01994669
11-08-1999
Guy R. De La Houssaye, Appellant, v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.
Guy R. De La Houssaye v. Department of Veterans Affairs
01994669
November 8, 1999
Guy R. De La Houssaye, )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01994669
) Agency No. 99-1339
Togo D. West, Jr., )
Secretary, )
Department of Veterans Affairs, )
Agency. )
)
DECISION
The Commission finds that the agency's April 26, 1999 decision dismissing
a portion of appellant's complaint on the grounds of failure to state a
claim and because it states the same claim that is pending or has been
decided by the agency or Commission is not proper, in part, pursuant to
the provisions of EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. ��1614.107(a).
The record shows that appellant filed a formal complaint of discrimination
alleging that he had been discriminated against on the bases of race
(Black), color (black), national origin (Hispanic), and reprisal when: (1)
on August 14, 1997, he was harassed when the Injury Compensation Manager
did absolutely nothing with his paperwork in processing his OWCP claim;
(2) on September 6, 1998, he was informed by letter that his LWOP was
not to exceed September 6, 1998, and after that date he would have no
position in Engineering Service; and, (3) after September 30, 1998,
the responsible management official (RMO) had received many special
contribution awards with the blessings of the front office.
The agency issued a final decision accepting allegation (2) for
investigation. Allegation (1) was dismissed on the grounds that it
raised the same matter that had already been decided by the agency or
the Commission. The agency noted that appellant had raised this issue
on two different complaints, one of them "pending a hearing" before an
EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ). Allegation (3) was dismissed on the
grounds of failure to state a claim.
We find that the dismissal of allegation (1) was improper. The agency
held that the issue raised in allegation (1) had been previously raised by
appellant in two different complaints. The agency further found that the
issue was pending a hearing before an EEOC AJ. Nevertheless, the agency
has failed to provide evidence sufficient to enable us to determine that
said allegation was in fact previously raised by appellant and already
considered by the agency or the Commission. Absent such documentation
we are unable to affirm the agency's dismissal.
An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee or
applicant who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by
that agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or
disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �1614.103; �1614.106(a). The Commission
has held that while the regulations do not define the term "aggrieved
employee," the United States Supreme Court has interpreted it to mean
an employee who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term,
condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy.
Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (Apr. 21,
1994). "To state a claim under our regulations, an employee must allege
and show an injury in fact." Id. (citing Hackett v. McGuire Bros., 445
F.2d 447 (3d Cir. 1971)). "Specifically, an employee must allege and
show a `direct, personal deprivation at the hands of the employer,' that
is, a present and unresolved harm or loss affecting a term, condition
or privilege of his/her employment." Id. (citing Hammonds v. United
States Postal Serv., EEOC Request No. 05900863 (Oct. 31, 1990); Taylor
v. United States Postal Serv., EEOC Request No. 05900367 (June 2, 1990)).
In allegation (3) appellant claims that he was discriminated against
when the RMO received many special contribution awards. Appellant has
failed to show how the awards in question caused him to suffer a harm
to the terms, conditions or privileges of his employment (appellant's).
Accordingly, we find that appellant has failed to show that he was
aggrieved. Therefore, allegation (3) was properly dismissed on the
basis of failure to state a claim.
Accordingly, the dismissal of allegation (3) is AFFIRMED. The dismissal
of allegation (1) was not proper and is hereby REVERSED. Allegation (1)
is REMANDED for further processing in accordance with this decision and
applicable regulations.
ORDER (E1092)
The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded allegation in accordance
with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant
that it has received the remanded allegation within thirty (30) calendar
days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to
appellant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant
of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days
of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise
resolved prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision
without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty
(60) days of receipt of appellant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy
of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights
must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The
report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to
the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's
order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of
the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right
to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's
order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.
See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,
the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying
complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File
A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for
enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to
the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the
appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the
complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.
See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �l6l4.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0993)
This decision affirms the agency's final decision in part, but it also
requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a
portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action
in an appropriate United States District Court on both that portion of
your complaint which the Commission has affirmed AND that portion of the
complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative processing.
It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file
a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN
NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.
You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have
interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that
a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the
date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action
is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)
CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult
an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction
in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file
a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the
date you filed your complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the
Commission, until such time as the agency issues its final decision
on your complaint. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE
DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD
OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND
OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case
in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and
not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
11/08/1999
DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations