Interboro Chevrolet Co., Inc.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jul 12, 1955

113 N.L.R.B. 118 (N.L.R.B. 1955)

118 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
inclusion in a unit with nonprofessional employees. We shall there-
fore direct separate elections in the following voting groups in the unit :
(a) All employees except pharmacists.
(b) All pharmacists.
The employees in voting group (a) will be polledlo determine whether
or not they wish the Petitioner to represent them. The employees in
voting group (b) will be asked two questions on their ballot: (1) Do
you desire to be included, together with the nonprofessional employees
in voting group (a), in a unit of all employees employed in-the Em-
ployer's division 1 and 2 stores located in the greater Kansas City
metropolitan area for the purposes of collective bargaining? (2) Do
you desire to be represented for the purposes of collective bargaining
by the Petitioner? If a majority of the professional employees in vot-
ing group (b) vote "Yes" to the first question, they will be included
in such unit, which in that event we find to be appropriate. Their
-votes on the second question will then be counted together with the
votes of the nonprofessional voting group (a) to decide the question
of representation for the whole unit. If on the other hand a majority
of the professional employees in voting group (b) vote against in-
clusion, we find voting groups (a) and (b) each constitute a separate
appropriate unit. The votes of each voting group will then be sepa-
rately counted to decide whether or not that group desires to be repre-
sented by the Petitioner.
5. In the earlier case we found the record insufficient to enable us to
determine the voting eligibility of relief employees. The parties now
stipulate, and we find, that relief employees should be eligible to vote
if they have worked on 4 or more days during the month preceding the
notice of elections. In all other respects we adhere to the eligibility
standards of the earlier case.
[Text of Direction of Elections omitted from publication.]
Interboro Chevrolet Co., Inc. and John J . Robinson, Jr., Petitioner
and Local 596, Garage, Parking and Service Station Employees'
Union, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs,
Warehousemen & Helpers of America, AFL and Local 724,
District 1, International Association of Machinists, AFL.
Case No. 4-RD-140. July 1f2,1955
SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION AND CERTIFICATION OE
RESULTS OF ELECTION
Pursuant to a Decision and Direction of Election dated February 25,
1955,1 an election by secret ballot was conducted on March 14, 1955,
111 NLRB 783.
113 NLRB No. 16.
INTERBORO CHEVROLET CO., INC. 119
under the direction of the Regional Director for the Fourth Region,
among the employees of the Employer in the unit found appropriate
by the Board. Thereafter, a tally of ballots was furnished the parties,
showing that, of approximately 16 eligible voters, 14 voted against, and
1 voted for, the Unions.
On March 18, 1955, the Unions filed timely objections to the election.
After an investigation, the Regional Director issued a report and
recommendations on objections, in which he recommended that the ob-
jections be overruled. The Unions filed exceptions to the Regional
Director's report.
In their exceptions, as in their objections, the Unions allege in sub-
stance that the election was improperly arranged and conducted for
the reason that (a) no preelection conference was held, and (b) they
were denied the right to check the eligibility list and to name an ob-
server.
(a) The Regional Director recommended that the objection in this
connection be overruled, stating that the Board's Rules and Regula-
tions do not require the holding of preelection conferences and that
none of the parties indicated the need or desire for such a conference.
We agree with the Regional Director that the objection does not raise
any substantial or material issue with respect to the election. The
matter of holding preelection conferences is left to the Regional Di-
rector's discretion, which the Unions have not shown was abused to
their prejudice in the instant matter. This objection is therefore over-
ruled.
(b) In this connection the Regional Director found that the Unions
were directly apprised of the opportunity to check the eligibility list
and to name an observer for the election. The Unions, in their excep-
tions, dispute this finding. Even assuming, however, that the allega-
tions made by the Unions are true, we find the objections to be without
merit. By their own admission, the Unions were notified prior to
March 4 that the election would be held on March 14. The notice of
election in this case, a copy of which was served on the Unions' at-
torney,2 specified the time and place, as well as the date, of the election
and designated the eligibility payroll date in accordance with the direc-
tion contained in the Board's previous decision herein. The Unions do
not appear to have requested an opportunity either to check the per-
tinent payroll prior to the election or to have an observer present at the
election, nor was any such opportunity denied to them. There is no
contention that any ineligible employee was included on the eligibility
list or voted nor that the Board agent conducting the election im-
properly carried out his functions. Under all the circumstances, we
0It appears that the Regional Director's finding to this effect is not being contested by
the Unions in their exceptions.
379288-56-vol. 113-9
120 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
are of the opinion that the Unions' objections relating to their alleged
lack of opportunity to check the eligibility list 9 or have an observer at
the election 4 should be overruled as lacking in merit.
As we have overruled the Unions' objections, and as the Unions
failed to receive a majority of the valid ballots cast, we shall certify
the results of the election.
[The Board certified that a majority of the valid ballots was not cast
for Local 596, Garage, Parking and Service Station Employees' Union,
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen
& Helpers of America, AFL, and Local 724, District 1, International
Association of Machinists, AFL, and that the said organizations are
riot the exclusive representative of the Employer's employees in the
appropriate unit.]
MEMBER MURDOCK took no part in the consideration of the above
Supplemental Decision and Certification of Results of Election.
3 Cf Gerber Products Company, 95 NLRB 1300
4The presence of observers at an cloction other than Boaid agents, is not required by
the Act Sim plot Fertilizer Company, 107 NLRB 1211, 1221.
Youngstown Tent and Awning Company, and/or Youngstown
Tent and Awning Company , a Division of Wagner Awning and
Manufacturing Company and United Steelworkers of America,
CIO. Case No. 8-CA-1071. July l3,1955
DECISION AND ORDER
On May 6, 1955, Trial Examiner Alba B. Martin issued his Inter-
mediate Report in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Re-
spondent had engaged in and was engaging in certain unfair labor
practices and recommending that it cease and desist therefrom and
take certain affirmative action, as set forth in the copy of the Inter-
mediate Report attached hereto. Thereafter, the Respondent filed
exceptions to the Intermediate Report and a supporting brief.
The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner made
at the hearing and finds that no prejudicial error was committed. The
rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Inter-
mediate Report, the exceptions and brief, and the entire record in this
case, and hereby adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations
of the Trial Examiner.'
I We amend the Trial Examiner's conclusion of law number 3 to l ead as follows , United
Steelw oikem s of America, CIO, was on December 2, 1954, and has been at all tines niate-
rial thereafter, the exclusive baigaining representative of the employees in the aforesaid
appropuate unit in accordance with the provisions of Section 9 (a) of the Act
113 NLRB No. 20.