01974452
01-20-1999
Gisele M. Bradley, Appellant, v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.
Gisele M. Bradley v. Department of the Navy
01974452
January 20, 1999
Gisele M. Bradley, )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01974452
) Agency No. 95-62306-010
Richard J. Danzig, )
Secretary, )
Department of the Navy, )
Agency. )
___________________________________)
DECISION
The Commission finds that the agency's decision dated April 7,
1997 dismissing appellant's complaint on the grounds that appellant
failed to timely contact an EEO Counselor is proper pursuant to 29
C.F.R. �1614.107(b). Appellant alleged in the complaint that appellant
was discriminated against when:
[T]he Secretaries Audit of October 1993 failed to identify a promotion
to a GS-06 for a position to which I was entitled to as a result of EEOC
. . . Appeal Number 01942590 of 21 April 1995.
Appellant initially contacted an EEO Counselor on July 7, 1995.
The Commission finds that appellant was informed of the results of
the Secretaries Audit by memorandum dated March 30, 1994. Therefore,
we find that appellant should have reasonably suspected discrimination
regarding position classifications when appellant knew of appellant's
and a coworker's position classification in 1994 (appellant's complaint
apparently concerns, at least in part, the classification of the
coworker's position). Appellant's contact of an EEO Counselor on July
7, 1995 was more than 45 days after appellant should have reasonably
suspected discrimination. The EEOC Appeal decision referenced by
appellant occurred after appellant should have reasonably suspected
discrimination. Because of our disposition we do not address the agency's
other reasons for dismissing the complaint.
The agency's decision dismissing the complaint is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �l6l4.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)
It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file
a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN
NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.
You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have
interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that
a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the
date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action
is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)
CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult
an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction
in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,
YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE
OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS
OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in
the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the
national organization, and not the local office, facility or department
in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a
civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative
processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
January 20, 1999
DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director
Office of Federal Operations