General Motors Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsMar 22, 194876 N.L.R.B. 879 (N.L.R.B. 1948) Copy Citation In the Matter of GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE COR- PORATION, NEW DEPARTURE DIVISION, SANDUSKY, OHIO, PLANT, EM- PLOYER and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 496, A. F. OF L., PETITIONER In the Matter of GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE COR- PORATION, NEW DEPARTURE DIVISION, SANDUSKY, OHIO, PLANT, EM- PLOYER and INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, C. I. 0., PETITIONER In the Matter of GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE COR- PORATION, NEW DEPARTURE DIVISION, SANDUSKY, OHIO, PLANT, EM- PLOYER and LOCAL UNION No. 224 OF THE U. A. OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING AND PIPE FITTING INDUSTRY (A. F. L.), PETITIONER In the Matter of GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE COR- PORATION, NEW DEPARTURE DIVISION, SANDUSKY, OHIO, PLANT, Ei%I- PLOYER and INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS, PETITIONER Cases Nos. 8-R-2540, 8-R-9545, 8-R-2638, and 8-R-2672, respec- tively.-Decided March 22,1948 Henry M. Hogan, by Mr. William J. Oldani, of Detroit, Mich., for the Employer. Mr. Ben Sprau, of Sandusky, Ohio, for the Engineers. Lamb, Goerlich, and Mack, by Messrs. Lowell Goerlich and Howard Seren, of Toledo, Ohio, for the UAW-CIO. Mr. Leslie E. Dilg, of Washington, D. C., and Mr. Arthur C. Held, of Sandusky, Ohio, for the Pipe Fitters. Mr. Howard Tausch, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Mr. H. I. Smith, of Sandusky, Ohio, for the IAM. Mr. Earl S. Streeter, of Toledo, Ohio, for MESA. Mr. E. Wayne Patterson, of 'Cleveland, Ohio, for the Blacksmiths. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS Upon separate petitions duly filed, a consolidated hearing was held in these cases at Sandusky, Ohio, on August 6, 1947, before John A. 76 N. L R . B, No. 122. 879 880 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Hull, Jr., hearing officer. At the hearing, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, C. I. 0., herein called the UAW-CIO, moved (1) to dis- miss the petitions respectively filed by International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 496, A. F. of L., herein called the Engineers; by Local Union No. 224 of the U. A. of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry (A. F. L.), herein called the Pipe Fitters; and by International Association of Machinists, herein called the IAM, and (2) to deny the unit requested by an intervening union, International Brotherhood of Blacksmiths, Drop Forgers and Helpers, AFL, herein called the Blacksmiths, on the ground that the units sought by the four latter unions are inap- propriate for the purposes of collective bargaining. The Employer moved specifically to dismiss the petition filed by the Pipe Fitters on the ground that the sole classification named therein does not exist at the Employer's plant; and moved generally to dismiss all the pe- titions on the ground that none of the labor organizations herein had complied with the filing requirements of Sections 9 (f) and (h) of the Act, as amended. For the reasons set forth in Section IV, below, the motion made by the UAW-CIO is granted with respect to the claim made by the Blacksmiths, and the motion is denied with re- spect to the petitions filed by the Engineers, the Pipe Fitters, and the IAM. The Employer's motion to' dismiss the Pipe Fitters' petition is denied, as the difference between the terminology used in the petition and that used by the Employer is immaterial. The Employer's motion to dismiss the petitions generally is denied, because, aside from any question of the timeliness of such request, all petitioning parties herein are now in compliance with the filing requirements of the Act. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER General Motors Corporation, a Delaware corporation with principal offices in New York City and Detroit, Michigan, conducts business operations through several unincorporated divisions. One of such divisions is the New Departure Division, which operates manufac- turing plants throughout the United States. This proceeding is con- cerned only with the Employer's plant operated by the New Departure Division at Sandusky, Ohio, where the Employer manufactures and assembles ball bearings. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION 881 The Employer procures from ,sources located outside the State of Ohio more than 15 percent, in value, of the raw materials used in manufacturing processes at the Sandusky plant. The Employer ships to places outside the State of Ohio more than 50 percent, in value, of the products finished at the Sandusky plant. The Employer admits and we find that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. H. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricul- tural Implement Workers of America, herein called the UAW-CIO, is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Or- ganizations, claiming to represent employees of the Employer. International Association of Machinists, herein called the IAM, is an unaffiliated labor organization, claiming to represent employees of the Employer. Mechanics Educational Society of America, herein called MESA, is an unaffiliated labor organization, claiming to represent employees of the Employer. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 496, herein called the Engineers; Local Union No. 224, of the U. A. of Journey- men and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry, herein called the Pipe Fitters ; and International Brotherhood of Blacksmiths, Drop Forgers and Helpers, herein called the Black- smiths, are each labor organizations affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, claiming to represent employees of the Em- ployer. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Employer refuses to recognize either the Engineers , the UAW- CIO, the Pipe Fitters, or the IAM as the exclusive bargaining rep- resentative of employees of the Employer until certified by the Board in an appropriate unit or units. We find that a question affecting commerce exists concerning the representation of employees of the Employer, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT; THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES The Employer manufactures and assembles ball bearings at its San- dusky, Ohio, plant, which is involved herein. The plant, which was, recently constructed, commenced functioning toward the end of 1946. All production operations are conducted within a single U-shaped 882 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD building, and are the integrated type common to large industrial enter- prises. There are 11 departments in the plant, 1 of which takes care of plant engineering and maintenance, and 10 ' of which are devoted to production. The bearings which are manufactured in the various production departments consist of four component parts : inner and outer rings, balls, and separators. Each of the parts is processed separately from an initial raw material stage, through several fabri- cating operations, and ultimately to the assembly department where the parts are assembled to form the finished bearings. The UAW-CIO, MESA, the TAM, and the Employer urge a plant- wide unit of all production and maintenance employees as appropriate for bargaining purposes. The TAM, however, would exclude there- from employees in the stream generating plant.2 The positions of the three A. F. L. unions herein, which seek separate units, are indicated and discussed below. There are not now any contracts between the Employer and any of these unions at the Sandusky plant. In support of its position that a plant-wide unit is appropriate, the UAW-CIO elicited testimony regarding two plants of the Em- ployer, located at Meriden and Bristol, Connecticut, where the Em- ployer manufactures products similar to those manufactured at its Sandusky plant, and where comparable employee classifications are listed. Collective bargaining at both the Meriden and Bristol plants in the past has been on a plant-wide basis; and included within the respective units at those plants are employees in the categories which the three A. F. L. unions seek herein to establish in separate units. It was also stipulated by the Employer that the plant-wide bargaining units at the Meriden and Bristol plants have caused no difficulties, and Lave enhanced and facilitated, rather than hindered, the efficiency of collective bargaining. In view of the successful history of plant-wide bargaining at the Employer's similar plants at Meriden and Bristol, and the absence of any history of collective bargaining at the Sandusky plant, we believe that the establishment herein of a single unit of all production and maintenance employees would be appropriate, were it not for the unit claims, set forth below, made by the unions which seek to represent employees at the Sandusky plant in separate units. Steamy plant unit: The Engineers seek a separate unit of employees in the steam generating plant, including operating engineers. The 1 Forge shop, ball shop, receiving, annealing, machinery, heat-ti eat, grinding, mechanical, inspection, and assembly departments 2 The petition filed by the I AM in Case No 8-R-2(i72 requests a unit of all production and maintenance employees At the hearing, the IA\I indicated that it would exclude employees in the steam generating plant from the unit it was seeking In view of our treatment of the steam plant employee,, as set forth below, we shall not, as was requested by the UAW=CIO, dismiss the petition of the IAN[ GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION 883 steam generating plant is located in a building which is separate from the main plant building. The employees who work in the steam plant, and the installation serviced by them, form a part of the Employer's maintenance department. The complement of the steam generating plant consists of four operating engineers, four firemen, and two employees classified as "boiler house miscellaneous," who perform general laboring duties. These employees are under the over-all supervision of a general fore- man who also supervises pipe fitters and plumbers. The employees in the steam generating plant are not interchanged with other em- ployees in the Sandusky plant, although in an emergency, replace- ments from elsewhere in the plant might be brought in as temporary substitutes for the laborers. It appears that employees in the steam generating plant constitute a homogeneous group, with similar interests as to their employment, and that the Board has in the past established separate units for like groups of employees.3 It further appears, however, that each of the operating engineers is responsible for the operation of the steam gen- erating plant during his respective shift, and that each of them has the power to make effective recommendations with respect to the dis- ciplining, pay, and status of the firemen and the laborers. Accord- ingly, upon the entire record, we find that the operating engineers are supervisors as defined in Section 2 (11), and are not employees within the meaning of the Act 4 They may not, therefore, be included within the scope of a separate unit of employees in the steam generat- ing plant, or any unit which may be found appropriate for the San- dusky plant.' We find that employees in the steam generating plant, excluding the operating engineers, may, if they so desire, be bargained for separately. We shall, however, make no final unit determination with respect to these employees pending the results of the elections we shall order herein. Forge, annealing, and heat treatment unit: The Blacksmiths seek to include in a separate unit employees who work in the forge, anneal- ing, and heat-treat department, including employees who work in the a Matter of General Motors Corporation, Fisher Body-Tei nstedt Division, 74 N. L R. B. 18 See also Matter of E TV Bliss Company , Toledo Works, 76 N L R. B 475 , Matter of Nash Motors Parts Plant , 46 N L R . B. 1093, 1095 , Matter of General Motors Corpora- tion , 42 N L. R. B 224 , 226 , Matter of General Motors Corporation , 28 N L. R B . 793, 795. ' Supeivisors are specifically excluded from the definition of the term "employee" in the Act See Section 2 (3) Operating engmeeis ate excluded from the scope of the coverage of the existing plant- wide contracts for production and maintenance employees at the Employer's Bristol and Meriden plant; In a recent case involving the Employer's Columbus, Ohio, plant, shift engineers « eie found to be supervisors See Matter of General Motors Corporation , Fishe; Body-Ternstedt Division, 74 N. L R B 18. 781902-48-vol. 76-57 884 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD several heat treatment installations in the plant, and employees who operate header machines. The work and function of these employees are summarized as follows : The inner and outer rings which constitute two of the four com- ponent parts of assembled ball bearings are made in the Sandusky plant either by a basic forging operation or by a machining process. Those which are forged are initially made from bar steel in the forge shops by means of a number of gas-fired furnaces and upset forging machines. The forging of the rings is the sole function of the forge shop, which is supervised separately from other production depart- ments. The operators of the upset machines and furnaces are gen- erally employees who have had no previous forge experience at the time of their initial employment. After their hiring they are trained by the Employer, and within 4 to 6 months usually become reasonably proficient in their work. The upset forging machines are nonauto- matic, and their operation, in conjunction with the furnaces, involves the exercise of a certain degree of judgment. Helpers, performing laboring duties, aid the operators, and may be called to act as their replacements. After the rings are forged in the forge shop, they are taken to an adjacent department, the annealing department, where they are heat- softened to eliminate stresses and strains in preparation for a machin- ing operation. The furnaces in the annealing department are also used to soften wire coils used in the manufacture of the balls for the bearings. Operators tend and control the furnaces in the annealing department; other employees insert and withdraw the rings and wire coils from the fires. In the Employer's manufacturing process, metals are also treated by heat in order to harden them. Such hardening operation occurs in three different places in the plant : (1) in the heat-treat department, which is a separately supervised department, where the rings are heat treated after machining, preparatory to grinding; (2) in the ball shop, where the balls are similarly treated; and (3) in the mechanical department, where tools are heat treated. The two heat treatment installation in the ball shop and mechanical department are organized as respective parts of the ball and mechanical departments, and are not separately supervised. The header machines, the operators of which the Blacksmiths would include in their separate unit, are located in the ball shop. These machines shear off a slug from a wire coil and force it between two dies to form a rough ball. The header machines work automatically, the function of the operator being that of a "feeder." No heat is used in this process. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION 885 There is no policy of interchange among employees in the several operations and departments sought by the Blacksmiths. The Black- smiths, however, in support of their position call to our attention the fact that all the employees they are seeking are concerned with some aspect of the traditional calling of the blacksmith, namely, the shaping and changing of the content of metal .6 We are nevertheless not per- suaded that the unit sought by the Blacksmiths is appropriate herein. None of the employees within the contemplated unit perform all of the functions generally attributable to the Blacksmiths' craft; at the most, certain of such employees, perform several of such functions.? The record, moreover, does not indicate that the community of inter- est which these employees have 'v 'ith other production workers, arising out of similar hours and tenure of employment, is destroyed by dif- ferences in the machines they of erate. All such workers form an es- sential part in the highly integr l.ted, straight-line type of production in the Employer's plant, and we do not believe that the identity of the interests of production employ ses arising out of iuch organization should be upset by the establish nent in a separate unit of employees with some quasi-craft skills. A ccordingly, we shalt include the em- ployees sought by the Blacksmiths in the unit of other production employees." Pipe fitter and plumber unit: The Pipe Fitters seck a separate unit of approximately four or five employees classified by the Employer as pipe fitters and plumbers, including two other employees who act as their helpers. All these employees are grouped within the plant's maintenance department, which includes employees in the various construction and maintenance trades. They are under the supervision of a foreman, who also, as indicated above, supervises the employees in the steam generating plant. The pipe fitters and plumbers work on sanitary installations, and perform maintenance and construction work on steam and process piping. They are skilled tradesmen with at least 2 years' experience. We are of the opinion that the pipe fitters and plumbers are a well- defined homogeneous group of craftsmen, and may, together with their helpers, constitute a separate unit. However, as indicated above, the inclusion of these employees with other maintenance employees in an , The Blacksmiths assert jurisdiction over all work pertaining to the blacksmith 's work, including forging , welding, and tempering operations . Constitution and By-Laws of the International Brotherhood of Blacksmiths , Drop Forgers and Helpers. 4 See Drew , Blacksmithing, Webb Publishing Company , 1935 ; Selvidge and Allton , Black- smsthing, The Manual Arts Press, 1925 ; Lillieo, Blacksmith's Manual Illustrated, Crosby Lockwood & Son, 1930 ; Friese, Farm Blacks uuti ing, The Manual Arts Press , 1921 , Diction- ary of Occupational Titles, Part I, Department of Labor, 1939. 8 Insofai as the decision in Matter of Dodge Chicago Plant, 55 N L . A. B 634, 646, decided in 1945, is inconsistent with the decision and results reached in this case as pertains to the unit sought by the Blacksmiths herein, the earlier case is hereby expressly overruled. 886 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD over-all unit of production and maintenance workers seems to us to be equally persuasive . Accordingly, in accordance with Board policy, we shall defer our decision regarding the unit placement of these employees pending the ascertainment of their desires as indicated by the results of the elections we shall hereinafter direct.9 The Time of the Elections At the hearing held in August 1947 , it was contended by the Em- ployer that an election should not be ordered in this proceeding at that time, because a representative group was not then employed at the Sandusky plant as the Employer was in the process of increasing the number of its employees . There were approximately 650 employees working in the plant at the time of the hearing, and the Employer then estimated that its complement would ultimately include approximately 2,800 to 3,000 employees . Since the close of the hearing, we have been administratively advised that, according to figures furnished by the Employer , there were approximately 1,100 production and mainte- nance employees in the plant in November 1947. We are further advised that the Employer anticipated that its complement would be increased to approximately 1,335 employees by March 1948 , and that a complement of approximately 1,600 employees was planned for June 1948. No increases were foreseen by the Employer in the number of pipe fitters and plumbers and their helpers, and the number of steam plant employees employed at the plant in November 1947. Under these circumstances , since approximately 80 percent of the Employer's estimated complement of production and maintenance employees for June 1948 is presently employed, and since no increases in the number of employees within the voting groups of steam plant employees and pipe fitters and plumbers are expected , we are of the opinion that the present employees are a representative group and that the holding of the elections is now feasible. Conclusions We shall make no final unit determination at the present time, but shall direct that separate elections by secret ballot be held among em- ployees at the Employer 's plant within each of the three following vot- ing groups, excluding all guards, professional employees , superintend- ents, foremen , assistant foremen, and other supervisors as defined in the Act : U Matter of Hayden Chemical Corporation , 72 N. L. R. B . 1240 ; Matter of Kaiser Indus- tries, 61 N L R. B . 682, Matter of Anniston Warehouse Corporation , 60 N L R. B 857 Matter of Dodge Chicago Plant , 55 N. L. R B 634 , 652 ; Mattel of Remington Arms Com- pany, Inc., 54 N. L R. B 338. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION 887 1. All production and maintenance employees, including employees in the forge shop and annealing department, employees in the heat- treat department and in the several heat treatment installations in the plant, and employees who operate header machines, but excluding employees in the steam generating plant, pipe fitters and plumbers, the helpers of pipe fitters and plumbers, clerical employees, and employees in the sales, accounting, personnel, and industrial relations departments. 2. All employees in the steam generating plant, excluding the operating engineers. 3. All pipe fitters and plumbers, and their helpers. We shall not place MESA, an Intervenor herein, on the ballots, because it has failed to comply with the filing requirements of the Act.io We shall place the UAW-CIO and the IAM on the ballots for em- ployees in all three voting groups, and shall place the Engineers and the Pipe Fitters on the ballots for employees in the second and third voting groups, respectively. Neither the Engineers nor the Pipe Fit- ters have indicated a desire to participate in an election involving a unit different from the units respectively sought by them, and we shall limit their participation accordingly. Similarly, and for the same reason, we shall not place the Blacksmiths on any of the ballots. DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS:". As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, New Departure Division, Sandusky, Ohio, separate elections by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (80) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Di- rector for the Eighth Region, and subject to Sections 203.61 and 203.62 of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 5, among the employees in the voting groups described in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or rein- stated prior to the date of the elections, and also excluding employees on strike who are not entitled to reinstatement, to determine whether 10 Matter of Sxgmnnd Cohn Mfg. Co , Inc., 75 N. L R B 177 ; Matter of Wilson Transit Company, 75 N L. It B. 181. 11 Any participant in the elections directed herein may , upon its prompt request to and approval thereof by the Regional Director , have its name removed from the ballots. 888 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (1) The employees in Group 1 desire to be represented by Interna- tional Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Imple- ment Workers of America, C. I. 0., or by International Association of Machinists, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. (2) The employees in Group 2 desire to be represented by Interna- tional Union of Operating Engineers, Local 496, A. F. of L., or by International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, C. I. 0., or by International Asso- ciation of Machinists, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by none. (3) The employees in Group 3 desire to be represented by Local Union No. 224 of the U. A. of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry (A. F. L.), or by International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, C. I. 0., or by International Association of Ma- chinists, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by none. MEMBER REYNOLDS, dissenting in part : I dissent from that portion of the Board's decision which holds that the operating engineers are supervisors. In my opinion, the record fails to establish their supervisory status, and I would, therefore, include them in the voting group comprised of the remaining em- ployees in the steam generating plant. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation