J. C. Penney Co., Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsMar 11, 1975216 N.L.R.B. 965 (N.L.R.B. 1975) Copy Citation J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC. 965 J. C. Penney Company , Inc., Store No. 1957, Edina, Minnesota and Retail Clerks Union, Local 1086, affiliated with Retail Clerks International Associa- tion, AFL-CIO, Petitioner. Case 18-RC-10146 March 11, 1975 DECISION ON REVIEW AND ORDER BY MEMBERS JENKINS, KENNEDY, AND PENELLO On August 9, 1974, the Acting Regional Director for Region 18 issued a Decision and Direction of Election in the above-entitled proceeding in which he found to be appropriate as a warehouse unit, in accord with the Petitioner's request, the employees employed at the Employer's facility located at 5751 Washington Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota, re- ferred to as the receiving and marking room (hereinafter R & M). Thereafter the Employer filed a timely request for review of the Acting Regional Director's decision on the grounds that in concluding that the requested unit is an appropriate warehouse unit he departed from officially reported precedent and made findings of fact which are clearly errone- ous. By telegraphic order dated September 5, 1974, the request for review was granted and the election stayed pending decision on review. Thereafter the Employer filed a brief on review. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board has delegated its authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel. The Board has considered the entire record in this case with respect to the issues under review, including the Employer's brief on review, and makes the following findings: As indicated, the Petitioner seeks as a warehouse unit all employees employed at the Employer's R&M facility. The Employer contends the Acting Regional Director erred in concluding that the requested unit is appropriate. We agree. The Employer's operations comprise a department store and automotive service center in the Southdale Shopping Center in Edina, including the R&M facility here involved, which is located 5 miles from the shopping center. Most of the warehousing of merchandise for all area (Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota) retail operations is centralized at another location. The subject R&M facility serves only the Employer's retail store and automotive service center. Of the Employer's total complement of about 550 employees, 33 are employed at the R&M facility, comprising 20 stock clerks, 2 head stock clerks, 8 216 NLRB No. 175 stock handlers , 1 furniture refinisher , 1 receiver, and 1 deliveryman . The facility has 65 ,000 square feet of space , consisting primarily of two docks and areas for unpacking, inspection , and marking of merchan- dise . There are also smaller areas devoted to the holding of charged-back merchandise to be returned to vendors , and storage areas for seasonal merchan- dise , display fixtures , and merchandise to be offered during promotional sales . Some furniture is also stored at the facility and, in emergencies , carpeting has been stored there. Of all merchandise sold by the Employer, 95 percent is received, processed , and marked at the R&M facility and then moved to the store and automotive center . A shuttle truck makes six round trips daily. The Employer's standard , usually ad- hered to , is to move the merchandise to the store or automotive center within 48 hours of receipt. At the store and automotive center there are perimeter stockrooms where merchandise may be stored until needed in the selling areas . There are 15 stock clerks and 1 stock handler at the store , and 3 stock clerks at the center . Some items of merchandise , such as fine jewelry, catalog sales items , floor samples, and restaurant supplies , are received directly at the store. The Employer keeps as much of the hard-line merchandise , such as lawnmowers and bicycles, as possible at the store . Tires and batteries are received directly at the automotive center . Major appliances sold at the store are delivered to the customers directly from the warehouse which serves all J. C. Penney stores in the area. Stock clerks at the R&M facility receive and check in merchandise and perform the necessary paper- work involved in checking in merchandise. They unpack and ticket merchandise and put the merchan- dise on carts for transportation to the retail store. They prepare defective merchandise for return to vendors . The two head stock clerks at the R&M facility lead and direct the work of other stock clerks, answer their questions, and perform the same type of work as other stock clerks . Stock clerks at the retail store receive merchandise from either the R&M facility or other sources and move it to the appropri- ate department . Occasionally stock clerks at the retail store reticket merchandise , when necessary to reflect price changes . In addition , selling employees spend 20 to 25 percent of their time in moving merchandise to and from the perimeter storage areas and the sales floor and in remarking merchandise. Stock clerks at the automotive service center receive, check , mark , and store batteries and tires which, as noted above , are delivered directly to that facility. They also receive any merchandise received from the R&M facility and move it to the basement storage area. 966 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Stock handlers unload trucks bringing merchandise to the R&M facility, unpack merchandise, and assemble furniture for delivery and are responsible for the movement of merchandise through that facility and for loading it on the shuttle vehicle for transport to the store and center . They also check in, inspect, mark, and ticket hard-line merchandise. Stock handlers at the main store receive , check in, and unpack catalog merchandise and take it to its proper location. The receiver at the R&M facility performs functions similar to both stock clerks and stock handlers. The furniture refinisher touches up furniture by repairing scratches and blemishes and also helps prepare furniture for shipment to custom- ers. Only the refinisher and deliveryman have no counterparts at the retail store and automotive service center. With respect to the supervision of employees, although Stockroom Manager Carlton Nelson super- vises employees at the R&M facility, he reports to, and receives direction from, Operations Manager Donald R. Olson. Olson is responsible for the stockroom activities at the retail store and the automotive service center as well as the R&M facility, and he spends 3 or 4 hours per week, or about 10 percent of his time , at the R&M facility. Nelson has no authority to hire or fire employees, although he can send employees home for major disciplinary infractions, such as drunkenness. The personnel manager, Brian P. Frank, sets the pay rate for each new employee. A personnel clerk at the retail store monitors the eligibility for pay increases. Frank, with the guidance of the store manager, determines the amount of any pay increases granted to an employee. Olson may, after a pay increase is decided upon, request that the increase be more or less than that determined by Frank. Nelson's role is limited to notifying an R&M employee of any pay increase. Olson personally appraises the performance of stockroom personnel at the R&M facility and at the store and he monitors the daily productivity of R&M personnel. Interviews with R&M employees concerning severe disciplinary matters are handled by Olson , sometimes with the assistance of Nelson. Coaching sessions , involving less serious matters, may be held by Nelson but only after this prior consultation with Olson. The buying of merchandise is based on a perpetual inventory record kept by counters, sales personnel, and merchandise records personnel in the store. Merchandise records clerks prepare orders and send copies to the Employer's supplier, to its New York buying office, to the R&M facility, and to the invoice office. Employees at the R&M facility and at the store and automotive service center have regular contacts each day in checking the correctness of merchandise received, quantity of merchandise, selling prices, appropriateness of substitute merchan- dise, cancellation dates, availability of merchandise, and in arranging for delivery of merchandise to the customers. In the less than 3 years since the commencement of activities at the R&M facility there have been 9 permanent transfers of employees from the store to the R&M facility and 23 permanent transfers from the R&M facility to the store or center. Individuals who have permanently transferred from selling to nonselling positions in the R&M facility have come from both selling and nonselling positions in the store. Employees have transferred from the R&M facility to both selling and nonselling positions at the store or automotive service center. More than half of all the permanent transfers involved promotions. Temporary transfers, defined as more than 1 day but less than 2 weeks, have also occurred. During the same period there have been 37 temporary transfers of employees from the retail store to the R&M facility and 21 temporary transfers from the R&M facility to the retail store or automotive service center. As in the case of permanent transfers, employees were temporarily transferred from the R&M facility to both selling and nonselling positions at the store and auto service center and from selling and nonselling positions at these facilities to the nonselling positions at the R&M facility. Moreover, the Employer's records as to temporary transfers reflect only the total number of employees involved, not the total number of incidents of transfer. During periods of peak delivery of merchandise, usually August and October, the Employer hires additional stock employees at all three facilities. Some of those employees who commenced working at the R&M facility were subsequently transferred to selling positions in the store when the need to use them in the R&M facility declined. All stock employees have the same dress code which is less casual than that established for the selling employees who deal with the public. Stock employees at all three facilities have the same base rate of pay as sales personnel. Employees at all three facilities attend monthly meetings at the retail store concerning their enrollment in the Employer's benefit program. In addition inventory meetings and quarterly pension and profit-sharing meetings, which all employees attend, are held at the main store. The payroll department at the main store computes the pay - for all employees and all employees are paid each Friday. All employees at all three facilities are hired through the retail store and all personnel records are kept there. The personnel department conducts an orientation program at the retail store for each new employee. J. C. PENNEY In the instant case , it is clear that the requested employees at the R&M facility are engaged, as the name of that facility implies , primarily in receiving and marking functions and not the warehousing function , which is for the most part , performed at another location . Thus, as the facts herein demon- strate , there is a close integration of the receiving and marking functions performed at the R&M facility with operations carried on at the store and automo- tive center , so that the R&M facility is in reality a part of this particular retail facility for which it alone performs functions . For this reason , therefore, we find the requested R&M employees do not have a sufficiently distinct community of interest apart from COMPANY, INC. 967 other employees at the store and center to warrant finding them to be an appropriate unit. Accordingly, we find the requested unit to be inappropriate and as the Petitioner has made no alternative request for a broader appropriate unit, we find that no question affecting commerce exists concerning representation of certain employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9(c)(1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act. We shall therefore dismiss the petition herein. ORDER It is hereby ordered that the petition filed herein be, and it hereby is, dismissed. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation