it was taking too long to process his EEO complaints. Subsequently

Complainant filed a formal complaint of discrimination concerning these

issues.

The record further reflects that Complainant's initial EEO Counselor

contact regarding claims (1), (2), and (4), occurred on May 5, 1998;

and that the initial EEO Counselor regarding claim (2) occurred on or

about August 12, 1996.

The agency issued a final decision dismissing all the allegations raised

in the complaint. Allegations (1) and (3) were dismissed on the grounds

of untimely EEO counselor contact. Allegations (2) and (4) were dismissed

on the basis of failure to state a claim.

Allegations (1) and (3) concern incidents that allegedly occurred on

February 5, 1998, and June 1, 1995, respectively. Complainant's EEO

counselor contacts were beyond the 45-day time limit provided by EEOC

Regulations. Accordingly, allegations (1) and (3) were properly dismissed

on the basis of untimely EEO counselor contact.

Concerning allegation (2), we agree with the agency's finding that

Complainant has failed to show that he was aggrieved because he has

failed to provide sufficient evidence that the terms, conditions or

privileges of his employment were harmed by the alleged incidents.

Allegation (4) was also properly dismissed by the agency on the grounds

of failure to state a claim. Accordingly, the final agency decision

is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1199)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS

OF RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See

64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405). All requests and arguments must be

submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the

absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed

timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration

of the applicable filing period. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604).

The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the

other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S1199)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

February 28, 2000

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_____________

__________________________________

DATE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT

ASSISTANT 1 On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's

federal sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations

apply to all Federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the

revised regulations found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable,

in deciding the present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also

be found at the Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.