James C. Latham, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 17, 2002
01A22552_r (E.E.O.C. Sep. 17, 2002)

01A22552_r

09-17-2002

James C. Latham, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


James C. Latham v. United States Postal Service

01A22552

September 17, 2002

.

James C. Latham,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A22552

Agency No. 4G-760-0048-02

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1), on the grounds

of failure to state a claim. In a formal EEO complaint dated November

7, 2001, complainant claimed that he was discriminated against on

the bases of his sex (male), age (49), disability (left foot injury),

and in reprisal for his previous EEO activity under Title VII, the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Rehabilitation Act when on

October 22, 2001, the Postmaster brought an agency official back to

the Amarillo, Texas facility with the blessing of the Manager, Post

Office Operations. Complainant stated that the agency official at issue

has a history of alleged sexual harassment and alleged death threats.

Complainant also claimed that the Manager, Post Office Operations

blessed and provoked incidents of harassment and retaliation when he

attended a town hall meeting and took the meeting away from his boss.

Subsequent to the filing of the instant complaint, complainant requested

EEO counseling with regard to an incident where the agency official who

had been brought back to the Amarillo facility interrupted complainant's

conversation with his supervisor, pointed at complainant, and exhibited

a hostile attitude toward complainant. The agency consolidated this

incident with the instant complaint in light of there being a sufficient

relationship between the claims.

We find that the instant complaint fails to state a claim. The

restoration of the agency official to the Amarillo facility did not cause

complainant to suffer personal harm or injury to a term, condition,

or privilege of his employment. The actions taken by the Manager,

Post Office Operations at a town hall meeting also did not adversely

affect complainant with regard to a term, condition, or privilege

of his employment. As for the incident that was raised subsequent

to the filing of the instant complaint, we find that this incident,

albeit an unpleasant encounter for complainant with the agency official,

did not cause complainant to suffer personal harm or injury to a term,

condition, or privilege of his employment. Accordingly, the agency's

decision dismissing complainant's complaint on the grounds of failure

to state a claim was proper and is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 17, 2002

__________________

Date