John F. Kierod, Complainant,v.Robert E. Rubin, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 19, 1999
01983744 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 19, 1999)

01983744

11-19-1999

John F. Kierod, Complainant, v. Robert E. Rubin, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.


John F. Kierod, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01983744

) Agency No. 98-3114

Robert E. Rubin, )

Secretary, )

Department of the Treasury, )

Agency. )

_______________________________ )

DECISION

Complainant filed the instant appeal from the agency's April 1, 1998

dismissal of complainant's complaint for failing to state a claim pursuant

to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37656 (to be codified as and hereinafter cited

as 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1)) for stating the same claim that has been

settled.<1>

The record shows that complainant and the agency entered a settlement

agreement on May 14, 1997 in which complainant agreed to withdraw his

informal complaint of discrimination filed on November 1, 1996 and the

agency agreed to the following:

Per your request for reasonable accommodations, ACS II Branch agrees

to permanently reassign you from a GS-7, Tax Examiner Assistant, to a

permanent GS-4, Tax Examining Clerk, in Accounting Branch, effective

May 25, 1997.

Complainant filed the instant EEO complaint on February 13, 1998 in

which he claimed that he was discriminated against on the bases of

race and disability. While complainant did not clearly state what

he is claiming in the instant EEO complaint<2>, the Commission finds

that complainant appears to be claiming that the agency breached the

settlement agreement and/or is raising the same claim as he raised in

his informal complaint dated November 1, 1996 (which was settled).

To the extent that complainant is attempting to raise in the instant

EEO complaint the same claims of discrimination that were settled

in the May 14, 1997 settlement agreement, we find that the agency

properly dismissed the instant complaint as stating the same claim that

was settled. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a); 64 Fed. Reg 37,644, 37,660

(1999) (to be codified as and hereinafter cited as 29 C.F.R. �1614.504)

(settlement agreements are binding).

To the extent that complainant is attempting to claim that the agency

breached the agreement, we find that the filing of a complaint

of discrimination under the regulation set forth at 64 Fed. Reg

37,644, 37,656 (1999) (to be codified as and hereinafter cited as 29

C.F.R. �1614.106) is not the proper procedure. The proper procedure

for filing a breach of settlement agreement is set forth in �1614.504.

If a complainant believes that the agency has failed to comply with the

terms of a settlement agreement, then the complainant shall notify the

EEO Director of the alleged noncompliance "within 30 days of when the

complainant knew or should have known of the alleged noncompliance."

29 C.F.R. �1614.504(a). The complainant may request that the terms of

the settlement agreement be specifically implemented or request that

the complaint be reinstated for further processing from the point

processing ceased. Id. If complainant wants to pursue a breach of

settlement allegation, then complainant should contact the EEO Director

pursuant to �1614.504(a). The Commission does not address whether such

a claim could now be timely or whether such a claim has already been

raised with and decided by the agency.

The agency's dismissal of the complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1199)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS

OF RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See

64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.405). All requests and arguments must be

submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the

absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed

timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration

of the applicable filing period. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.604).

The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the

other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend

your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

November 19, 1999

DATE

Carlton

M.

Hadden,

Acting

Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_________________________

__________________________1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations

governing the EEOC's federal sector complaint process went into effect.

These regulations apply to all Federal sector EEO complaints pending at

any stage in the administrative process. Consequently, the Commission

will apply the revised regulations found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999),

where applicable, in deciding the present appeal. The regulations,

as amended, may also be found at the Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.

2In the section of the complaint where the claims are to be listed

complainant wrote "see attached." There are various letters and documents

attached to the formal complaint.