Hughes Tool Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsNov 27, 194245 N.L.R.B. 821 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In the Matter of HUGHES TOOL COMPANY and UNITED STEELWORKERS OF "AmERICAi LOCAL'UNIONS Nos . 1749, AND 2457, C. I. O. Case No. R-J442.-Decided November 27, 1942 Jurisdiction : tools and airplane parts manufacturing industry. Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question: re- fusal to accord union recognition until certified by the Board ; immediate elec- tion directed notwithstanding request of Company for its postponement because of contemplated increase of personnel. Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : all production and maintenance em- ployees of Company's two plants, with specified inclusions and exclusions. 'Mr. W. M. Streetman, of Houston, Tex., for the Company. Mandell d; Wright, by Mr. Arthur J. Mandell and Mr. Frank A., Hardesty, of Houston, Tex.; for the Steelworkers. Mr. A. G. McNeese, Jr., and Mr. J. D. Pruett, of Houston, Tex., for the Independent. Miss Viola James, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon petition duly filed by United Steelworkers of America, Local Unions Nos. 1742 and 2457, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, herein called the Steelworkers, alleging that a question affecting, commerce had-arisen-concerning the employees of Hughes Tool Company, Houston, Texas, herein called the Company, the Na- tional Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Elmer P. Davis, Trial Examiner. Said hear- ing was held at Houston, Texas, on October 23 and 24, 1942. The Company, the Steelworkers, and Independent Metal Workers Union, Locals 1 and 2, herein called the Independent, appeared, participated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross- examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. 45 N. L. R. B., No. 124. 821 822 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD On November 2, both the Steelworkers and the Independent filed briefs, which the Board has considered. The Independent, in its brief, moved to dismiss the petition on the grounds (1) that a contract be- tween the Company and the Independent is a bar to an election; (2) that there has been no substantial change in union membership among the Company's employees since the Board election held in August 1941; 1 and (3) because of the current increase in the Company's per- sonnel, an election at the present time might,not reflect,the sentimdnt of the employees a few months from now. For the reasons appearing herein, the motion is hereby denied. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Hughes Tool Company, a Delaware corporation with its principal office and place of business in Houston, Texas, is engaged in the manufacture, sale, and distribution of. oil •well•Arilling tools, and in the manufacture of airplane parts for-the United States Government. For these purposes it operates two plants, the Hughes Tool Company main plant in Houston, and the nearby Aircraft Strut Division plant. The employees of both plants are involved herein. The principal raw material used is steel, and, during 1941, the Company purchased raw material valued in excess of $1,000,000, at least 90 percent of which was purchased outside the State of Texas. During the first 6 months of 1942, the Company purchased over $500,000 worth of steel which was delivered to its plants from points outside the State of Texas, and sold and delivered products valued in excess of $700,000, to purchas- ers outside the State of Texas. The Company admits, and we find, that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED United Steelworkers of America, Local Unions Nos. 1742 and 2457, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, and Inde- pendent Metal Workers Union, Locals 1 and 2, are labor organizations, each admitting to membership employees of the company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On or about July 15, 1942, the Steelworkers requested recognition as the bargaining agent for the Company's employees. The Company 'Matter of Hughes Tool Company and Independent Metal Workers Union Locals Nog 1 and 2, 36 N. L. R. B. 904. HUGHES TOOL COMPANY 823 refused because of a contract which it has with the Independent, and suggested that the Steelworkers refer the matter to the Board. The Independent contends that its bargaining contract with the Company is a bar to the present proceeding. The contract which was entered into, following certification of the Independent as a result of the 1941 Board election,2 expires January 12, 1943. As it is less than 2 months until the expiration date, we find that the contract is not a bar to an election at this time. At the hearing, evidence submitted to the Trial-Examiner indicates that the Steelworkers and the Independent each represents a substan- tial number of employees in the unit hereinafter found to be appropriate.3 We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. Iv. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The parties agree that the appropriate unit is substantially the same as that found by the Board in the previous case 4 involving the Com- pany's employees at the main plant, and should include employees at both the main plant and the Aircraft Strut Division plant who fall within the categories set out by the Board in the previous case. The parties also agree to include three classes of employees who have been employed since the establishment of the prior unit. These are cafeteria employees, janitresses and matrons,'and employees in a new secret 'See footnote 1. In the 1941 election , the Independent received 1,601 votes , and the Steel Workers Organizing Committee , predecessor of the Steelworkers , received 950 votes. These figures in comparison with the present representation percentages appearing in foot- note 3 indicate that union membership among the Company 's employees has changed con- siderably . Moreover, there has been a considerable increase in the number of employees since that time. The Steelworkers submitted authorization cards of approximately 56 percent of the employees in the appropriate unit as shown by the Company's pay roll of October 18, 1942; all the cards bore apparently genuine original signatures ; and the majority of the cards 1942. The Independent submitted authorization cards of approximately 521/2 percent of the employees in the appropriate unit as shown by the Company 's pay roll of October 18, 1942; all the cards bore apparently genuine original signatures ; and the majority . of the, cards were dated prior to 1942 , with approximately one-fourth dated in 1942. ' In the Matter of Hughes Tool Company and Independent Metal Workers Union Locals Nos. 1 and 2, 33 N. L R . B. 1089 , the Board found that the appropriate unit consisted of "all production and maintenance employees of the Company , including Class C colored employees in the maintenance department and those assigned to the general machine shop and inspection department ; janitors ; Class C colored common laborers working in the forge shop and in the heat-treat and foundry-shop departments ; the colored employee working In the pattern shop ; shipping -department employees ; material -control-department employees ; shop clerks ; machinists , mechanics , helpeis, and laborers attached to the engineering de- partment ; and the five colored truck drivers in the maintenance department , but excluding executive , supervisory , clerical , office, and .professional employees ; printing-shop employees; personnel -department employees; sales -department employees other than those employed In the shipping department ; accounting-department employees other than shop clerks ; day office porters , garage employees ; production -department employees ; and engineers , drafts- men, chemists , metallurgists , and clerical employees of the engineering department." 0) 824 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD department who are classified on the Company's, books as F and E employees, and who perform work comparable to that of employees in the heat-treat department, who were included in the prior unit. The parties agree to exclude parking lot girls, who are a part of the Com- pany's plant-protection force. They also agree that "the 5 colored truck drivers" included in the prior unit should be changed to "all colored truck drivers." The only issue is as to the station wagon drivers whom the Independent would include. The Company and the Steelworkers take no position as to them.' The station wagon drivers' duties are to drive station wagons on scheduled trips between the two plants, carrying mail, blue prints, and passengers. We shall include them in the unit. With this inclusion, we shall adopt the unit previ- ously found appropriate and also adopt the modifications and addi- tions agreed upon by the parties. We accordingly find that all production and maintenance employees of the Company at its main plant and Aircraft Strut Division plant, including Class C colored employees in the maintenance department and- those assigned to the general machine shop and inspection depart- ment; cafeteria employees; janitors, janitresses , and matrons; Class C colored common laborers working in the forge shop and in the heat- treat and foundry-shop departments; employees classified on the Com- pany's books as F and E employees; the colored, employees working in the pattern shop; shipping-department employees; material-control- department employees; shop clerks; machinists, mechanics, helpers, and laborers attached to the engineering department; the colored truck drivers in the maintenance department; and station wagon drivers, but excluding executives, supervisory, clerical, office, and professional em- ployees; printing-shop employees; personnel-department employes; sales-department employees other than those employed in the shipping department; accounting-department employees other than shop clerks; day office porters; garage employees; parking lot girls; production- department employees; 5 and engineers, draftsmen, chemists,'metallur- gists, and clerical employees of the engineering department, constitute a unit appropriate 'for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVTS dk The Independent urges that, since the Company's pay roll is con- stantly expanding, an election should not be held at the present time because the results thereof might not reflect the sentiment of the em- ployees a few months from now. The record shows that the Company now employs about 50 percent of the number expected to be employed 5 Production -department employees in the previous unit were defined as time-study em- ployees and order writers. HUGHES TOOL COMPANY 825 at these two plants by November 1943. We do not believe that the large number of employees who are now working at both plants should be deprived at the present time of their right to bargain collectively. We shall, therefore, proceed with an immediate determination of representatives.6 . The Steelworkers suggested that eligibility to vote be determined by reference to the pay-roll period nearest the hearing, but gave no reason for the preference. We shall follow our usual practice of using a current pay-roll date, and shall direct that the question concerning representation which has-arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the employees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Hughes Tool Com- pany, Houston, Texas, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Sixteenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Section 10, of said Rules and Regulations, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including any such employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active military service or training of the United-States, or temporarily laid off, but excluding any who have since quit or, been discharged for cause, to determine whether they desire 'to be represented by United Steel- workers of America, Local Unions Nos. 1742 and 2457, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, or by Independent Metal Workers Union, Locals 1, and 2, for the purposes of collective bargain- ing, or by neither. See Matter of Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Company and International Asso- ciation of Machinists Local 804 (A F. of L.), 38 N. L. R. B. 404; and Matter of Buick Motor Division, General Motors Corporation and Die t Tool Makers Lodge #113, International As- sociation of Machinists, (A. F. of L.), et at, 40 N L. R. B. 825. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation