Jacqueline L. Haynes, Complainant,v.Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 4, 2010
0120093580 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 4, 2010)

0120093580

02-04-2010

Jacqueline L. Haynes, Complainant, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.


Jacqueline L. Haynes,

Complainant,

v.

Michael J. Astrue,

Commissioner,

Social Security Administration,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120093580

Agency No. ATL090502SSA

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated July 20, 2009, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

improperly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) for untimely

EEO Counselor contact.

In her complaint, complainant alleged that she was subjected to hostile

workplace discrimination on the bases of race (Black) and reprisal

for prior protected EEO activity under Title VII with respect to the

following: 1) Complainant heard her first line supervisor tell a fellow

co-worker, "If you get any Blacker, you'll have to sit at the back of

the bus." 2) When awards are issued, only White employees are given

quality step increases. 3) Senior Black employees are not allowed to

conduct training, while White employees with limited work experience

are allowed to conduct training. 4) Black employees receive a maximum

performance rating of three, while White employees receive a maximum

performance rating of five. 5) Although complainant has a bachelor's

degree, at the discretion of the selecting official she was hired as a

GS-04, despite the fact that the job announcement stated any selectee

with a bachelor's degree automatically qualified for a GS-5.

In its final decision, the agency stated that all of complainant's

claims, detailed above, preceded her subsequent termination on

August 12, 2008, but complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO

Counselor until May 1, 2009, which is well beyond the forty-five (45)

day limitation period.1 The agency also stated that in complainant's

prior discrimination complaint, Formal Complaint ATL-09-0854, complainant

challenged her termination and included the same background and/or

generalized information regarding workplace matters as alleged claims

in the current complaint, ATL-09-0502. The agency further stated that

it sent an acceptance letter, dated February 4, 2009, clearly providing

complainant an opportunity to clarify her previous claims. However,

the agency noted that complainant failed to respond.

On appeal, complainant claims that the agency had sought clarification

in her earlier claim involving her termination, but that various, agency

EEO offices were uncertain as to whether her additional claims would be

investigated as background for the termination claim or as a separate

complaint. Complainant maintains that the agency failed to notify her

of how it would proceed, that is, how it would investigate/resolve all

of her claims outlined in both formal complaints.

.

Because the agency acknowledges and the record reflects that the issues

in this subject appeal were presented during pre-complaint processing

of complainant's initial complaint, ATL-09-0854, we find that that it

is appropriate for the agency to investigate these unresolved claims.

Further, it is evident from the record presented on appeal, that the

agency mishandled the processing of these claims. Therefore, the agency's

dismissal of complainant's complaint for untimely EEO Counselor contact

was improper.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is reversed. The complaint is hereby remanded to the agency for

further processing in accordance with this decision and the Order below.

ORDER (E0408)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108.2 The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1208)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington,

DC 20013. The agency's report must contain supporting documentation,

and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the complainant.

If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil

Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party. Failure to file within the time

period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration

as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely

filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted

with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider

requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very

limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

February 4, 2010

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__________________

Date

1 The record discloses that complainant was terminated for falsely

presenting herself as a representative of the Macon ODAR Social Security

Administration entitled to receive medical records in connection with

a disability case.

2 If possible, the agency is advised to process these remanded claims

with complainant's initial complaint, ATL-09-0854.

??

??

??

??

2

0120093580

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

4

0120093580