0120092529
09-17-2009
James Heald, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
James Heald,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120092529
Agency No. 4G752041808
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's
decision dated April 10, 2009, dismissing his complaint of unlawful
employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section
501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,
29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. Upon review, the
Commission finds that complainant's complaint was properly dismissed
pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), due to the untimely filing of
the formal complaint.
In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to
discrimination on the bases of race (not identified), disability (legs),
age (60), and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity under Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when, on April 25, 2008, he was sent
home and told there was no work for him. 1
The record discloses that complainant received the notice of right
to file a formal complaint on November 8, 2008. Although the notice
indicated that complainant had to file a formal complaint within fifteen
(15) calendar days of its receipt, the agency did not receive the formal
complaint until March 9, 2009, which is beyond the limitation period.
On appeal, complainant has not offered adequate justification to warrant
an extension of the time limit for filing the complaint. Complainant
asserts, and the record shows, that he in fact mailed his formal
complaint to the Commission instead of to the agency. The Commission
notes that complainant was given the proper information on where to
file his complaint. Complainant merely states that he "accidentally"
sent it to the Commission. The Commission has previously held that when
provided with the proper address, filing at the wrong address does not
constitute a proper filing. See Pacheco v. United States Postal Service,
EEOC Request No. 05930700 (September 10, 1993) (appeal untimely when
sent to wrong address despite receipt of proper instructions); Meggitt
v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01A40408 (February 3,
2004)(above principle applied to a formal complaint that was untimely
filed). Therefore, the Commission finds insufficient reason to extend
the time frames for filing his formal complaint.
Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's
complaint is affirmed.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M1208)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the
policies, practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,
Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request
to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail
within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the
defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that
the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also
permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other
security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within
the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with
the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.
Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time
limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
September 17, 2009
__________________
Date
1 In his appeal, complainant attached a copy of a grievance award which
found that the agency did not accommodate complaint with light duty
work.
??
??
??
??
2
0120092529
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
3
0120092529