Hat Corp. of AmericaDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsFeb 11, 194665 N.L.R.B. 975 (N.L.R.B. 1946) Copy Citation In the Matter Of HAT CORPORATION OF AMERICA and OFFICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL, LOCAL 90 Case No. 2-B-5879.-Decided February 11, 1946 McLanahan, Memitt and Ingraham, by Mr. Richard S. Buell, of New York City, for the Company. Mr. James B. Rice, of Stamford, Conn., for the Union. Mr. S. Roy Remar, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon a petition duly filed by Office Employees International Union, AFL, Local 90, herein called the Union, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of em- ployees of Hat Corporation of America, South Norwalk, Connecticut, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board pro- vided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Richard J. Hickey, Trial Examiner. The hearing was held at South Norwalk, Connecticut, on" November 5, 1945. The Company and the Union appeared and participated. All parties were afforded full opportu- nity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to in- troduce evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY The Company is a Delaware corporation, having its principal office and place of business in South Norwalk, Connecticut, where it operates three plants. It is engaged in the manufacture, sale, and distribution of hats for men and women. In addition, it has offices, plants, and 65 N. L. R. B., No. 172 679100-46-vol 65-63 975 976 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD retail stores in New York City. During the period from October 1, 1944, to September 30, 1945, the Company, in its operations at South Norwalk, Connecticut, used raw materials valued at in excess of $1,000,000, and manufactured products valued at in excess of $5,000,000. Approximately 90 percent of the raw materials was ob- tained from sources outside the State of Connecticut, and, approxi- mately 90 percent of the finished products was shipped to points outside the State of Connecticut. The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. 11. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED Office Employees International Union, Local 90, is a labor organ- ization affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Company has refused to grant recognition to the Union as the exclusive bargaining representative of its clerical employees until the Union has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. A statement of a Field Examiner, introduced into evidence at the hearing, indicates that the Union represents a substantial number of employees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate., We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Union requests a unit comprised of all office and clerical em- ployees, including accountants, senior clerks, junior clerks, secretaries, senior stenographers, junior stenographers, senior typists, junior typists, office machine operators, and telephone operator, who are employed in plants 1 and 2 of the Company located in Norwalk, Con- necticut, excluding factory clerks, stock clerks, shipping clerks, time- keepers, time-study men, part-time and temporary employees, super- visors, and all supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in 'the status of em- ployees, or effectively recommend such action. While the Company agrees with the Union as to the specific composition of the unit, it contends that the clerical employees at its New York City office should be included in the same unit. The Union, on the other hand, states 1 The Field Examiner reported that there were 127 employees in the unit sought by the Union and that the Union submitted 40 application cards. HAT CORPORATION OF AMERICA 977 that its jurisdiction is limited to the area extending from Greenwich, Connecticut, to but not including Bridgeport, Connecticut, and that it has made no attempt to organize employees in the New York City office. The Company's main offices are located in plants 1 and 2 in South Norwalk, Connecticut, and, in addition, it maintains an office in New York City. There is no interchange of clerical employees between the South Norwalk and New York offices. However, there is an inter- change of clerical employees between plants 1 and 2 located in South Norwalk, which are approximately 100 yards distant. In view of the Union's lack of jurisdiction over employees outside the area extending ,from Greenwich, Connecticut, to but not including Bridgeport, Con- necticut, and the limited scope of its organization, and because the office and clerical employees of the Company at its South Norwalk offices constitute a distinct group independent of the employees at the New York office, we shall restrict the unit to the office and clerical employees at South Norwalk. We find that all office and clerical employees of the Company at its offices in plants 1 and 2 in South Norwalk, Connecticut, including accountants, senior clerks, junior clerks, secretaries, senior stenog- raphers, junior stenographers, senior typists, junior typists, office machine operators, and telephone operator, excluding factory clerks, stock clerks, shipping clerks, timekeepers, time-study men, part-time and temporary employees, supervisors, and all other supervisory'em- ployees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or other- wise effect changes in the, status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collec- tive bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em- ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay- roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Elec- tion herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain represent- atives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Hat Corporation 978 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD of America, South Norwalk, Connecticut, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date-of this Direction, under the direction and super- vision of the Regional Director for the Second Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during the said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vaca- tion or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been dis- charged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to determine whether or not they desire to be rep- resented by Office Employees International Union, AFL, Local 90, for the purposes of collective bargaining. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation