Haywood B. Thorbs, Complainant,v.Leon E. Panetta, Secretary, Department of Defense (Defense Commissary Agency), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 16, 2011
0120112481 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 16, 2011)

0120112481

12-16-2011

Haywood B. Thorbs, Complainant, v. Leon E. Panetta, Secretary, Department of Defense (Defense Commissary Agency), Agency.




Haywood B. Thorbs,

Complainant,

v.

Leon E. Panetta,

Secretary,

Department of Defense

(Defense Commissary Agency),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120112481

Agency No. DECA000412011

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated March 10, 2011, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant

worked as a Lead Commissary Support Clerk, GS-303-05, at the Hill

Air Force Base Commissary, in Davis County, Utah. On December 24,

2010, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency

subjected him to discrimination on the bases of race and color when:

(1) he received a letter of concern regarding sick leave; and (2) he

was subjected to harassment.

The Agency dismissed the claims pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(7)

for failure to cooperate. The Agency’s final decision stated that

Complainant failed to clarify his allegations. The Agency’s final

decision also noted that Complainant was sent a notice asking him

to provide information in support of his claims, and was warned that

failure to respond within 15 days of its receipt may result in dismissal

of the complaint. The Agency asserts that Complainant did not provide

the requested information.

Generally, it is only in cases where the complainant has engaged in

delay or contumacious conduct and the record is insufficient to permit

adjudication that the Commission has allowed a complaint to be dismissed

for failure to cooperate. See Card v. U.S. Postal Service, EEOC Request

No. 05970095 (April 23, 1998). In the instant case, we find, based on

our review of the record that the Agency’s final decision improperly

dismissed the complaint for failure to cooperate.

We note that sufficient information exists in the record which clearly

identifies Complainant’s claims. The EEO counseling report identifies

Complainant’s race as Black and the date of the alleged discriminatory

event as October 26, 2010. The EEO counseling report and formal complaint

includes pages of handwritten statements from Complainant describing his

claims, including the names of alleged responsible management officials

and relevant dates. In addition, the record provides numerous documents

relevant to Complainant’s claims, including the alleged Letter of

Concern which is dated October 26, 2010.

Moreover, the record contains a letter from Complainant dated February 14,

2011, in response to the Agency’s request for clarifying information

which restates allegations previously made that on October 26, 2010, the

store administrator (S1) and store director (S2) discriminated against him

by issuing a Letter of Concern for sick leave abuse. Complainant further

explained that he submitted all the correct documentation, leave forms,

and doctors’ excuses which had been approved by S1. Complainant also

stated that his White co-worker (C1) was also issued a Letter of Concern

during the relevant time-frame. S1 allegedly called C1 into his office to

discuss the Letter of Concern and thereafter removed and destroyed C1’s

Letter of Concern. Yet, S1 did not discuss Complainant’s Letter of

Concern with Complainant or remove it from his files. Complainant also

summarized his harassment claim that since his arrival at the Hill Air

Force Base Commissary, S1 has treated the White workers more preferably

than the minority workers, which caused a hostile work environment.

We find that the record is sufficient to allow adjudication of the claims

as defined herein. Any additional evidence necessary to adjudicate

the complaint should be gathered during the EEO investigation process.

Accordingly, the Agency’s final decision is REVERSED. This matter

is REMANDED to the Agency for further processing in accordance with the

ORDER below.

ORDER (E0610)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. § 1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue

to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant’s request.

A copy of the Agency’s letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission’s corrective action is mandatory.

The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC

20013. The Agency’s report must contain supporting documentation, and

the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the

Agency does not comply with the Commission’s order, the Complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. §�

�1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission’s order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled “Right to File a Civil

Action.” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

“Agency” or “department” means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

December

16, 2011

____________________________ __________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director Date

Office of Federal Operations

2

01-2011-2481

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013