Hotel Syracuse/Radisson Plaza

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Aug 31, 2000

331 N.L.R.B. 191 (N.L.R.B. 2000)

331 NLRB No. 191
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
Board volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex-
ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.
20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can
be included in the bound volumes.
Allegro Properties, Inc. d/b/a The Hotel Syra-
cuse/Radisson Plaza and Hotel Employees and
Restaurant Employees Local 150, AFL–CIO,
CLC. Case 3–CA–22348
August 31, 2000
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN TRUESDALE AND MEMBERS FOX
AND LIEBMAN
Upon a charge filed by the Union on February 14,
2000, the General Counsel of the National Labor Rela-
tions Board issued a complaint on May 24, 2000, against
Allego Properties, Inc. d/b/a The Hotel Syra-
cuse/Radisson Plaza, the Respondent, alleging that it has
violated Section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor
Relations Act. Although properly served copies of the
charge and complaint, the Respondent failed to file an
answer.
On July 28, 2000, the General Counsel filed a Motion
for Default Summary Judgment with the Board. On Au-
gust 2, 2000, the Board issued an order transferring the
proceeding to the Board and a Notice to Show Cause
why the motion should not be granted. The Respondent
filed no response. The allegations in the motion are
therefore undisputed.
The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its
authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel.
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment
Sections 102.20 and 102.21 of the Board’s Rules and
Regulations provide that the allegations in the complaint
shall be deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within
14 days from service of the complaint, unless good cause
is shown. In addition, the complaint affirmatively notes
that unless an answer is filed within 14 days of service,
all the allegations in the complaint will be considered
admitted. Further, the undisputed allegations in the Mo-
tion for Summary Judgment disclose that the Region, by
letter dated July 3, 2000, notified the Respondent that
unless an answer were received by July 10, 2000, a Mo-
tion for Summary Judgment would be filed.
In the absence of good cause being shown for the fail-
ure to file a timely answer, we grant the General Coun-
sel’s Motion for Summary Judgment.1

1 In the complaint, the General Counsel seeks an order requiring the
Respondent to preserve and, on request, provide at the office designated
by the Board or its agents, copies of specified records necessary to
analyze the amounts due under the terms of the Board’s Order, includ-
ing electronic copies, if such records are stored in electronic form.
The Order makes clear that electronic documents, if they exist, must
be supplied. See Bryant & Stratton Business Institute, 327 NLRB No.
174, slip op. 1 fn. 3 (1999). With respect to the General Counsel’s
proposed requirement that the Respondent submit copies of the neces-
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a corporation
with an office and place of business in Syracuse, New
York, has been engaged in the operation of a hotel pro-
viding food and lodging. Annually, the Respondent, in
conducting its business operations, derives gross reve-
nues in excess of $500,000, and purchases and receives
at its Syracuse, New York facility, products, goods, and
materials valued in excess of $5000 directly from points
outside the State of New York. We find that the Re-
spondent is an employer engaged in commerce within the
meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and (7) of the Act, and that
the Union is a labor organization within the meaning of
Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
The following employees of the Respondent constitute
a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargain-
ing within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act:
The unit described in Article I of the most recent col-
lective-bargaining agreement between Respondent and
the Union effective from November 1, 1999 through
October 31, 2002.
At all material times, the Union has been the desig-
nated exclusive collective-bargaining representative of
the above unit for the purposes of collective bargaining
with respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of employ-
ment, and other terms and conditions of employment,
and the Union has been recognized as the representative
by the Respondent. This recognition has been embodied
in successive collective-bargaining agreements, the most
recent of which is effective from November 1, 1999
through October 31, 2002.
At all material times, based on Section 9(a) of the Act,
the Union has been the exclusive collective-bargaining
representative of the unit.
From on about August 1, 1999 through January 31,
2000, the Respondent failed to continue in full force and
effect all of the terms and conditions of the collective-
bargaining agreement described above by failing to remit
to the Union deducted dues for the months of September,
October, November, and December 1999, and January
2000, as required under article III of the agreement.
The subject set forth above relates to wages, hours, and
other terms and conditions of employment of the unit

sary records at the office designated by the Board or its agents, the
Board has invited and received supplemental briefing on this issue in
Ferguson Electric Co. Inc., 34–CA–7875, which is pending before the
Board. We find no reason, however, to hold the instant case in abey-
ance or to defer consideration of the General Counsel’s Motion for
Summary Judgment until the issuance of the Board’s decision in Fer-
guson. Accordingly, we will adhere to the Board’s standard order
language in the present case.
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

2
employees, and is a mandatory subject for the purposes
of collective bargaining.
The Respondent engaged in the conduct described
above without prior notice to the Union, without afford-
ing the Union an opportunity to bargain with the Re-
spondent with respect to this conduct and the effects of
this conduct, and without the consent of the Union.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By the acts and conduct described above, the Respon-
dent has been failing and refusing to bargain collectively
and in good faith with the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of its employees within the
meaning of Section 8(d) of the Act, and has thereby en-
gaged in unfair labor practices affecting commerce
within the meaning of Section 8(a)(1) and (5) and Sec-
tion 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having
found that the Respondent has violated Section 8(a)(5)
and (1), we shall order the Respondent to remit to the
Union deducted union dues and fees for the months of
September, October, November, and December 1999,
and January 2000, owed for those unit employees who
had authorized the Respondent to deduct and remit them
to the Union pursuant to article III of the parties’ collec-
tive-bargaining agreement, with interest as prescribed in
New Horizons for the Retarded, 283 NLRB 1173 (1987).
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Allegro Properties, Inc. d/b/a The Hotel
Syracuse/Radisson Plaza, Syracuse, New York, its offi-
cers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Failing and refusing to continue in full force and
effect all of the terms and conditions of its collective-
bargaining agreement with Hotel Employees and Restau-
rant Employees Local 150, AFL–CIO, CLC by failing to
remit to the Union, as required under article III of the
agreement, dues for the months of September, October,
November, and December 1999, and January 2000, de-
ducted from the pay of unit employees pursuant to valid
dues-checkoff authorizations executed by the employees.
The appropriate bargaining unit is:
The unit described in Article I of the most recent col-
lective-bargaining agreement between Respondent and
the Union effective from November 1, 1999 through
October 31, 2002.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exe rcise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) Remit to the Union the dues that were deducted
from the pay of unit employees pursuant to valid dues-
checkoff authorizations executed by employees and
which have not been remitted for September, October,
November, December 1999, and January 2000, with in-
terest as set forth in the remedy section of this decision.
(b) Preserve and, within 14 days of a request, make
available to the Board or its agents for examination and
copying, all payroll records, social security payment re-
cords, timecards, personnel records and reports, and all
other records, including an electronic copy of such re-
cords if stored in electronic form, necessary to analyze
the amounts due under the terms of this Order.
(c) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in Syracuse, New York, copies of the attached
notice marked “Appendix”.2 Copies of the notice, on
forms provided by the Regional Director for Region 3,
after being signed by the Respondent’s authorized repre-
sentative, shall be posted by the Respondent and main-
tained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places
including all places where notices to employees are cus-
tomarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the
Respondent to ensure that the notices are not altered,
defaced, or covered by any other material. In the event
that, during the pendency of these proceedings, the Re-
spondent has gone out of business or closed the facility
involved in these proceedings, the Respondent shall du-
plicate and mail, at its own expense, a copy of the notice
to all current employees and former employees employed
by the Respondent at any time since August 1, 1999.
(d) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
Dated, Washington, D.C. August 31, 2000
Dated, Washington, D.C.

John C. Truesdale, Chairman

Sarah M. Fox, Member

Wilma B. Liebman, Member

(SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

2 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
THE HOTEL SYRACUSE/RADISSON PLAZA

3

APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government

The National Labor Relations Board has found that we
violated the National Labor Relations Act and has or-
dered us to post and abide by this notice.
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to continue in full force
and effect all of the terms and conditions of our collec-
tive-bargaining agreement with Hotel Employees and
Restaurant Employees Local 150, AFL–CIO, CLC by
failing to remit to the Union, as required under article III
of the agreement, dues for the months of September, Oc-
tober, November, and December 1999, and January
2000, deducted from the pay of unit employees pursuant
to valid dues-checkoff authorizations executed by the
employees. The appropriate bargaining unit is:
The unit described in Article I of the most recent col-
lective-bargaining agreement between us and the Union
effective from November 1, 1999 through October 31,
2002.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL remit to the Union the dues that were de-
ducted from the pay of unit employees pursuant to valid
dues-checkoff authorizations executed by the employees
and which have not been remitted for September, Octo-
ber, November, December 1999, and January 2000, with
interest.
ALLEGRO PROPERTIES, INC. D/B/A THE HOTEL SYRA-
CUSE/RADISSON PLAZA