Jeannette B. Campbell, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 22, 2004
01a45587 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 22, 2004)

01a45587

11-22-2004

Jeannette B. Campbell, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.


Jeannette B. Campbell v. United States Postal Service

01A45587

November 22, 2004

.

Jeannette B. Campbell,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southwest Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A45587

Agency No. 1G-772-0031-04

DISMISSAL

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim. In a complaint dated May 26, 2004, complainant

alleged that she was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race

(Caucasian), sex (female), religion (Christian), and reprisal for prior

EEO activity when on February 27, 2004, she was given a Pre-Disciplinary

Oral Discussion for filing an injury claim.

This Commission has consistently held that official discussions alone do

not render an employee aggrieved. See Miranda v. United States Postal

Service, EEOC Request No. 05920308 (June 11, 1992); Devine v. United

States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05910269 (April 4, 1991).

Because complainant failed to show that she suffered harm or loss with

respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there

is a remedy, the Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a

claim under the EEOC regulations. See Diaz v. Department of the Air

Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). In the present case,

we find no claim by complainant that the discussion was recorded in any

personnel or supervisory files, nor that it can be used as a basis for

any subsequent disciplinary action. See Devine, supra.

Based on the foregoing, the agency's final decision dismissing

complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 22, 2004

__________________

Date