Hubert A. Williams, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (New York Metro and Northeast Areas), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 4, 1999
05990388 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 4, 1999)

05990388

11-04-1999

Hubert A. Williams, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (New York Metro and Northeast Areas), Agency.


Hubert A. Williams v. United States Postal Service

05990388

November 4, 1999

Hubert A. Williams, )

Appellant, )

) Request No. 05990388

v. ) Appeal No. 01981408

) Agency No. 4A-100-0153-97

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

(New York Metro and )

Northeast Areas), )

Agency. )

)

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

On February 13, 1999, Hubert A. Williams (appellant) timely initiated a

request to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the Commission)

to reconsider the decision in Hubert A. Williams v. William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01981408

(January 14, 1999). EEOC regulations provide that the Commissioners

may, in their discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision.

29 C.F.R. �1614.407(a). The party requesting reconsideration must

submit written argument or evidence which tends to establish one or

more of the following three criteria: (1) new and material evidence is

available that was not readily available when the previous decision was

issued, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(1); (2) the previous decision involved

an erroneous interpretation of law or regulation, or material fact,

or a misapplication of established policy, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(2);

and (3) the decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(3). Appellant's request

is denied.

After a review of appellant's request for reconsideration, the previous

decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds appellant's request

does not meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(a), and it is the

decision of the Commission to deny appellant's request. The decision

in EEOC Appeal No. 01981408 remains the Commission's final decision in

this matter. The agency shall comply with the ORDER in the previous

decision, as restated below. There is no further right of administrative

appeal on the decision of the Commission on this Request to Reconsider.

ORDER (E1092)

The agency shall supplement the record with an affidavit from the

EEO Counselor addressing whether appellant raised allegations 10 and

11<1> with an EEO Counselor.<2> The agency shall then redetermine

whether allegations 10 and 11 should be dismissed pursuant to 29

C.F.R. �1614.107(b). Within 30 days of the date this decision becomes

final, the agency shall either issue a letter to appellant accepting

allegations 10 and 11 for investigation or issue a new decision dismissing

allegations 10 and 11. A copy of the letter accepting allegations 10

and 11 or new decision dismissing allegations 10 and 11 must be sent to

the Compliance Officer as referenced herein.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The

agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report

shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The appellant also has the right to

file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order

prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See

29 C.F.R. ��1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action" 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See

29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0993)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court. It

is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file a civil

action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. You should

be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have interpreted

the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that a civil action

must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action is considered

timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS

from the date that you receive this decision or to consult an attorney

concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction in which your

action would be filed. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE

DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The

grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the

Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in

which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

11/04/99

_______________ _________________________________

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

1Allegation No. 10 states that on the basis of race (Black) and sex (male),

on July 18, 1997, appellant was charged with 8 hours AWOL, when he worked

and was not paid. Allegation No. 11 states that on the basis of race

(Black) and sex (male), on July 21, 1997, appellant was removed from his

bid position, sent to Old Chelsea Station, and was replaced by another

employee.

2In response to appellant's request for reconsideration, the agency

provides evidence that in the course of complying with the decision below,

it determined that allegations 10 and 11 were accepted for investigation

in connection with another complaint, and accordingly should be dismissed.

Despite the evidence provided herein, the agency is obligated to issue

a new FAD in accordance with the Commission's Order.