Gloria A. Earl, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 16, 1999
01985245 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 16, 1999)

01985245

06-16-1999

Gloria A. Earl, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Gloria A. Earl v. United States Postal Service

01985245

June 16, 1999

Gloria A. Earl, )

Appellant, )

)

v. )

) Appeal No. 01985245

William J. Henderson, ) Agency No. 4-H-370-0099-98

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

______________________________)

DECISION

The appellant timely filed an appeal with this Commission from a final

agency decision (FAD), dated May 20, 1998, which the agency issued

pursuant to EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(b). The Commission

accepts the appellant's appeal in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960,

as amended.

According to the record, appellant initiated contact with the EEO office

on December 16, 1997. Appellant alleged that she was the victim of

unlawful employment discrimination on the bases of physical disability

(left wrist) and reprisal (prior EEO activity). Informal efforts to

resolve her concerns were unsuccessful.

On March 30, 1998 appellant filed a formal complaint alleging she

was discriminated against when the injury compensation office sent

a blank CA-2A form to OWCP causing appellant's claim to be denied.

On the complaint form, in the portion where complainant's are requested

to indicate the date on which the alleged incident of discrimination

occurred, appellant entered "6-9-97 processed by OWCP 9/25/97."

The agency dismissed appellant's complaint for failure to timely seek

EEO counseling. Specifically, the agency determined that appellant

first contacted the EEO office on December 16, 1997. The FAD concluded

appellant's contact was 190 days after the June 9, 1997 event date,

and therefore well beyond the forty-five (45) day time limitation.

On appeal, appellant argues that she was not aware of the event until

she received a copy of her medical records from OWCP in December 1997.

Therefore, she contends her December 16, 1997 EEO counselor contact was

timely.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of

discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment

Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the

matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel

action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.

The Commission has adopted a "reasonable suspicion" standard (as opposed

to a "supportive facts" standard) to determine when the forty-five (45)

day limitation period is triggered. See Ball v. USPS, EEOC Request

No. 05880247 (July 6, 1988). Thus, the time limitation is not triggered

until a complainant reasonably suspects discrimination, but before all

the facts that support a charge of discrimination have become apparent.

In the instant case, the agency determined that appellant alleged that

on June 9, 1997 the injury compensation office sent a blank CA-2A to

OWCP causing appellant's claim to be denied, and that her initial

EEO counselor contact on December 16, 1997 was therefore untimely.

The record contains three separate dates provided by the appellant as the

date that the alleged incident of discrimination occurred: in her formal

complaint, she stated June 9, 1997 and September 25, 1997; and on appeal

she states December 1997. As there is conflicting information in the

record regarding when the alleged incident in the complaint precisely

occurred and when appellant should have had a reasonable suspicion of

discrimination, we are unable to determine whether appellant's initial

EEO counselor contact was timely. Accordingly, the agency's decision

to dismiss appellant's complaint is VACATED. Appellant's complaint is

REMANDED to the agency for further processing in accordance with the

ORDER below.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to take the following action:

The agency shall contact appellant and conduct a supplemental

investigation to ascertain the exact date(s) that the matters addressed

in appellant's formal complaint purportedly occurred, as well as the

date appellant first reasonably suspected discrimination. Thereafter,

the agency shall issue a final decision or notify the appellant that

the agency is processing her complaint. The supplemental investigation

and issuance of the notice of processing or new final decision must

be completed within sixty (60) calendar days from the date that this

decision becomes final.

A copy of the new final agency decision or notice of processing must be

sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action.

The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

June 16, 1999

___________________________________

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations