INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATIONDownload PDFPatent Trials and Appeals BoardOct 19, 20212021001554 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 19, 2021) Copy Citation UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 15/680,582 08/18/2017 Raphael Ezry END920170078US1 1448 133758 7590 10/19/2021 Roberts Calderon Safran & Cole, P.C. Intellectual Property Department P.O. Box 10064 McLean, VA 22102-8064 EXAMINER TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 3628 NOTIFICATION DATE DELIVERY MODE 10/19/2021 ELECTRONIC Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the following e-mail address(es): Docketing@rcsc-ip.com lgallaugher@rcsc-ip.com PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ____________ Ex parte RAPHAEL EZRY and MUNISH GOYAL ____________ Appeal 2021-001554 Application 15/680,582 Technology Center 3600 ____________ Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, ANTON W. FETTING, and TARA L. HUTCHINGS, Administrative Patent Judges. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appeal 2021-001554 Application 15/680,582 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE1 Raphael Ezry and Munish Goyal (Appellant2) seeks review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of a final rejection of claims 1–4, 6–8, 10, 11, and 13–20, the only claims pending in the application on appeal. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). The Appellant invented a way of predicting un-capacitated freight demand3 on a multi-hop shipping route. Specification para. 1. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below (bracketed matter and some paragraphing added). 1. A computer-implemented method, comprising: [1] receiving, by a computing device, daily real-time customer booking data for multiple dispersed ports along a shipping route of a shipping vessel from remote servers in a network; [2] determining, 1 Our decision will make reference to the Appellant’s Appeal Brief (“Appeal Br.,” filed September 8, 2020) and Reply Brief (“Reply Br.,” filed December 28, 2020), and the Examiner’s Answer (“Ans.,” mailed October 27, 2020), and Final Action (“Final Act.,” mailed April 8, 2020). 2 We use the word “Appellant” to refer to “applicant” as defined in 37 C.F.R. § 1.42. Appellant identifies the real party in interest as International Business Machines Corporation (Appeal Br. 2). 3 Capacitated demand is defined as the portion of the given demand that can be served by a network without violating capacity constraints on any of the network’s facilities. Spec. para. 3. Un-capacitated demand is the demand when the shipping network capacity is infinite and, as such, is generally unobserved. Spec. para. 20. Appeal 2021-001554 Application 15/680,582 3 by the computing device, an estimated customer arrival pattern for each port on the shipping route based on the real-time customer booking data; [3] determining, by the computing device, an estimated blocking probability for each of the ports on the shipping route due to shipping capacity constraints, upstream bookings and downstream bookings utilizing an Erlang-B formula: 𝑃𝑃𝐵𝐵𝑖𝑖(𝑡𝑡) = max 𝜌𝜌𝑖𝑖 (1 − (1−ρ)ρ𝐶𝐶 1−ρ𝐶𝐶+1 ), wherein PBi(t) represents a blocking probability (PB) for a port (i) at a given time (t), a variable (ρ) represents demand divided by capacity (Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation