Gilt Edge Textile Mills, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Dec 24, 1943

54 N.L.R.B. 21 (N.L.R.B. 1943)

In the Matter of GILT EDGE TEXTILE MILLS, INC. and TExTILE WORKERS
UNION OF AMERICA (C. I. 0.)
_ Case No. 1-R-163/.Decided December 24, 1.943
Mr. Jacob Dimond, of New Bedford, Mass., for the Company.
Mr. Antonio England, of New Bedford, Mass., for the T. W. U. A.
Mr. Henry Wise, of Boston, Mass., for the Loom Fixers, Slasher
Tenders, and Knot Tiers.
Hr. William E. G. Batty, of New Bedford, Mass., for the U. T. W. A.
Mr. William C. Baisinger, Jr.,'of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon petition duly filed by Textile Workers Union of America,
(C. I. 0.), herein called the T. W. U. A., alleging that a question affect-
ing commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees
of Gilt Edge Textile Mills, Inc., New Bedford, Massachusetts, herein
called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided
for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Robert E. Greene,
Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at New Bedford, Massa-
chusetts, on November 9, 1943. The Company, the T. W. U. A., New
Bedford Loom Fixers Union, Local No. 2, A. F. of L., herein called the
Loom Fixers, New Bedford Slasher Tenders and Helpers Union, Local
No. 345, A. F. of L., herein called the Slasher Tenders, New Bedford
Knot Tiers and Helpers Union, Local No. 1649, A. F. of L., herein called
the Knot Tiers,l and United Textile Workers of America, A. F. of L.
herein called the U. T. W. A., appeared and participated. All parties
were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-
examine witnesses, to introduce evidence bearing upon the issues, and
to file briefs with the Board. The Trial Examiner's rulings made
at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following :
' We shall hereinafter sometimes refer to the Loom Fixers, the Slasher Tenders, and the
Knot Tiers collectively as the Locals
54 N. L. R. B., No. 4.
2]
22 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Gilt Edge Textile Mills, Inc., is a Massachusetts corporation en-
gaged at New Bedford, Massachusetts, in the business of weaving cloth
from rayon yarn on a commission basis. All of the raw yarn used
by the Company is owned by other companies who ship it to the Com-
pany's mill from points outside the State of Massachusetts. Approxi-
mately all of the finished products manufactured by the Company
are shipped to points outside the State of Massachusetts. The Com-
pany receives over $200,000 in commissions annually. The Com-
pany does not deny and we find, that it is engaged in commerce within
the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
Textile Workers Union of America is a labor organization affiliated
with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, admitting to member-
ship employees of the Company.
New Bedford Loom Fixers Union Local No. 2, is a labor organiza-
tion affiliated with the United Textile Workers of America and the
American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership employees
of the Company.
New Bedford Slasher Tenders and Helpers Union, Local No. 345,
is a labor organization affiliated with the United Textile Workers of
America and the American Federation of Labor, admitting to mem-
bership employees of the Company.
New Bedford Knot Tiers and Helpers Union, Local No. 1649, is a
labor organization affiliated with the United Textile Workers of
America and the American Federation of Labor, admitting to mem-
bership employees of the Company.
United Textile Workers of America is a labor organization affiliated
with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership
employees of the Company.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
By letter dated September 20, 1943, the T. W. U. A. notified the
Company that it had been selected as bargaining representative by
a majority of the employees within an alleged appropriate unit and
requested recognition as their exclusive bargaining representative.
The Company refuses to accord such recognition unless and until
the Board has made a determination with respect to the appropriate
unit and certified a labor organization as the exclusive bargaining
representative of such employees.
GILT EDGE TEXTILE MILLS,-INC. 23
A statement prepared by the Regional Director and introduced into
evidence at the hearing indicates that the T. W. U. A. and U. T. W. A.
each represents a substantial number of employees within the unit
hereinafter found to be appropriate.2
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The T. W. U. A. contends that a bargaining unit comprised of all
employees of the Company, excluding executives,' supervisory em-
ployees and clerical employees, is appropriate. The U. T. W. A. and
the Locals dispute the appropriateness of a plant-wide unit, contend-
ing that three separate craft units comprised of (1) slasher tenders
and helpers, (2) loom fixers, and (3) knot tiers and helpers employed
by the Company constitute the only appropriate bargaining units.
At the 'hearing, the parties agreed and we find that the facts perti-
nent to the issues involved in this proceeding are substantially the
same as appear in the record in the Ramsay hulls case.3 Accordingly,
for reasons stated in our decision in that case, we conclude that the
three separate units requested by the Locals are inappropriate for
the purposes of collective bargaining and find that the plant-wide unit
requested by the T. W. U. A. is appropriate for such purposes.
We find that all employees of the Company, excluding executives.
clerical 'employes, and all other employees with authority to hire,
promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the
status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute
a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within
the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act.
V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
We shall direct that the question concerning representation which
has arisen be resolved by means of an election by secret ballot among
the employees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the
pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of
Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in
the Direction.
2 The Regional Director reported that the T. W U. A. submitted 41 application-for-mem-
bership cards which bear the apparently genuine signatures of persons whose names appear
on the Company's pay roll of October 1, 1943, which contains the names of 79 persons
within the alleged appropriate unit . The Regional Director's report further states that
the U. T. W. A submitted the records of 16 persons who are dues paying members of the
Locals and whose names appear on the aforesaid pay roll.
3 Matter of Ramsay Hills , Inc., Case No . 1-R-1633, 54 N L. R. B. 31.
24 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
At the hearing the U. T. W. A. requested that it be permitted to
participate in the election in the event the Board denied the requests of
the Locals and found an industrial unit to be appropriate. The history
of organization indicates that the U. T. W. A. has an interest in the
proceeding by reason of the affiliation of the Locals. We shall there-
fore direct that its name be placed on the ballot in the election herein-
after directed.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations
Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Rela-
tions Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, it is hereby
DiREcTm that, as part of the investigation to ascertain represent-
atives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Gilt Edge Textile
Mills, Inc., New Bedford, Massachusetts, an election by secret ballot
shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30)
days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and super-
vision of the Regional Director for the First Region, acting in this
,matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject
to Article,III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations,
among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV,
above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately
preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not
work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation
or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of
the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but
excluding any who have since quit or been discharged for cause, and
have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election,
to determine whether they desire to be represented by Textile Workers
Union of America, (C. I. 0.), or by United Textile Workers of
America, A. F. of L., for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by
neither.
MR. GERARD D. REILLY took no part in the consideration of the above
Decision and Direction of Election.