01983572
04-07-1999
Jacqueline E. Chaney, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Jacqueline E. Chaney v. United States Postal Service
01983572
April 7, 1999
Jacqueline E. Chaney, )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01983572
) Agency No. 1-H-372-0008-98
)
William J. Henderson, )
Postmaster General, )
United States Postal Service, )
Agency. )
)
DECISION
The Commission finds that the agency's March 5, 1998 decision dismissing
appellant's complaint on the grounds of failure to state a claim, is
improper pursuant to the provisions of 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a).
The record shows that on November 4, 1997, the agency issued a Notice
of Removal charging appellant, a transitional employee (TE), with
unsatisfactory conduct. By letter dated November 24, 1997, the agency
rescinded the notice of removal. In a second letter also dated November
24, 1997, the agency informed appellant that she would be separated
from the agency effective November 29, 1997, "due to automation and
contractual obligations".
On December 3, 1997, appellant sought EEO counseling alleging that she
had been discriminated against on the bases of sex (female) and reprisal
for prior EEO activity when on December 3, 1997, she was informed
that she would not be considered to be rehired as a casual employee.
Appellant subsequently filed her formal complaint of discrimination.
The agency issued a final decision dismissing the complaint on the
grounds of failure to state a claim. The agency found that appellant
had failed to show that she had suffered a harm or had been treated
differently because all transitional employees had been removed.
On appeal, appellant contends that although another employee had been
involved in the incident that caused the removal, only she, appellant,
was removed. Appellant further claims that other TE's, of different sex
and different races, were converted into Casual Employees but that she,
who had worked with the agency for eight years, was not considered to
be rehired as a casual employee.
An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee or
applicant who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by
that agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or
disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �1614.103; �1614.106(a). The Commission
has held that while the regulations do not define the term "aggrieved
employee," the United States Supreme Court has interpreted it to mean
an employee who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term,
condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. Diaz
v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (Apr. 21, 1994).
"To state a claim under our regulations, an employee must allege and show
an injury in fact." Id. (citing Hackett v. McGuire Bros., 445 F.2d 447
(3d Cir. 1971)). "Specifically, an employee must allege and show a
`direct, personal deprivation at the hands of the employer,' that is,
a present and unresolved harm or loss affecting a term, condition or
privilege of his/her employment." Id. (citing Hammonds v. United States
Postal Serv., EEOC Request No. 05900863 (Oct. 31, 1990); Taylor v. United
States Postal Serv., EEOC Request No. 05900367 (June 2, 1990)).
In the instant complaint, a review of the record persuades the Commission
that the agency should have investigated this complaint and not dismissed
it for failure to state a claim: the only questions for the agency to
consider are whether appellant claims that she is aggrieved and whether
the complaint alleges employment discrimination on a basis covered by
EEO statutes. If the answer is yes, then the agency must accept the
complaint for processing, regardless of what it thought of the merits.
Odoski v. U.S. Department of Energy, EEOC Appeal No. 01901496 (April
16, 1990).
In her complaint appellant claims that she, a female transitional
employee with prior EEO activity, was informed that she would not be
considered to be rehired as a casual employee. She further claims that
other transitional employees, of different races and different sex,
were converted to casual employees. We find that this is sufficient to
state a claim under EEOC Regulations. The dismissal of the complaint
was inappropriate and is hereby REVERSED. The complaint is REMANDED
for further processing in accordance with this decision and applicable
regulations.
ORDER (E1092)
The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded allegations in accordance
with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant
that it has received the remanded allegations within thirty (30) calendar
days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to
appellant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant
of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days
of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise
resolved prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision
without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty
(60) days of receipt of appellant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy
of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights
must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The
report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to
the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's
order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of
the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right
to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's
order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.
See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,
the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying
complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File
A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for
enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to
the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the
appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the
complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.
See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �l6l4.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you
have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you
receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some
jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner
suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your
civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN
THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision
or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the
jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,
you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR
DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your
appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME
AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY
HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME
AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.
Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of
your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
April 7, 1999
DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director
Office of Federal Operations