GRUBER et al.v.BIGG et al.Download PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesAug 9, 200008515696 (B.P.A.I. Aug. 9, 2000) Copy Citation The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 24 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ PATRICK R. GRUBER, JEFFREY J. KOLSTAD, ERICK S. HALL, ROBIN S. EICHEN CONN and CHRISTOPHER M. RYAN, Junior Party, (Patent 5,539,081), v. DONALD M. BIGG, RICHARD G. SINCLAIR, EDWARD S. LIPINSKY, JOHN H. LITCHFIELD and BILLY R. ALLEN, Senior Party (Application 08/515,696). _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,326 _______________ Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662 Upon consideration of the REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF ADVERSE JUDGMENT by Gruber (Paper 21), it is - 2 - ORDERED that junior party PATRICK R. GRUBER, JEFFREY J. KOLSTAD, ERICK S. HALL, ROBIN S. EICHEN CONN and CHRISTOPHER M. RYAN is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1 and 19 (corresponding to Count 1) of U.S. Patent 5,539,081, issued 23 July 1996, based on application 08/445,775, filed 22 May 1995. FURTHER ORDERED that nothing in this JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662 shall preclude the filing of a reissue application seeking to reissue a patent containing claims which are patentably distinct from claims 1 and 19. )))))))))))) @ )))))))))))) Upon consideration of the REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF ADVERSE JUDGMENT by Bigg (Paper 22), it is ORDERED that senior party DONALD M. BIGG, RICHARD G. SINCLAIR, EDWARD S. LIPINSKY, JOHN H. LITCHFIELD and BILLY R. ALLEN is not entitled to a patent containing claim 304 (corresponding to Count 1) of application 08/515,696, filed 16 August 1995. )))))))))))) @ )))))))))))) Receipt is acknowledged of the SUBMISSION UNDER 37 CFR 1.666 (Paper 23) to which is attached an ASSET SALE AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT filed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c). The ASSET SALE AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT shall be maintained separate from the interference file as requested. ______________________________ FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ______________________________) - 3 - JAMESON LEE ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ______________________________) RICHARD TORCZON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) - 4 - 104,326 cc (via First Class Mail): Attorney for Gruber (real party in interest Cargill, Incorporated): Douglas P. Mueller, Esq. Dennis R. Daley, Esq. MERCHANT & GOULD P.C. 3100 Norwest Center 90 South 7th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tel: 612-371-5237 (Mueller) Tel: 612-336-4689 (Daley) Fax: 612-332-9081 E-mail: dmueller@merchant-gould.com E-mail: ddaley@merchant-gould.com Attorney for Bigg (real party in interest Ecopol LLC): Craig C. Groseth, Esq. Michael L. Tompkins SHERIDAN ROSS P.C. 1560 Broadway Suite 1200 Denver, CO 80202-5141 Tel: 303-863-9700 Fax: 303-863-0223 E-mail: srlaw@sheridanross.com Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation