Hsing-chow Hwang, Petitioner,v.Gordon R. England, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 25, 2005
03a50033 (E.E.O.C. May. 25, 2005)

03a50033

05-25-2005

Hsing-chow Hwang, Petitioner, v. Gordon R. England, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Hsing-chow Hwang v. Department of the Navy

03A50033

May 25, 2005

.

Hsing-chow Hwang,

Petitioner,

v.

Gordon R. England,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Petition No. 03A50033

MSPB No. PH-0752-03-0109-I-1

DISMISSAL OF PETITION

On February 12, 2005, the petitioner filed a timely petition with the

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) for review

of the final order of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) dated

March 9, 2004.

The petitioner claimed before the MSPB that he was discriminated against

based on his national origin (Asian) and age (born in 1940)<1> when he

was terminated effective December 6, 2002 under the charge of failure

to retain his eligibility to a sensitive position and revocation of his

security clearance due to his personal conduct. In its initial decision,

the MSPB upheld the removal for the reason charged. It found that the

discrimination claim was not reviewable by the Board because it was

precluded from reviewing allegations of prohibited discrimination in

connection with the suspension or revocation of a security clearance.

In its final order, the Board denied the petitioner's petition for

review of the initial decision. The final order contained a right to

review of his discrimination claim to the EEOC, or if he did not request

such review, the right to file a civil action in the appropriate United

States district court.

On April 12, 2004, the petitioner filed a civil action (identified as

Civil Action No. 1:04-cv-01663-RBK-JBR) in the United States District

Court for the New Jersey (Camden).<2> The record further discloses that

the claims raised therein are the same as those raised in his appeal to

the MSPB and the instant petition before the EEOC. The regulation found

at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409 provides that the filing of a civil action "shall

terminate Commission processing of the appeal." Commission regulations

mandate dismissal of the EEO petition under these circumstances so as to

prevent the petitioner from simultaneously pursuing both administrative

and judicial remedies on the same matters, wasting resources, and creating

the potential for inconsistent or conflicting decisions, and in order

to grant due deference to the authority of the federal district court.

See Stromgren v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05891079

(May 7, 1990); Sandy v. Department of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 01893513

(October 19, 1989); Kotwitz v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05880114 (October

25, 1988). Accordingly, the petitioner's petition is hereby dismissed.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the

Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in

which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 25, 2005

__________________

Date

1A summary of a telephonic prehearing conference report by an MSPB

Administrative Judge (AJ) and the MSPB's initial decision indicated that

the petitioner only raised national origin discrimination. However,

the petitioner's statement of facts and issues, filed recently before

the prehearing conference report, indicated he raised national origin

and age discrimination.

2The court's electronic docket indicates that as of May 18, 2005, the

civil action was still pending.