Ivan K. Hughes, Complainant,v.Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 30, 2002
01A22283_r (E.E.O.C. Jul. 30, 2002)

01A22283_r

07-30-2002

Ivan K. Hughes, Complainant, v. Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Ivan K. Hughes v. Department of the Army

01A22283

July 30, 2002

.

Ivan K. Hughes,

Complainant,

v.

Thomas E. White,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A22283

Agency No. BWHJFO0111B0180

DECISION

Complainant filed the instant appeal from an agency final decision dated

January 17, 2001, dismissing his complaint of unlawful discrimination in

violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation

Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. and Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. In

his complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination

on the bases of sex and disability when<1>:

Complainant was asked to perform tasks outside his medical restrictions;

Complainant was issued a Notice of Proposed Removal, dated October

10, 2001.

Complainant was harassed by his supervisor which harassment included

calling complainant "guy", "bubba" and "man" even after complainant had

asked that he be called by his name and scrutinizing complainant's attire

and gum/candy chewing.

The agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1)

finding that none of complainant's claims state a claim upon which

relief may be granted. The agency noted that complainant's impairment

(feet-activated arthrosis) does not render complainant a qualified

individual with a disability. Further, the agency found that since the

proposed removal was cancelled, complainant's claim 2 must be dismissed

as a preliminary action under 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(5). Lastly, the

alleged incidents of harassment (claim 3) described by complainant do not

rise to a level sufficiently severe or pervasive to state a justiciable

claim of harassment under Title VII.

After a review of the agency's final decision, the Commission finds

that the agency has addressed the merits of claim 1 without a proper

investigation as required by the regulations. We find that the agency's

articulated reason for the action in dispute, i.e., that complainant

is not a qualified individual with a disability, goes to the merits of

complainant's complaint, and is irrelevant to the procedural issue of

whether he has stated a justiciable claim. See Osborne v. Department of

the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05960111 (July 19, 1996); Lee v. United

States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05930220 (August 12, 1993);

Ferrazzoli v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05910642

(August 15, 1991). Therefore the agency improperly dismissed claim 1

for failure to state a claim pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1).

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(5) provides, in part,

that the agency shall dismiss a complaint that alleges that a proposal to

take a personnel action, or other preliminary step to taking a personnel

action, is discriminatory. We concur with the agency's finding that claim

2 is not an adverse employment action because it only proposes to take

an action that, in fact, did not occur. Claim 2 was properly dismissed.

Similarly, we concur with the agency's finding that the harassment

described in claim 3 is neither sufficiently severe or pervasive to

render complainant aggrieved. Claim 3 was properly dismissed pursuant to

29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). Furthermore, claims 2 and 3, when considered

together, are insufficient to state a claim of harassment.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing claim 1 is REVERSED.

Claim 1 is hereby REMANDED to the agency for further processing in

accordance with this decision and the Order below. We AFFIRM the

agency's dismissal of claims 2 and 3, for the reasons set forth herein.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 30, 2002

__________________

Date

1We have numbered the claims of complainant's

complaint for reference.