Jesse Garcia, Jr., Complainant,v.Ray H. LaHood, Secretary, Department of Transportation, (Federal Aviation Administration), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 12, 2011
0120112725 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 12, 2011)

0120112725

10-12-2011

Jesse Garcia, Jr., Complainant, v. Ray H. LaHood, Secretary, Department of Transportation, (Federal Aviation Administration), Agency.




Jesse Garcia, Jr.,

Complainant,

v.

Ray H. LaHood,

Secretary,

Department of Transportation,

(Federal Aviation Administration),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120112725

Agency No. 201023552FAA05

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated March 15, 2011, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and

Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as

amended, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that

Complainant's complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §�

�1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant was a

former Engineering Technician at the Agency’s Mike Monroney Aeronautical

Center facility in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

On January 11, 2011, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging

that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of race

(Asian), national origin (Hispanic), disability (ADD), and reprisal for

prior protected EEO activity under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964 when:

1. in April and May 2008, he was forced to work despite having suffered

a painful on- the-job injury;

2. in May 2008, his team lead spit on him;

3. he was terminated from his position of Engineering technician on

November 4, 2008;

4. in November 2008, in his last paycheck, he was denied 15 hours of

overtime that he had earned; and

5. in or around February 2009, the Agency notified him that he was

expected to pay back 30 hours of overtime pay.

Reasoning the Complainant’s initial contact with an EEO counselor on

these matters occurred on September 3, 2010, a year and a half after the

latest alleged event in February 2009, the Agency dismissed the matter

for failure to contact an EEO counselor in a timely manner. The Agency

also dismissed claims 2 and 3 as identical to those raised in an earlier

complaint (Agency No. 2009-22391-FAA-05). The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) provides that

the Agency shall dismiss a complaint that states the same claim that

is pending before or has been decided by the Agency or Commission.

The record established that Complainant had previously contacted an

EEO counselor in November 2008, and raised his termination and the

events leading up to it. In January 2009, he filed a formal complaint

on these matters. That complaint was identified as Agency Complaint

No. 2009-22391-FAA-05, and was later procedurally dismissed by the

Agency. Complainant appealed the dismissal to the Commission. In Appeal

No. 0120092391 (September 21, 2009), the appeal was dismissed because

it was untimely filed. Accordingly, we find that the Agency correctly

dismissed the claims leading up and including Complainant’s termination

as stating the same claims that have already been adjudicated in an

earlier complaint.

With regard to claims 4 and 5, and to the extent that claim 1 was not

raised in the previous complaint, the record shows that Complainant

first sought EEO counseling on these matters on September 3, 2010.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints

of discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the

date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a

personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date

of the action. We find that Complainant’s EEO counselor contact was

well beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation period, supporting the

Agency’s dismissal of these claims. Complainant argues that he contact

the EEOC’s Oklahoma Area Office in April 2009 to raise these claims.

While the record supports his assertion, it also shows that Complainant

was advised in writing at the time that he needed to contact an Agency

EEO counselor in order to invoke the 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 federal sector

complaint process. Although Complainant acknowledged receiving this

advice, he did not contact an EEO counselor until September 2010, well

over a year later. Thus, we find Complainant has presented no persuasive

arguments or evidence warranting an extension of the time limit for

initiating EEO Counselor contact.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File A Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 12, 2011

__________________

Date

2

0120112725

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120112725