Imperial Hospital

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Aug 5, 1981

257 N.L.R.B. 581 (N.L.R.B. 1981)

IMPERIAL HOSPITAL
Imperial Hospital; Donald W. Henry, Trustee in
Bankruptcy and Hospital and Service Employ-
ees Union, Local 399, Service Employees Inter-
national Union, AFL-CIO. Case 31-CA-9901
August 5, 1981
DECISION AND ORDER
Upon a charge filed on March 24, 1980, by Hos-
pital and Service Employees Union, Local 399,
Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO
(hereinafter the Union), and duly served on Imperi-
al Hospital (hereinafter Respondent), the General
Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, by
the Regional Director for Region 31, issued a con-
solidated complaint' on July 29, 1980, against Re-
spondent, alleging that Respondent hadengaged in
and was engaging in unfair labor practices affecting
commerce within the meaning of Section 8(a)(5)
and (1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the National
Labor Relations Act, as amended. Copies of the
charge and the complaint and notice of hearing
before an administrative law judge were duly
served on the parties to this proceeding. Respond-
ent failed to file an answer.
On January 9, 1981, an amendment to the charge
was filed by the Union. On February 6, 1981, an
amended complaint was issued, naming Donald W.
Henry, Respondent's trustee in bankruptcy (herein-
after Respondent's Trustee), as a successor in bank-
ruptcy to Respondent. 2 Copies of the amended
charge and amended complaint were duly served
on Respondent and Respondent's Trustee. Re-
spondent failed to file an answer to the amended
complaint.
With respect to the unfair labor practices, the
amended complaint alleges in substance the follow-
ing: Respondent was at all times material herein
prior to December 15, 1979, a health care institu-
tion. Since on or about July 14, 1980, Respondent's
Trustee has been duly designated pursuant to an
order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of California as the trustee in
bankruptcy of Respondent. As such, Respondent's
Trustee was at all times material herein, and is, a
'The complaint consolidated Cases 31-CA-9901 and 31-CA-10086.
Subsequently, on February 6 1981. the Regional Director severed Case
31-CA-9901 from Case 31 CA100)86; additionally, the Regional Direc-
tor withdrew the complaint in Case 31-CA-10086 and dismissed the
charge therein Thus, the amended complaint discussed herein involves
only Case 31 CA-9901
2 The amended complaint alleges that Respondent's Trustee is a succes-
sor il bankruptcy to Respondent. Under Board law, a trustee in bank-
ruptcy is the alter ego of a bankrupt employer and a successor in law vis-
a-vi the Union Marion Sicnrox, Trustee of Wagrner Shipyard and Marina.
Inc.. and Stateside Service. Ic.. d/b/a Stateside Shipyard and Marina, Inc.,
178 N.RB 516, 518 (1969). Thus, Respondent's Trustee is bound by law
to honor any bargaining obligation owed by Respondent to the Union.
and privileged to assert any claims or defenses which Respondent might
have asserted.
257 NLRB No. 61
successor in bankruptcy to Respondent. At all
times material herein, the Union has been, and con-
tinues to be, the exclusive collective-bargaining
representative of certain of Respondent's employ-
ees within an appropriate unit,3 and the Union has
been recognized as such representative by Re-
spondent. Such recognition has been embodied in a
collective-bargaining agreement, which is effective
by its terms from October 1, 1977, through Sep-
tember 30, 1980.
The amended complaint further alleges that com-
mencing on or about October 1, 1979, and at all
times thereafter, Respondent did refuse, and contin-
ues to refuse, to bargain with the Union as the ex-
clusive collective-bargaining representative of all
the employees in the above-described unit in that
since on or about October 1, 1979, and continuing
to date, Respondent (1) has failed and refused to
pay to the Union dues and initiation fees withheld
from employees in the unit described above during
the period from October 1, 1979, through Decem-
ber 15, 1979; (2) has failed and refused to pay to
the Building Service Employees Health and Wel-
fare Trust Fund (hereinafter Trust Fund) amounts
due and owing for dental plan coverage as required
by the collective-bargaining agreement for the
period from October 1, 1979, to December 15,
1979.
On March 27, 1981, counsel for the General
Counsel filed directly with the Board a Motion for
Summary Judgment based on the failure of Re-
spondent to file an answer as required by Sections
102.20 and 102.21 of the National Labor Relations
Board Rules and Regulations, Series 8, as amended.
Subsequently, on April 3, 1981, the Board issued an
order transferring the proceeding to the Board and
a Notice To Show Cause why the General Coun-
sel's Motion for Summary Judgment should not be
granted. Respondent and Respondent's Trustee
have filed no responses to the Notice To Show
Cause and, accordingly, the allegations of the
' The amended complaint alleges that the following employees of Re-
spondent constitute an appropriate unit:
Included: All full-time and regular part-time darkroom attendants,
orderlies, food service workers, messengers, housekeeping aides,
receiving clerks, file clerks, central supply technicians, nurses' as-
sistants, maintenance helpers, cashiers, mail/refund cashiers, PBX
operators, respiratory therapy trainees, account clerks, admitting
clerks, utility review clerks, control clerks, insurance billers, key-
punch operators, pharmacy clerks, ward clerks, ER clerks, dieti-
cian's assistants, cooks, discharge clerks, financial counsellors (col-
lectors), senior insurance billers, storekeepers, operating room
technicians, bookkeepers, maintenance men, respiratory therapy
technicians I, LVNs , certified or techs., respiratory therap) tech-
nicians II, LVNs II, medical transcribers, and respiratory therapy
technicians Ill.
Excluded: All other employees. including guards and supervisors as
defined in the Act
581
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Motion for Summary Judgment stand uncontro-
verted.
Upon the entire record in this proceeding, the
Board makes the following:
Ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment
Section 102.20 of the Board's Rules and Regula-
tions, Series 8, as amended, provides as follows:
The respondent shall, within 10 days from the
service of the complaint, file an answer there-
to. The respondent shall specifically admit,
deny, or explain each of the facts alleged in
the complaint, unless the respondent is without
such knowledge, in which case the respondent
shall so state, such statement operating as a
denial. All allegations in the complaint, if no
answer is filed, or any allegation in the com-
plaint not specifically denied or explained in
an answer filed, unless the respondent shall
state in the answer that he is without knowl-
edge, shall be deemed to be admitted to be
true and shall be so found by the Board, unless
good cause to the contrary is shown.
The consolidated complaint and notice of hear-
ing issued on July 29, 1980, and duly served on Re-
spondent, and the amended complaint and notice of
hearing issued on February 6, 1981, and served on
Respondent and Respondent's Trustee, specifically
state that unless an answer to the complaint is filed
by Respondent within 10 days from the service
thereof "all of the allegations in the complaint shall
be deemed to be admitted to be true and shall be so
found by the Board." According to the record
herein, and the uncontroverted allegations of the
Motion for Summary Judgment, Respondent failed
to file any answers to the complaint or to the
amended complaint, within 10 days from their
service.4 On March 30, 1981, counsel for the Gen-
eral Counsel filed the Motion for Summary Judg-
ment herein, and on April 3, 1981, the Board issued
a Notice To Show Cause why the General Coun-
sel's Motion for Summary Judgment should not be
granted. Respondent and Respondent's Trustee did
not file a response to the Notice To Show Cause.
No good cause to the contrary having been shown,
in accordance with the rule set forth above, the al-
legations of the complaint are deemed to be ad-
mitted and found to be true. Accordingly, we grant
the Motion for Summary Judgment.
The record further indicates that counsel for the General Counsel
sent letters to Respondent and Respondent's Trustee on February 18.
181. stating hat a Motion for Summary Judgment would bhe filed due to
Respondent's failure to file an answer to the amended complaint. The
letter to Respondent's Trustee also states that Respondent's Trustee is not
being charged with the commission of any unfair labor practices, hut
only as the trustee in bankruptcy
On the basis of the entire record, the Board
makes the following:
FINDINGS 01: FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF RESPONDENT
Respondent, a California corporation with its
principal place of business in Inglewood, Califor-
nia, was at all times material herein engaged in the
operation of a proprietary hospital until on or
about December 15, 1979. Respondent, in the
course and conduct of its business operations, annu-
ally purchased and received goods or services
valued in excess of $50,000 fromsellers or suppliers
located within the State of California, which sellers
received such goods in substantially the same form
directly from outside the State of California. In the
course and conduct of its business operations, Re-
spondent annually derived gross revenues in excess
of $250,000. Since on or about July 14, 1980, Re-
spondent's Trustee has been duly designated pursu-
ant to an order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of California as the trustee in
bankruptcy of Respondent. By virtue of the above,
Respondent's Trustee is, and has been at all times
material herein, a successor in bankruptcy to Re-
spondent.
We find, on the basis of the foregoing, that Re-
spondent, and its successor in bankruptcy, Re-
spondent's Trustee, are and have been at all times
material herein, an employer engaged in commerce
within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the
Act, and have operated a health care institution
within the meaning of Section 2(14) of the Act,
and that it will effectuate the purposes of the Act
to assert jurisdiction.
II. THE LABOR ORGANIZATION INVOLVED
The Union is, and has been at all times material
herein, a labor organization within the meaning of
Section 2(5) of the Act.
III. THE UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
A. The Unit
The following employees of Respondent consti-
tute a unit appropriate for collective bargaining
within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act:
Included: All full-time and regular part-time
darkroom attendants, orderlies, food service
workers, messengers, housekeeping aides, re-
ceiving clerks, file clerks, central supply
technicians, nurses' assistants, maintenance
helpers, cashiers, mail/refund cashiers, PBX
operators, respiratory therapy trainees, ac-
count clerks, admitting clerks, utility review
582
IMPERIAL HOSPITAl.
clerks, control clerks, insurance billers, key-
punch operators, pharmacy clerks, ward
clerks, ER clerks, dietician's assistants,
cooks, discharge clerks, financial counsellors
(collectors), senior insurance billers, store-
keepers, operating room technicians, book-
keepers, maintenance men, respiratory ther-
apy technicians I, LVNs 1, certified or
techs., respiratory therapy technicians II,
LVNs II, medical transcribers, and respira-
tory therapy technicians Ill.
Excluded: All other employees, including
guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
B. The Bargaining History
At all times material herein, the Union has been
the designated exclusive collective-bargaining rep-
resentative of Respondent's employees in the
above-described unit, and the Union has been rec-
ognized as such representative by Respondent.
Such recognition has been embodied in a collec-
tive-bargaining agreement, which is effective by its
terms from October 1, 1977, through September 30,
1980. At all times material herein, the Union, by
virtue of Section 9(a) of the Act, has been and is
now the exclusive representative of all the employ-
ees in said unit for the purposes of collective bar-
gaining with respect to rates of pay, wages, hours
of employment, and other terms and conditions of
employment.
C. The 8(a)(5) and (1) Charge
Commencing on or about October 1, 1979, and
continuing to date, the Union has requested, and is
requesting, Respondent to bargain collectively with
respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of employ-
ment, and other terms and conditions of employ-
ment, as the exclusive collective-bargaining repre-
sentative of all the employees of Respondent in the
above-described unit. Commencing on or about
October 1, 1979, and at all times thereafter, Re-
spondent did refuse, and continues to refuse, to
bargain collectively with the Union as the exclu-
sive collective-bargaining representative in that
since on or about October 1, 1979, and continuing
to date, Respondent () has failed and refused to
pay to the Union dues and initiation fees withheld
from employees in the unit described above during
the period from October 1, 1979, through Decem-
ber 15, 1979; 5 and (2) has failed and refused to pay
The collective-hargaining agreement provides in pertinent part:
AR TICLE III - CECKOF
Section . Dduction of Initiation Fec and Dues Upon receipt of an
individual. voluntary. written and irrevocable checkoff authorizationl
from an employee included in the bargaining unit. the Employer will
to the Trust Fund amounts due and owing theTrust
Fund for dental plan coverage of employees in the
unit described above for the period October ,
1979, to December 15, 1979.6 Respondent engaged
in the acts and conduct described above without
prior notice to the Union and without having af-
forded the Union an opportunity to negotiate and
bargain as exclusive representative of Respondent's
employees with respect to such acts and conduct.
Accordingly, we find that by the aforementioned
conduct Respondent did refuse to bargain collec-
tively, and is refusing to bargain collectively, with
the Union as the exclusive collective-bargaining
representative of the employees in the unit, and
that Respondent did thereby engage in, and is en-
gaging in, unfair labor practices within the meaning
of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act.
IV. THE EFFECT OF THE UNFAIR ABOR
PRACTICES UPON COMMERCE
The activities of Respondent set forth in section
IIl, above, occurring in connection with the oper-
ations described in section I, above, have a close,
intimate, and substantial relationship to trade, traf-
fic, and commerce among the several States and
tend to lead to labor disputes burdening and ob-
structing commerce and the free flow of com-
merce.
V. THE REMEDY
Having found that Respondent engaged in and is
engaging in unfair labor practices within the mean-
ing of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act, we shall
order Respondent and its Trustee in Bankruptcy to
cease and desist therefrom and to take certain af-
firmative action designed to effectuate the policies
of the Act. We have found that Respondent violat-
ed the Act by failing and refusing to pay to the
Union dues and initiation fees withheld from em-
ployees in the unit during the period from October
1, 1979, through December 15, 1979. We shall
deduct from the pay of such employee on receipt of billing each cal-
endar month a sum equal to that employee's Union initiation fee and
dues which fell due during the immediately preceding month and
only so long as such employee was employed by Employer at the
time such obligations became due In no event shall any charge be
made to an employee which accrued prior to the date of hire or the
date of execution of this Agreement. whichever is later
"The collective-bargaining agreement provides in relevant part
.IR IICLE XI -1IOSPII7:4L. MEDIC.4L ..IAD LIFE
INS t 'R.4 ANCE
Secton 2.
Effective October I, 1979, the employer shall pay the amount of
$26.05 per month for the BSEIU Dental lan coxerage hich
covers each employee and their dependents. Employer agrees that
there shall be a maintenance of benefits to the above referred plan
583
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
therefore order Respondent and its Trustee in
Bankruptcy to cease and desist from engaging in
such conduct and further order that they pay over
to the Union a sum of money, plus interest thereon,
equal to the sum of all dues checked off and not
remitted to the Union.? Additionally, we have
found that Respondent failed and refused to pay to
the Trust Fund amounts due and owing the Trust
Fund for dental plan coverage of employees in the
unit for the period from October 1, 1979, to De-
cember 15, 1979. We shall therefore order that Re-
spondent and its Trustee in Bankruptcy make
whole the employees in the unit by paying all con-
tributions to the Trust Fund, as provided in the
1977-80 collective-bargaining agreement, for the
period from October 1, 1979, through December
15, 1979, which have not been paid.8 Respondent
and its Trustee in Bankruptcy will be required to
preserve and, upon request, make available to au-
thorized agents of the Board all records necessary
or useful in determining compliance with the
Order.
The Board, upon the basis of the foregoing facts
and the entire record, makes the following:
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Imperial Hospital and its Trustee in Bankrupt-
cy, Donald W. Henry, are an employer engaged in
commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and
(7) of the Act.
2. Hospital and Service Employees Union, Local
399, Service Employees International Union, AFL-
CIO, is a labor organization within the meaning of
Section 2(5) of the Act.
3. The following employees constitute a unit ap-
propriate for the purpose of collective bargaining
within the meaning of Section 9(a) of the Act:
Included: All full-time and regular part-time
darkroom attendants, orderlies, food service
workers, messengers, housekeeping aides, re-
ceiving clerks, file clerks, central supply
technicians, nurses' assistants, maintenance
helpers, cashiers, mail/refund cashiers, PBX
7 See Independent Stave Company, 248 NLRB 219, 221 (1980). Interest
upon the sum shall be computed in the manner prescribed in Florida Steel
Corporation, 231 NLRB 651 (1977). See, generally, Isis Plumbing & Heat-
ing Co., 138 NLRB 716 (1962).
s Because the provisions of employee benefit fund agreements are vari-
able and complex, the Board does not provide at the adjudicatory stage
of a proceeding for the addition of interest at a fixed rate on unlawfully
withheld fund payments. We leave to the compliance stage the question
of whether Respondent and Respondent Trustee must pay any additional
amounts into the benefit funds in order to satisfy our "make-whole"
remedy. These additional amounts may be determined, depending upon
the circumstances of each case, by reference to provisions in the docu-
ments governing the funds at issue and, where there are no governing
provisions, to evidence of any loss directly attributable to the unlawful
withholding action, which might include the loss of return on investment
of the portion of funds withheld, additional costs, etc., but not collateral
losses. See Merryweather Optical Company, 240 NLRB 1213 (1979).
operators, respiratory therapy trainees, ac-
count clerks, admitting clerks, utility review
clerks, control clerks, insurance billers, key-
punch operators, pharmacy clerks, ward
clerks, ER clerks, dietician's assistants,
cooks, discharge clerks, financial counsellors
(collectors), senior insurance billers, store-
keepers, operating room technicians, book-
keepers, maintenance men, respiratory ther-
apy technicians I, LVNs I, certified or
techs., respiratory therapy technicians II,
LVNs II, medical transcribers, and respira-
tory therapy technicians III.
Excluded: All other employees, including
guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
4. At all times material herein, the Union has
been the designated exclusive collective-bargaining
representative of Respondent's employees in the
above-described unit.
5. Commencing on or about October 1, 1979,
and at all times thereafter, Respondent did refuse,
and continues to refuse, to bargain collectively
with the Union as the exclusive collective-bargain-
ing representative in that since on or about Octo-
ber 1, 1979, and continuing to date, Respondent (1)
has failed and refused to pay to the Union dues and
initiation fees withheld from employees in the
above-described unit during the period from Octo-
ber 1, 1979, through December 15, 1979; and (2)
has failed and refused to pay to the Trust Fund
amounts due and owing the Trust Fund for dental
plan coverage of employees in the unit described
above for the period October 1, 1979, to December
15, 1979. By the above-described conduct, Re-
spondent has engaged in, and is engaging in, unfair
labor practices within the meaning of Section
8(a)(5) of the Act.
6. By the aforesaid conduct, Respondent has in-
terfered with, restrained, and coerced, and is inter-
fering with, restraining, and coercing, employees in
the exercise of the rights guaranteed them in Sec-
tion 7 of the Act, and thereby has engaged in and
is engaging in unfair labor practices within the
meaning of Section 8(a)(1) of the Act.
7. The aforesaid unfair labor practices are unfair
labor practices affecting commerce within the
meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
ORDER
Pursuant to Section 10(c) of the National Labor
Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Re-
lations Board hereby orders that the Respondent,
Imperial Hospital, Inglewood, California, and its
Trustee in Bankruptcy, Donald W. Henry, their of-
ficers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall:
584
IMPERIAL HOSPITAL
1. Cease and desist from:
(a) Failing and refusing to pay to Hospital and
Service Employees Union, Local 399, Service Em-
ployees International Union, AFL-CIO, herein the
Union, dues and initiation fees withheld from em-
ployees in the unit during the period from October
1, 1979, through December 15, 1979, as required by
its collective-bargaining agreement with the Union,
effective by its terms through September 30, 1980.
(b) Failing and refusing to pay to the Trust Fund
amounts due and owing the Trust Fund for dental
plan coverage of employees in the unit for the
period from October 1, 1979, to December 15,
1979, as required by its aforesaid collective-bar-
gaining agreement with the Union.
(c) Refusing to bargain collectively with the
Union concerning rates of pay, wages, hours, and
other terms and conditions of employment. The
bargaining unit is:
Included: All full-time and regular part-time
darkroom attendants, orderlies, food service
workers, messengers, housekeeping aides, re-
ceiving clerks, file clerks, central supply
technicians, nurses' assistants, maintenance
helpers, cashiers, mail/refund cashiers, PBX
operators, respiratory therapy trainees, ac-
count clerks, admitting clerks, utility review
clerks, control clerks, insurance billers, key-
punch operators, pharmacy clerks, ward
clerks, ER clerks, dietician's assistants,
cooks, discharge clerks, financial counsellors
(collectors), senior insurance billers, store-
keepers, operating room technicians, book-
keepers, maintenance men, respiratory ther-
apy technicians I, LVNs I, certified or
techs., respiratory therapy technicians II,
LVNs II, medical transcribers, and respira-
tory therapy technicians III.
Excluded: All other employees, including
guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
(d) In any like or related manner interfering
with, restraining, or coercing employees in the ex-
ercise of the rights guaranteed them in Section 7 of
the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action which
the Board finds will effectuate the policies of the
Act:
(a) Remit to the Union any and all union dues
and initiation fees withheld from employees and
not yet remitted to the Union during the period
from October 1, 1979, through December 15, 1979,
in the manner set forth in the remedy section of
this Decision.
(b) Make all payments owed to the Trust Fund
for dental plan coverage of employees in the unit
for the period from October 1, 1979, to December
15, 1979.
(c) Preserve and, upon request, make available to
authorized agents of the Board or its agents, for ex-
amination and copying, all payroll records, social
security payment records, timecards, personnel re-
cords and reports, and all other records necessary
to analyze the moneys due under the terms of this
Order.
(d) Post at the facility in Inglewood, California,
copies of the attached notice marked "Appendix." 9
Copies of said notice, on forms provided by the
Regional Director for Region 31, after being duly
signed by Respondent's and Respondent's Trustee's
representative, shall be posted by them immediately
upon receipt thereof, and be maintained by them
for 60 consecutive days thereafter, in conspicuous
places, including allplaces where notices to em-
ployees are customarily posted. Reasonable steps
shall be taken by Respondent and Respondent's
Trustee to insure that said notices are not altered,
defaced, or covered by any other material.
(e) Notify the Regional Director for Region 31,
in writing, within 20 days from the date of this
Order, what steps Respondent and Respondent's
Trustee have taken to comply herewith.
9 In the event that this Order is enforced by a Judgment of a United
States Court of Appeals, the words in the notice reading "Posted by
Order of the National Labor Relations Board" shall read "Posted Pursu-
ant to a Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an
Order of the National Labor Relations Board."
APPENDIX
NOTICE To EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The Act gives employees the following rights:
To engage in self-organization
To form, join, or assist any union
To bargain collectively through repre-
sentatives of their own choice
To engage in activities together for the
purpose of collective bargaining or other
mutual aid or protection
To refrain from the exercise of any or all
such activities.
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to pay to the
Union dues and initiation fees withheld from
employees in the unit during the period from
October 1, 1979, through December 15, 1979,
as required by our collective-bargaining agree-
ment with the Union.
585
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to pay to the
Trust Fund amounts due and owing the Trust
Fund for dental plan coverage of employees in
the unit for the period from October 1, 1979,
to December 15, 1979, as required by our col-
lective-bargaining agreement with the Union.
WE WILL NOT refuse to bargain collectively
concerning rates of pay, wages, hours, and
other terms and conditions of employment
with Hospital and Service Employees Union,
Local 399, Service Employees International
Union, AFL-CIO, as the exclusive representa-
tive of the employees in the bargaining unit
described below. The bargaining unit is:
Included: All full-time and regular part-time
darkroom attendants, orderlies, food service
workers, messengers, housekeeping aides, re-
ceiving clerks, file clerks, central supply
technicians, nurses' assistants, maintenance
helpers, cashiers, mail/refund cashiers, PBX
operators, respiratory therapy trainees, ac-
count clerks, admitting clerks, utility review
clerks, control clerks, insurance billers, key-
punch operators, pharmacy clerks, ward
clerks, ER clerks, dietician's assistants,
cooks, discharge clerks, financial counsellors
(collectors), senior insurance billers, store-
keepers, operating room technicians, book-
keepers, maintenance men, respiratory ther-
apy technicians I, LVNs I, certified or
techs., respiratory therapy technicians II,
LVNs II, medical transcribers, and respira-
tory therapy technicians III.
Excluded: All other employees, including
guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner
interfere with, restrain, or coerce our employ-
ees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed
them by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL pay over to the Union any and all
dues and initiation fees withheld from employ-
ees during the period from October 1, 1979,
through December 15, 1979, which have not
yet been remitted to the Union, plus interest
thereon.
WE WILL make all payments owed to the
Trust Fund for dental plan coverage of em-
ployees in the unit for the period from Octo-
ber 1, 1979, to December 15, 1979.
WE WILL, upon request, recognize and bar-
gain collectively with the Union as the repre-
sentative of the employees in the above unit
with respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of
work, and other terms and conditions of em-
ployment.
IMPERIAL HOSPITAI.; DONALD W.
HENRY, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY
586