International Harvester Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsOct 26, 1955114 N.L.R.B. 709 (N.L.R.B. 1955) Copy Citation INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER-, COMPANY 709 International , - Harvester . Company, Louisville Works and Mill- wrights, Conveyors and, Machinery , Erectors Local Union s • #2209, Falls Cities Carpenters District Council , United Broth- erhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL, Petitioner. Case No. 9-RC-2535. October 26,1955 - -DECISION- AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9 (c) of the National La- bor Relations Act, a hearing was held before William G. Wilkerson, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby 'affirmed. Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds : 1. The Employer is engaged in 'commerce within the meaning of the Act. - 2. The labor organizations involved claim to represent certain em- ployees of the Employer.' 3. A question affecting commerce exists concerning the representa- tion of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 4. The Employer's Louisville Works consists of two operations, a machine shop and a foundry, which have separate histories of collec- tive bargaining. We are solely concerned here with certain employees in the foundry. In 1949 the Board established an overall production and maintenance unit of foundry employees,' and in 1950 the Board established two separate craft units of maintenance electricians and pipefitters in the foundry.' In 1949, there was also established by con- sent,election agreement a separate craft unit of patternmakers 4 In 1951, the Board directed another election in the residual production and 'maintenance unit, and "globed" two more separate craft units of millwrights and repairmen in one unit and maintenance welders in another unit.5 As a result of those elections, the Intervenor herein was certified as, and still is, the bargaining representative of the residual production and maintenance unit, including the maintenance welders'; and the Petitioner herein was certified as, and still is, the bargaining representative of the unit of millwrights and repairmen. The Peti- I International Union, United Automobile ; Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 817, UAW-CIO, herein called the Intervenor, intervened on the basis of its contract with the Employer covering the'employees involved herein 2 85'NLRB 1310. A 88 NLRB 214. 4 Case No 9-RC-430 (not reported in printed volumes of Board Decisions.and Orders). 695 NLRB 730. Under then existing Board policy on craft severance, the -Board con- sidered maintenance weldeis as a severable craft group. - 114 NLRB No. 109. 710 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD tioner now seeks to add the maintenance welders to the unit of mill- wrights and repairmen which it represents. The Intervenor contends that a unit of maintenance welders is inappropriate for severance from the residual production and maintenance unit. The Employer takes no position. The maintenance welders spend 85 to 90 percent of their time working with the millwrights and repairmen, doing the welding and cutting that is required in connection with the dismantling, moving, installing, and repair of production equipment which is performed by the millwrights and repairmen. The remainder of their time is spent either working by themselves on the burning of scrap metal or miscel- laneous tasks, or doing such welding work which might be required in connection with, the work performed by the pipefitters and elec- tricians. The maintenance welders do both are and gas welding. Along with the knowledge of the mechanics of welding, such as clamping, proper fluxes, expansion and contraction of different types of metal, the job requirements set up by the Employer also call for a thorough knowledge of the equipment on which the welding work is being performed, including both construction and repair of such equip- ment. While the Employer has no apprenticeship or on-the-job training program for the maintenance welders, all of them had pre- vious experience as welders," and the Employer estimated that it would take the average person without previous experience at least 14 to 16 months on the job to acquire the knowledge and skill expected of a maintenance welder.' Moreover, the rate of pay of the maintenance welders is that of craftsmen, with the maintenance welders being classified in the same grade as maintenance electricians and pipefitters, and in a higher grade than the millwrights. Maintenance welders are also given a welding test before they are hired which requires previous experience or training to pass. There are also welders in the production department of the foundry who are primarily engaged in the welding of castings in connection with salvage. However, there is no interchange between the produc- tion welders and the maintenance welders, and the maintenance weld- ers do no production welding at all. Moreover, the Employer testi- fied that the amount of skill required of the production welders is not comparable to that required of the maintenance welders, and that the production Welders are paid at a lower labor grade. In the recent Clayton & Lambert case," the Board found that weld- 8 The record also shows more specifically that 1 maintenance welder had 7 years of previous experience when hired, and that another had 2 to 3,years ' previous experience. 7 The Employer also testified that the maintenance welders required a "considerable" amount of skill 8 Clayton & Lambert Manufacturing Company, Ordnance Division, 111 NLRB 540. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY 711 ing -as such is not a separate and distinct craft within the meaning of the definition set forth in American Potash,' and consequently held that it would no longer permit welders as a group to be severed from an established production and maintenance unit. However, the Board also stated in Clayton d Lambert that it would, in future craft sever- ance cases, include welders who are regularly assigned to work with particular crafts in a unit of the particular craft to which the welders are assigned, if on the basis of training or experience the welders utilize a high degree of skill. This latter rule is applicable here. The Board has already held that the millwrights and repairmen here consti- tute a craft group.1° We consider the 85 to 90 percent of their time during which the maintenance welders are assigned to work with the millwrights and repairmen as being sufficient to meet the "regularly assigned" test of Clayton & Lambert. We are also satisfied that on the basis of training or experience the maintenance welders utilize a high degree of skill within the meaning of the Clayton & Lambert rule. Moreover, in a situation quite similar to the one here, the Board held that millwright helpers could be added to an existing craft unit of millwrights if the helpers so desired." We find therefore that the maintenance welders may, if they so desire, appropriately be included in the existing craft unit of millwrights and repairmen. Accordingly, we shall direct an election in the following voting group : All main- tenance welders in the foundry, department 85, at the Employer's Louisville Works, Louisville, Kentucky, excluding all other employees, and supervisors as defined in the Act.12 If a majority in this voting group vote for` the Petitioner, they will be, taken to have indicated a desire that the group be included in the existing unit of millwrights and repairmen, and the Regional Director is instructed to issue a certification of representatives to that effect. If, however, a majority votes for the Intervenor, they will be taken to have indicated a desire that the group remain in the existing residual production and main- tenance unit, and the Regional Director will issue a certification of re- sults of election to that effect. [Text of Direction of Election omitted from publication.] 9 American Potash t Chemical Corporation , 107 NLRB 1418. 10 95 NLRB 730 St Regis Paper Company, 105 NLRB 371. One employee , Demaree , who is ordinarily a full-time blacksmith , last year was assigned to the maintenance welder group due to a decrease in blacksmith work. Recently, however, due to an increase in blacksmith work , he was transferred back to blacksmith work; and he now spends about 50 percent of his time doing blacksmith work, about 225 percent of his time doing maintenance welding , and the remaining 25 percent of his time in other duties. As Demaree currently is not regularly assigned as a maintenance welder to the millwrights and repairmen , we exclude him from the voting group. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation