Geoffrey Jones, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (New York Metro Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 10, 2001
01A14057 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 10, 2001)

01A14057

02-10-2001

Geoffrey Jones, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (New York Metro Area), Agency.


Geoffrey Jones v. United States Postal Service

01A14057

February 10, 2001

.

Geoffrey Jones,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(New York Metro Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A14057

Agency No. 1A072004999; 1A072003199; 1A072002698

Hearing No. 170-AO-8628X; 170-AO-8629X; 170-AO-8630X

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from an final

agency action dated May 24, 2001, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section

501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. In his complaint,

complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on the bases

of race (Black), religion (Jehovah's Witness), sex (male), national origin

(unspecified), age (DOB: 2/7/1958), disability (asthma), and reprisal

(prior EEO activity) when:

on March 18, 1998, following an arbitrator's award which restored him to

duty from a prior removal action, he was ordered to complete a fitness

for duty examination, conducted by a criminal psychiatrist;

on February 15, 1999, he was placed on Emergency Off; and

on March 12, 1999, he was issued a Notice of Removal, which became

effective on April 16, 1999.

The record indicates that after the agency accepted and investigated

the above-stated complaint,

complainant was provided a copy of the investigative report and requested

a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ). On March 12, 2001,

the AJ ordered complainant to submit to deposition within 20 days of

the date of the order. Complainant refused to submit to a deposition

during the 20 day period.

On May 17, 2001, the AJ dismissed the complaint, for failure to abide

by an Order of an Administrative Judge. Although the AJ did not cite

the regulation he was relying upon for dismissing the complaint, the

Commission finds that the AJ was most likely relying on 29 C.F.R. �

1614.109(f)(3) to sanction complainant. The agency's final action

implemented the AJ's decision.

Upon review of the record, we find that complainant's complaint was

improperly dismissed, and we reverse the agency's final action and remand

the complaint to the agency for a decision on the merits. An AJ has

the authority to sanction a party for failure without good cause shown

to fully comply with an Order. Here, complainant's failure to submit

to deposition and puzzling explanation for not doing so does not rise

to the level of contumacious conduct. Accordingly, we find that the AJ

abused his discretion in issuing so severe a sanction as dismissal when a

lesser sanction would have been appropriate. Specifically, we find that

the AJ should have considered complainant's conduct as constituting a

withdrawal of his request for a hearing and the AJ should have remanded

the complaint to the agency. See Reed v. United States Postal Serv.,

EEOC Appeal No. 01A05039 (Jan. 3, 2001). Thereafter, the appropriate

action for the agency to have taken should have been to issue a decision

on the merits of the complaint (without a hearing). Id.

Accordingly, the agency's final action is REVERSED and this complaint

is REMANDED to the agency for further processing in accordance with this

decision and the Order below.

ORDER

Within sixty (60) calendar days from the date this decision becomes

final, the agency shall take final action in accordance with 29 C.F.R. �

1614.110. A copy of the agency's final decision must be sent to the

Compliance Officer referenced herein.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 10, 2001

__________________

Date