H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsNov 14, 1955114 N.L.R.B. 978 (N.L.R.B. 1955) Copy Citation 978 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 4. By causing Respondent Company to discriminate against August Serrano in violation of Section 8 (a) (3) of the Act, Respondent Union has engaged in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8 (b) (2) and (1) (A) of the Act. 5.' The aforesaid unfair labor practices are unfair labor practices affecting com- merce within the meaning of Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. [Recommendations omitted from publication.] H. P. Hood & Sons , Inc. and Milk Wagon Drivers and Creamery Workers Union, Local 380, AFL, a/w International Brother- hood of Teamsters , Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, AFL, Petitioner. Case No. 1-RC-4063. November 14,1955 DECISION AND ORDER Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, a hearing was held before Robert S. Fuchs, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are- free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. 1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. 2. The labor organization involved claims to represent employees of the Employer. 3. No question affecting commerce exists concerning the representa- tion of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act, for the following reasons: The Petitioner seeks to represent a unit of all wholesale drivers and helpers employed at the Employer's Charlestown, Massachusetts, milk processing plant, including route foremen. The Employer contends that the unit sought is inappropriate, asserting that the unit should encompass all locations within its region 1, and should also include all production and maintenance employees and retail drivers within that region. The Employer contends further that in the event the Board determines that, a driver unit is appropriate, the unit should then in- clude all wholesale and retail drivers in region 1. The Employer is engaged in the processing and distribution of milk and dairy products. It maintains its principal office in Charlestown, Massachusetts, and operates processing plants and sales distribution stations in the six New England States and in New York State. For administrative purposes its operations are divided into four geo- graphical regions. The Charlestown processing plant is a part of the geographical area known as region 1, which includes 2 other milk processing plants and 7 distribution stations. The processing plants process milk and other raw products for sale and distribution. The distribution stations contain, refrigeration facilities where processed milk is stored for subsequent distribution. 114 NLRB No. 155. H. P. HOOD & SONS, INC. 979 In the distribution of its products the Employer employs whole- sale and retail drivers. Wholesale drivers, who are salaried, deliver ,large quantities of the Employer's products to such places as stores, restaurants, and institutions. Retail drivers, who are paid on a base- pay-plus-commission basis, make their deliveries directly to con- sumers, primarily private homes, on a door-to-door basis. The whole- sale and retail drivers are considered a part of the Employer's milk division, which is an operating division, and which also includes pro- duction and maintenance employees at the Employer's processing plants.' A senior board of executives, composed of 21 individuals, is direct- ly responsible to the Employer's president. This board functions as a collective general manager. It meets weekly, reviews all the Em- ployer's operations, and acts on the recommendations of its individual members. It decides such matters as wage increases, personnel poli- cies, changes in employee benefits, and the hire of additional em- ployees. It also formulates the Employer's policies on such matters as purchasing, marketing, and sales operations. Region 1 has 5 rep- resentatives on the senior board of executives, 2 of whom are also con- cerned with operations of the Employer's south (Massachusetts-Rhode Island) region. The Employer maintains a central personnel department in its Charlestown office where it keeps detailed personnel records for all employees throughout its operations. All personnel changes, trans- fers, and disciplinary matters with respect to all branch personnel are reviewed in this office. The Employer's region 1, called the Boston region, encompasses greater Boston and its environs. It includes processing plants at Lynn and Bridgewater, Massachusetts, in addition to the processing plant at Charlestown. The distribution stations of region 1 are located at Dorchester, Forest Hills, Malden, Medford, Quincy, Salem, Natick, Norwood, and Watertown, Massachusetts. The Bridgewater plant, which is about 27 miles from the Charlestown plant, is the-location in region I that is most distant from the Charlestown plant. All the distribution stations are within an approximate 15-mile radius of the Charlestown plant. Wholesale and retail drivers' work out of each of the processing plants and distribution stations in region 1. There are approximately 260 wholesale drivers and helpers and 810 retail drivers in the region; of these 115 wholesale drivers and helpers and 136 retail drivers work out of the Charlestown plant. The wholesale drivers based at the Charlestown plant have the same duties and perform the same func- tions as wholesale drivers based at the other region 1 processing plants I The Employer has seven operating divisions khown as country, egg, ice cream, food products, engineering and vehicle, dairy products supply, and milk 387644-56=vol 114-63 980 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and distribution stations. Thus all wholesale drivers based in region 1 drive, for the most part, standard trucks, deliver similar products, work the same hours, wear a standard uniform, and follow the same delivery procedures and accounting methods