Harris-Seybold-Potter Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsFeb 26, 194665 N.L.R.B. 1423 (N.L.R.B. 1946) Copy Citation In the Matter Of HARRIS-SEYBOLD-POTTER COMPANY and UNITED ELEC- TRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, C. I. O. Case No. 9-R-1951.-Decided February 26, 1946 Messrs. C. C. Sorenson and G. C. Houck, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Mr. D. E. Dredge, of Dayton, Ohio, for the Company. Messrs. Forrest Payne and Leonard Goar, of Dayton, Ohio, for the Union. Mr. Julius Topol, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon a petition duly filed by United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, C. I. 0., herein called the Union, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Harris-Seybold-Potter Company, Dayton, Ohio, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before James A. Shaw, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at Dayton, Ohio, on November 20, 1945. The Company and the Union appeared and participated. All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the is- sues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF COMPANY Harris-Seybold-Potter Company, a Delaware corporation, operates two plants in the State of Ohio, one located in Dayton, and the other in Cleveland. We are here concerned with the Company's Dayton plant. At the time of the hearing the Company was engaged in the manufacture, sale, and distribution of paper cutting and paper proc- 65 N. L. R. B., No. 235. 1423 679100-46-vol. 65-91 1424 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD essing machinery and offset printing presses. During, the 12-month period preceding the hearing the Company produced equipment val- ued in excess of $2,000,000, of which 60 percent was shipped to points outside the State of Ohio. The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, is a labor organization admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Company has refused to grant recognition to the Union as the exclusive bargaining representative of the time checkers at its Dayton plant until the Union has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. A statement of a Board agent, introduced into evidence at the hear- ing, indicates that the Union represents a substantial number of em- ployees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate' We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Union seeks an election among all time checkers in the Com- pany's plant at Dayton, Ohio, and requests that, if a majority of those voting in that election select the Union, the time checkers be found to be part of the production and maintenance unit already represented by the Union. In the alternative the Union requests that the time checkers ' be found to constitute a separate appropriate unit. The Company not only opposes the inclusion of the time checkers in the same unit with the production and maintenance employees, but also contends that they are so closely allied with management that they cannot constitute any appropriate unit. The time checkers, of whom there are about 12, work at various locations in the plant area. They are engaged primarily in obtaining data as to time spent by employees on various jobs. Production em- ployees report to the time checkers when they begin and when they complete their job assignments so that their time may be allocated to ' The Field Examiner reported that the Union submitted 8 authorization cards, 6 of which bore the names of time checkers in the Company 's employ. There are approximately 12 employees In the appropriate unit. HARRIS-SEYBOLD-POTTER COMPANY 1425 the proper jobs and recorded by the time checkers on appropriate forms . These records are then sent to the pay-roll department for computation of the employees' earnings and also provide the basis for determining the cost of each job. They exercise no supervision over the production employees and their work, although distinctly differ- ent in type from that of the production employees, is of a routine nature and is not confidential with respect to labor relations matters. Unlike production employees who are hourly paid, the time checkers are paid a monthly salary. On the entire record, we are of the opinion and find that the functions and duties of time checkers are not such as to preclude their inclusion in a collective bargaining unit. We are, however, satisfied that their interest and duties are sufficiently different from those of the production employees to warrant their being set apart in a separate bargaining Unit .2 Accordingly, we find that all time checkers in the Company's plant at Dayton, Ohio, excluding all or any supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes. of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the employees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section. 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby , See Matter of General Motors Corporation , Eastern Aircraft, Trenton Division, 51 N. L. R. B . 1366: see also Matter of Harris-Seybold -Po t ter Company, 63 N L. R. B. 1371, which involved time checkers at the Company ' s Cleveland plant and in which we found a similar unit appropriate. The Company contends , in its brief , that the work of the time checkers in the present case is sufficiently dissimilar to that of the time checkers at its Cleveland plant to warrant a different result. In support of its claim , the Company refers to certain data which the time checkers in the plant here involved are required to compile and which are presumably not required of the time checkers in the Cleveland plant. We are of the opinion that the difference adverted to is one of degree rather than of kind and affords no basis for a different result in the instant case . Accordingly , we find the contention to be without merit. 1426 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Harris-Seybold- Potter Company, Dayton, Ohio, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Ninth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preced- ing the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to determine whether or not they desire to be repre- sented by United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, C. 1. 0., for the purposes of collective bargaining. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation