J. M. Portela & Co., Inc.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Mar 27, 1945

61 N.L.R.B. 64 (N.L.R.B. 1945)

In the Matter of J. M. PORTELA & COMPANY, INC. and UNION DE
TRABAJADORES DE LA INDUSTRIA LICORERA DE ARECIBO, F. L. T.
Case No. 24-R-27.-Decided March 27, 1945
Messrs. Juan Piza and Juan M. Rosso, of Arecibo, Puerto Rico, for
the Company.
Messrs. Rafael Aponte and Angel M. Collazo, of Arecibo, Puerto
Rico, for the Federation.
Mr. Juan Vazquez, of Arecibo, Puerto Rico, for the C. G. T.
Miss Ruth E. Blie field, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon a petition duly filed by Union de Trabajadores de la Indus-
tria Licorera de Arecibo, affiliated with the Federation Libre de los
Trabajadores de Puerto Rico, herein called the Federation, alleging
that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the repre-
sentation of employees of J. M. Portela & Company, Inc., Arecibo,
Puerto Rico, herein called the Company, the National Labor Rela-
tions Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice
before Gilberto Ramirez, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at
Arecibo, Puerto Rico, on October 19, 1944. The Company, the Fed-
eration, and Union de Trabajadores de la Industria Licorera, Local
de Arecibo, affiliated with the Confederation General de Trabajadores
de Puerto Rico, herein called the C. G. T., appeared and participated.'
All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine
and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on
the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are
free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were
afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board.
'The Federation objected to the C. G. T .'s motion to intervene on the ground that the
employees of the Company were dissatisfied with the C. G. T. and had designated the
Federation as their bargaining representative . The Trial Examiner overruled the objection,
and his ruling is hereby upheld.
61 N. L. R. B., No. 6.
64
J. M. PORTELA & COMPANY, INC. 65
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THE BUSINESS OF TILE COMPANY
J. M. Portela & Company, Inc., a Puerto Rican corporation, doing
business in Arecibo, Puerto Rico, is engaged in ageing, blending,
bottling, and selling rum. During 1943 the Company purchased
raw materials valued at approximately $142,000, which amount in-
cluded approximately $50,000 which was spent in the continental
United States. In excess of 70 percent of the production for 1943
was sold in the mainland, and during the first 9 months of 1944 over
50 percent of the Company's production was sold in the mainland
of the United States. It is estimated that purchases of raw materials
from the mainland will be in excess of $50,000 during the calendar
year 1944.
The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the
meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
Union de Trabajadores de la Industria Licorera de Arecibo, affili-
ated with the Federation Libre de los Trabajadores de Puerto Rico, 2
is a labor organization admitting to membership employees of the
Company.
Union de Trabajadores de la Industria Licorera, Local-de Arecibo,
affiliated with the Confederation General de Trabajadores de Puerto
Rico is a labor organization admitting to membership employees of
the Company.
III. THE QUESTION OONCERNING REPRESENTATION
The Federation on July 25, 1944, filed a petition for investigation
and certification of representatives. On October 17, 1944, the Com-
pany and the C. G. T. signed a contract recognizing the C. G. T. as the
collective bargaining representative of the Company's employees.
The C. G. T. moved to dismiss the present petition on the ground that
this contract constitutes a bar to a present determination of a col-
lective bargaining representative. The Company will not, appar-
ently, recognize the Federation without a certification by the Board.
In November 1943 a consent election was held among the employees
of the Company, as a result of which the C. G. T. was informed by the
Regional Director on November 12, 1943, that it had received a
2 The Federacion Libre de los Trabajadores de Puerto Rico is a branch of the American
Nederation of Labor.
66 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
majority of the votes cast in the election and had therefore been desig-
nated as the exclusive bargaining representative of the employees of
the Company. The C. G. T. was opposed in the election by the Fed-
eration, the petitioner in this case.
Negotiations between the Company and the C. G. T. started early
in January 1944. An agreement was reached on all points in a pro-
posed contract, with the exception of the wage scale, during the first
day of negotiation. No further action was taken by the C. G. T. until
April 25, 1944, when it sent a letter to the Company stating that it
was sending a copy of the contract with the salary scale approved
by the employees in the plant and that a representative of the C. G.T.
would come to the Company's offices on April 27, 1944, to sign the
contract. On April 29,'1944, the. president of the C. G. T. appeared,
and at that time the Company stated that the contract presented
differed from the contract they had discussed in January. The Com-
pany asked permission to prepare the contract as it was discussed
in January 1944 for submission to the workers. Leave was granted,
and about 4 or 5 days later the Company gave one of the employees
in the plant a copy of the contract it had prepared, for submission
to the C. G. T. - On May 14, 1944 a representative of the C. G. T. in-
formed the Company that the employees were dissatisfied with the
wage scales in the contract.
On July 25, 1944, the Federation filed its petition for certification
of representatives. Subsequent to this date, on August 16, 1944, the
C. G. T. informed the Company by letter, that the Secretary General
of the C. G. T. would appear on August 18, 1944, to sign the contract.
No one appeared on that date, and it was testified that the representa-
tives did not call upon the Company because there was as yet no agree-
ment as to the wage scale. On October 1, 1944, representatives of the
C. G. T. and the Company finally reached an agreement, which was
embodied in the contract signed by the Company and the C. G. T. on
October 17, 1944. The latter date is subsequent to the date of the
Notice of Hearing in ,this case, which was received by the Company
and the C. G. T. on October 14, 1944.
The C. G. T. urges that the contract of October 17, 1944, be deemed
a bar to a determination of representatives at this time. That con-
tract, however, was not signed until after the contracting parties were
advised, by the Notice of Hearing, of the Federation's claim to repre-
sent the Company's employees.3 It is true that at the time the petition
herein was filed, in July 1944, only 8 months had elapsed since the
consent election which resulted in the informal certification of the
C. G. T. as the statutory representative of the employees involved. In
view of the recency of the consent election, it would have been better
8 See Matter of Eicor, Inc., 46 N. L. R. B. 1035.
J. M. PORTELA & COMPANY, INC. 67
practice if the petition had been promptly dismissed as premature ;
and if the circumstances were different, we would be inclined to hold
that the petition, per se, was inoperative to prevent the subsequent
contract from effectively barring a present determination of repre-
sentatives.' Nevertheless, the petition remained pending, and the
Notice of Hearing, received by the Company and the C. G. T. on
October 14, slightly more than 11 months after the date of the certifi-
cation, served as actual notice to those parties that a question concern-
ing representation existed. This date, clearly, was an appropriate
time to proceed with an investigation to determine whether or not the
employees desired to select a new bargaining representative to succeed
the C. G. T 6 Accordingly, since the contracting parties were advised
of the existence of a valid question of representation at an appropriate
time following the certification of the C. G. T., and several days prior
to October 17, when they signed that contract, the contract presents no
bar to a determination of represenatives in this proceeding.'
A statement of a Board agent introduced into evidence at the hear-
ing, indicates that the Federation represents a substantial number of
employees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate."
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The parties agreed, and we find in accordance with their agree-
ment, that all production and maintenance employees, excluding the
two road salesmen, the chauffeur for one of the salesmen, the office
employees, the supervisors, and all or any other supervisory employees
with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise
effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend
such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collec-
tive bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act.
V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
We shall direct that the question concerning representation which
has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em-
4 See Matter of Monarch Aluminum Mfg. Co , 41 N L R B 1 , Matter of Bohn Alwmr
num and Brass Corporation, 57 N L R. B. 1684 ; N. L R. B Ninth Annual Report, p 25
Cf. Matter of Portland Lumber Mills, 56 N. L R B 1336.
8 See Matter of New York and Cuba Mail Steamship Co., 9 N L. R B. 51 ; Matter of
Waterman Steamship Corporation, 10 N L. R B 1079.
7 Matter of General Chemical Company, 48 N. L. R B 988
8 The Field Examiner reported that the Federation submitted 19 authorization cards,
all of which bear the names of persons appearing on the Company's pay roll of August
3, 1944, which contained the names of 50 employees in the appropriate unit, and all the
cards were dated July 1944
68 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-
roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election
herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the
Direction.°
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations
Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Rela-
tions Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa-
tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with J. M. Portela
& Company, Inc., Arecibo, Puerto Rico, an election by secret ballot
shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than sixty (60)'
days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and super-
vision of the Regional Director for the Twenty-fourth Region, acting
in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and
subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regula-
tions among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section
IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately
preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not
work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation
or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces
of the United States, who present themselves in person at the polls,
but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged
for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date
of the election, to determine whether they desire to be represented
by Industria Licorera de Arecibo, affiliated with La Nacion Libre de
losTrabajadores de Puerto Rico, or by Union de la Industria Licorera
de Arecibo, affiliated with the Confederation de Trabaj adores de
Puerto Rico, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither.
° At the hearing the Unions requested that their naives appear on the ballot as herein-
after set forth in the Direction of Election The requests of the Unions that their insignia
bp shown on the ballots are hereby granted.