for the products they deliver. All region 1 wholesale drivers presently receive identical wages and fringe benefits and, during the past 5 years, have received uniform wage increases. From 1952 to May 1955, the milk division of region 1 was organized into three separate departments, each under a different manager. One department, under a regional manager of milk plants, covered all pro- duction and maintenance employees at all the processing plants and distribution stations in the region, including employees engaged in interplant transportation, but excluding drivers engaged in retail and wholesale sales. The second, under a regional general sales manager, covered retail sales and drivers at Charlestown, and retail and whole- sale sales and drivers at the other plants and stations in the region. The third, under a Mr. Hallam, covered special wholesale sales for the entire company and wholesale sales and drivers at Charlestown. III May 1955, shortly after the Petitioner commenced its organizing drive, the Employer changed its administrative organization by transferring wholesale sales and drivers at Charlestown from Mr. Hallam to the department headed by the regional general sales manager. The various region 1 processing plants and distribution stations appear to be functionally interdependent and integrated. Thus as the areas covered by the several locations are contiguous to each other, drivers from two locations may service different customers separated only by a few blocks. The city of Cambridge is illustrative of this pattern. It is served by drivers from three different region 1 locations, including drivers from the Charlestown plant. Where growth of busi- ness demands, the Employer may open new region 1 distribution sta- tions. In such cases, existing delivery routes may be transferred to new stations without change in the manner of their operation or the status of the drivers who are thereby affected. Similarly, region 1 distribution stations may be abandoned, and the routes involved may be consolidated with routes operating from other route 1 locations. The record shows that a number of wholesale drivers have in the past been transferred from one region 1 location to another. During the last 3 years, 3 wholesale drivers were transferred to the Charles- town plant and 5 were transferred from the Charlestown plant to other region 1 locations. Of the present complement of 115 wholesale drivers at Charlestown, 14 were transferred there as the result of the permanent closing of other locations; and of the 145 wholesale drivers at region 1 locations other than Charlestown, 9 were transferred to their present locations as the result of such closings. In cases of emer- gency, the Employer also follows the practice of temporarily detailing drivers from one location to another within the region. H. P. HOOD & SONS, INC. 981 The Petitioner is the current bargaining representative of employees of 10 other milk producing companies operating in the Boston area. These companies sign separate but identical. contracts with the Peti- tioner, their current agreements being effective from October 1; 1952, until March 31, 1956. The operations of these companies are con- ducted in substantially the same manner as the Employer conducts its operations. Some of them operate processing plants and separate dis- tribution stations 2 In each instance the Petitioner's agreements with these companies are coextensive with the installations of the company concerned. The Petitioner's business agent testified that he surveyed the opera- tions at Charlestown with the intention of effecting the organization of the Employer's employees. Based primarily upon the fact that the Charlestown wholesale drivers were then separately supervised as indi- cated above, the instant petition was filed. The business agent testified further that if the Petitioner succeeds in its present efforts to become the bargaining representative of the Charlestown wholesale drivers, it will eventually seek to organize other employees at Charlestown and at the Employer's other locations in the Boston area , and will thus bring the Employer's employees into line with the pattern of organiza- tion affecting employees of milk producers in the Boston area. On the basis of the foregoing, we conclude that a unit confined to wholesale drivers at the Charlestown plant is inappropriate. It is clear that the Employer's distribution operations in its region 1 are integrated, and that the Charlestown wholesale drivers have the same interests and working conditions as those of the wholesale drivers at other region 1 locations. Moreover, a unit limited to employees at the Charlestown plant does not conform in scope to the pattern of bargain- ing for milk producers in the Boston area. The extent of the Peti- tioner's organization of the Charlestown employees may not be a deter- minative factor in determining the appropriate unit.' For these rea- sons, we shall dimiss the petition.' [The Board dismissed the petition.] MEMBER MURDOCK took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Order. 2 For example , Whiting Milk Company has branches in Quincy, Hyde Park , Dorchester, Marblehead , Watertown, Hyannis, and Onset, Massachusetts ; White Bros . Milk Co. has branch distribution stations in Needham and Duxbury , Massachusetts ; and United Farmers of New England , Inc., has branch distribution stations in Chelsea and Lynn, Massachusetts 8 See Sanitary Farms Dairies, Inc, 107 NLRB 955, Kress Dairy, Inc, 98 NLRB 369. 4 Beatrice Foods Co , 112 NLRB 459; Holsu,n Bakers, In,., 102 NLRB 1493; Blue Ribbon Creamery, 94 NLRB 201 ; The Borden Company, 89 NLRB 227. The Petitioner's showing of interest is inadequate with respect to any possible unit broader than the one petitioned for. Accordingly it is unnecessary for us to pass upon the validity of the Employer 's various unit contentions. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation