0120092887
11-09-2009
Greg L. Randel, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Greg L. Randel,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120092887
Agency No. 1G-754-0023-09
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the final
agency decision dated June 9, 2009, dismissing his formal complaint of
unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.
On April 23, 2009, complainant filed the instant formal complaint.
Therein, complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on
the basis of retaliation (unspecified) when:
on February 2, 2009, he applied for a 204b Supervisor position and was
denied the opportunity.
On June 9, 2009, the agency issued a final decision dismissing the
instant complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �
1614.107(a)(1). The agency found that complainant did state a valid
purview of discrimination. Specifically, the agency noted that in
the instant formal complaint, complainant cited retaliation as the
only basis of discrimination. The agency further stated that during
the investigation into the instant complaint, complainant was asked
to identify the prior EEO activity or protected activity that he had
engaged in that led to his claim of discrimination. The agency stated
that complainant was also asked if management officials cited in his
claim were aware and/or were involved in his prior protected activity
and how the prior protected activity factored in his allegation of being
denied an opportunity to become a 204b Supervisor. The agency stated
that to all of these questions, complainant responded "N/A."
The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in
relevant part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to
state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved
employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been
discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,
sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103,
.106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined
an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with
respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which
there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request
No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).
Upon review, we find that complainant failed to identify the prior
EEO activity or protected activity that he had engaged in that led to
his claim of retaliation. The record reveals that complainant did not
allege any basis for his claim in his formal complaint. Complainant does
not allege any basis on appeal within the purview of the regulations.
Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss the complaint for failure
to state a claim was proper and is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth
herein.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M1208)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the
policies, practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,
Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request
to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail
within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the
defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that
the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also
permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other
security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within
the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with
the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.
Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time
limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
November 9, 2009
_________________
Date
2
0120092887
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
3
0120092887
4
0120092887