Jacob Friedmansky, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 8, 1999
01992869 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 8, 1999)

01992869

11-08-1999

Jacob Friedmansky, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Jacob Friedmansky v. United States Postal Service

01992869

November 8, 1999

Jacob Friedmansky, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01992869

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, ) Agency No. 1D276000299

Agency. )

______________________________)

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that partial dismissal of the

appellant's complaint was proper pursuant to EEOC Regulation 29

C.F.R. �1614.107(a). Appellant's formal complaint alleges discrimination

on the basis of race (White), age (58), and physical disability (Back

sprain; physical condition) when: (1) on July 10, 1998 his supervisor

asked him if he had clocked out, but did not ask any of the other seven

Black employees; (2) on September 17, 1998, his supervisor failed to

give him a pay stub, while other employees were given pay stubs; and (3)

on September 18, 1998, appellant requested leave pursuant to the Family

and Medical Leave Act, but his leave request was processed as emergency

annual leave.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a) provides that an agency may

dismiss a complaint or a portion of a complaint which fails to state a

claim pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.103 or �1614.106(a). An agency shall

accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee who believes that he

or she has been discriminated against by that agency because of race,

color, religion, sex, national origin, age or a disabling condition. See

29 C.F.R. �1614.103; �1614.106(a). The Commission's Federal sector case

precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a

present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of

employment for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air

Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

In the instant case, the record reveals that the appellant was eventually

provided his pay stub on the same day all of the other employees were

provided their stubs. However, unlike the other employees, appellant

requested his pay stub before it was delivered to him.

The record also indicates that while appellant's leave request was

initially processed as emergency annual leave, his leave request was

corrected and processed under the Family and Medical Leave Act.

On appeal, no persuasive arguments or evidence have been presented to

show that appellant was injured by the incidents raised. Accordingly,

the agency's final decision dismissing appellant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT

IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

11/08/1999 ____________________________

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations