Hytron Radio & Electronics Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsMar 4, 194666 N.L.R.B. 267 (N.L.R.B. 1946) Copy Citation In the Matter of HYTRON RADIO & ELECTRONICS CORP. and UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, C. I. O. Case No. 1-R-2816.Decided March 4, 1946 Richard E. Blake, Esq., of Salem , Mass ., for the Company. Mr. Donald C. Bollen, of Salem , Mass., for the C. I. O. Philip J. Durkin, Esq ., of Salem, Mass ., for the Independent. Mr. Harry R. Ehrlich, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon a petition duly filed by United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, C. I. 0., herein called the C. I. 0., alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the repre- sentation of employees of Hytron Radio & Electronics Corp., Salem, Massachusetts, herein called the Company, the National Labor Re- lations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before John W. Coddaire, Jr., Trial Examiner. The hearing was held at Salem, Massachusetts, on January 23, 1946. The Company, the C. I. 0., and Hytron Employees Union of Massachusetts, herein called the Independent, appeared and participated. All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded opportunity to file briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Hytron Radio & Electronics Corp. is a Massachusetts corporation with its principal plant and office in Salem, Massachusetts . It also 66 N. L. R. B., No. 29. 267 268 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD has plants at Lawrence, Massachusetts, and Newburyport, Massa- chusetts. The Company is engaged in the manufacture and sale of radio and electronic tubes. The Company uses as its principal raw materials copper, nickel, brass, tin, and glass. The value of the raw materials used annually by the Company is in excess of $1,500,000, over 95 percent of which is shipped to points outside the Common- wealth of Massachusetts. The annual value of the manufactured products is in excess of $5,000,000, 90 percent of which is shipped to points outside the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED United Electrical Radio & Machine Workers of America, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations ; and Hytron Em- ployees Union of Massachusetts are labor organizations admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On May 25, 1944, the Company and the Independent entered into a contract which by its terms continued in force for 1 year and from year to year thereafter unless either of the parties should give written notice of their intention to terminate it at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the agreement or any renewal thereof. On April 14, 1945, the Independent notified the Company of its desire not to renew the contract. On May 17, 1945, the Com- pany and the Independent entered into a supplemental agreement extending the contract of May 25, 1944, until such time as negotiations for, a new contract should be completed, and further providing that any new• contract arrived at in such negotiations should be effective as of May 25, 1945. The C. I. 0., by letter dated on or about December 11, 1945, re- quested recognition of the Company as the bargaining agent of the employees of the Salem plant of the Company. The negotiations between the Company and the Independent had not resulted in an agreement at the time of the C. I. O.'s request, and had not so resulted at the time of the hearing. The Independent claims that the supplemental agreement of May 17, 1945, raises a bar to a present determination of representatives, contending that it has the effect of a new contract. We do not agree, for the reason that the supplemental agreement is merely an arrangement for an indefinite protraction of the original contract HYTRON RADIO & ELECTRONICS CORP. 269 of May 25, 1944 , pending negotiations for a new contract .' Inasmuch as the extension agreement is of indefinite duration and the contract has been in effect for a period of 1 year, we find that it does not bar a present determination of representatives. A statement of a Board agent, introduced into evidence at the hearing, indicates that the C. I. O. represents a substantial number of employees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate.2 We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 ( 6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT We find, in accord with an agreement of the parties, that all pro- duction and maintenance employees of the Company at its Salem, Massachusetts, plant, including recorders, watchmen, inspectors, matrons, nurses, monitors, instructors, but excluding foremen, super- visors, office and clerical employees, and all other supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among employees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Re- lations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby 1 Daniel Burkhartsmeier Cooperage Co, 49 N. L R B. 428. See also : Matter of Rheem Manufactursng Company , 56 N. L. R. B. 159, and Matter of Great Bear Logging Company, 59 N. L. R. B. 701. 2 The Field Examiner reported that the C. I 0 submitted 191 application cards, bear- ing names of 185 employees listed on the Company's pay roll of December 22, 1945. There are approximately 360 employees in the appropriate unit The Independent relied upon its contract with the Company as evidence of its interest. 270 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Hytron Radio & Electronics Corp., Salem, Massachusetts, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and super- vision of the Regional Director for the First Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to determine whether they desire to be represented by United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, or by Hytron Em- ployees Union of Massachusetts, unaffiliated, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. MR. GERARD D. REILLY took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation